The Journal of Information Systems (한국정보시스템학회지:정보시스템연구)

Korea Association of Information Systems (한국정보시스템학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effects of Task Interdependence and Emotional Commitment on Employees' Two-way Communication and Their Knowledge Sharing

과업 상호의존성과 정서적 조직몰입이 구성원의 양방향 커뮤니케이션과 지식공유에 미치는 영향

  • 이승림 (방위사업청, 국방기술보호국) ;
  • 백승령 (국방대학교, 국방관리대학원 국방관리학과)
  • Received : 2020.10.28
  • Accepted : 2020.12.06
  • Published : 2020.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of two-way communication and knowledge sharing on the task performance of employees in the interdependent task structure in organizations. Based on the theories of social interdependence and organizational commitment, this study hypothesized the effects of task interdependency and emotional commitment on two-way communication and knowledge sharing, followed by the effects of these variables on the task performance of employees. Design/methodology/approach Survey results show that task interdependence and emotional commitment have positive effects on the degree of two-way communication and knowledge sharing. Two-way communication also has a positive impact on knowledge sharing, and knowledge sharing also improved the task performance of members. However, the relationship between two-way communication and task performance shows no significant impact. Findings Theoretically, this study is meaningful in that the process of task interdependence in relation to emotional commitment leading to task performance is theorized. In practice, this research suggests it is important to improve employees' two-way communication and knowledge sharing in order to lead to increase task performance in the interdependent task environment.

Keywords

References

  1. 강여진, "지식공유 영향요인이 업무성과에 미치는 영향," 한국행정논집, 제17권 제2호, 2005, pp. 431-460.
  2. 고영만, 권용혁, "지식기반사회의 인문사회과학 분야 지식 유형에 관한 담론," 한국문헌정보학회지, 제36권 제3호, 2002, pp. 115-132. https://doi.org/10.4275/KSLIS.2002.36.3.115
  3. 공재형, 성행남, "해외직구 소셜미디어 채널에서 웹메이븐의 지식공유 동기와 정보확산에 관한 연구," 인터넷전자상거래연구, 제14권 제6호, 2014, pp. 257-274.
  4. 권석균, 이을터, "지식경영 조직 인사관리 이슈에 관한 소고," 경제논총, 제18권 제1호, 1999, pp. 505-525.
  5. 김미숙, 홍관수, "조직공정성이 사회적 자본과 지식공유에 미치는 영향," 대한경영학회지, 제26권 제5호, 2013, pp. 1123-1148.
  6. 김현경, 장수돌, "커뮤니케이션 풍토가 지식공유 의도에 미치는 영향," 한국경영교육학회, 제30권 제4호, 2015, pp. 405-433.
  7. 박문수, 문형구, "지식공유의 영향요인: 연구동향과 과제," 지식경영연구, 제2권 제1호, 2001, pp. 1-23.
  8. 박문수, 문형구, "집단간 지식공유의 영향요인에 관한 연구," 지식경영연구, 제5권 제2호, 2004, pp. 1-23.
  9. 박희서, 임병춘, "지방공무원들의 효율적 지식 관리를 위한 인과모형 검증," 한국정책학회지, 제10권 제2호, 2001, pp. 111-134.
  10. 배종태, 전갑린, "공동연구 프로젝트에서의 참여기관 간 의사소통의 영향요인 및 성과에 관한 연구," 한국과학기술원 석사학위 논문, 1998.
  11. 사재명, "지방공무원의 지식관리에 관한 인식 분석," 한국지역정보화학회지, 제5권 제2호, 2002, pp. 81-106.
  12. 소택화, 고준, "모바일 폐쇄형 SNS 의 지속적 이용의도에 영향을 미치는 요인: 심층 인터뷰와 실증분석." 정보시스템연구, 제24권 제3호, 2015, pp. 21-46.
  13. 송상엽, 신호철, "건설프로젝트에서 커뮤니케이션 행위가 프로젝트 성과에 미치는 순차적 영향," 경영사학, 제25권 제1호, 2010, pp. 119-146.
  14. 오성호, 김보영, "연구개발 직군의 실행공동체 동기요인과 지원요인이 지식공유와 만족도 및 학습전이에 미치는 영향," 대한경영학회지, 제29권 제10호, 2016, pp. 1431-1457.
  15. 윤창근, 최정인, 정세희, "지식공유와 성과간의 인과구조: 구조방정식을 활용한 지식공유의 결정모형과 성과에 대한 영향분석," 지방정부연구, 제21권 제2호, 2017, pp. 231-259.
  16. 허명숙, 천면중, "플로우 (Flow) 의 구성요인, 조직몰입, 지식공유와 직무만족과의 관계에 대한 실증연구,"정보시스템연구, 제16권 제4호, 2007, pp. 1-31.
  17. 허명숙, 천면중, "조직구성원의 개인특성 및 과업특성과 직무만족과의 관계: 이타성과 지식공유의 매개적 역할," 대한경영학회지, 제21권 제6호, 2008, pp. 2711-2749.
  18. Anderson, J. C., and Narus, J. A., "A model of distributor firm and manufacturer firm working partnerships," Journal of Marketing, Vol. 54, No. 1, 1990, pp. 42-58. https://doi.org/10.2307/1252172
  19. Anderson, E., and Weitz, B., "Determinants of countinuity in conventional industrial channel dyads," Marketing Science, Vol. 8, No. 4, 1989, pp. 310-323. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.8.4.310
  20. Barclay, D., Higgins, C., and Thomson, R., "The partial Least Squares(PLS) approach to casual modeling: Personal computer adoption and use as an illustration," Technology Studies, Vol.2, No. 2, 1995, pp. 285-309.
  21. Chin, W. W., "Issue and opinion on structural equation modeling,". MIS Quarterly, Vol. 22, No. 1, 1998, pp. 7-16.
  22. Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., and Newsted, P. R., "A Partial Least Squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simmulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study," Information System Research, Vol. 14, No. 2, 2003, pp.9-21.
  23. Choi, S. Y., Lee, H., and Yoo, Y., "The impact of information technology and transactive memory systems on knowledge sharing, application, and team performance: A field study," MIS Quarterly, 2010, pp. 855-870. https://doi.org/10.2307/25750708
  24. DeSanctis, G., and Gallupe, R. B., "A foundation for the Study of group decision support systems," Management Science, Vol. 33, No. 5, 1987, pp. 589-609. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.33.5.589
  25. Daft, R. L., and Huber, G. P., "How organizations learn: A communication framework," Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 5, No. 7, 1987, pp. 1-36.
  26. Daft, R. L., and Lengel, R. H., "Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design," Management Science, Vol. 32, No. 5, 1986, pp. 554-571. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.554
  27. Deutsch, M., "A theory of cooperation and competition," Human Relations, Vol. 2, 1949, pp. 199-231. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872674900200301
  28. Elenkov. D. S., "Effects of leadership on organizational performance in Russian companies," Journal of Business Research, Vol. 55, No. 6, 2002, pp. 467-480. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(00)00174-0
  29. Faraj, S., and Sproull, L., "Coordinating expertise in software development teams," Management Science, Vol. 46, No. 12, 2001, pp. 1554-1568. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.12.1554.12072
  30. Fornell, C., and Larcker, D. F., "Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error," Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18, No. 1, 1981, pp. 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  31. Goldsmith, S., and Eggers, W. D., Governing by networks: The new shape of the public sector, Washingto, D. C.: Brookings Institution Press, 2004.
  32. Gupta, A. K., and Govindarajan, V., "Knowledge flows within multinational corporations," Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, No. 4, 2000, pp. 473-496. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200004)21:4<473::AID-SMJ84>3.0.CO;2-I
  33. Hanssen, M. T., Collaboration: How leaders Avoid the traps, build common ground and reap big results, Havard Business Review Press, 2009.
  34. Henderson, R. M., and Clark, K. B., "Architectural innovation: The reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 35, 1990, pp. 9-30. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393549
  35. Henderson, J. C., and Lee, S., "Managing IS design teams: A control theories perspective," Management Science, Vol. 38, No. 6, 1992, pp. 757-777. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.38.6.757
  36. Hendriks, P., "Why share knowledge? The influence of ICT on the motivation for knowledge sharing," Knowledge and Process Management, Vol. 6, No. 2, 1999, pp. 91-100. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1441(199906)6:2<91::AID-KPM54>3.0.CO;2-M
  37. Hsu, J. S. C., Shih, S. P., Chiang, J. C., and Liu, J. Y. C., "The impact of transactive memory systems on IS development teams' coordination, communication, and performance," International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 30, No. 3, 2012, pp. 329-340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.08.003
  38. Jason, D. S., and Michelle, K. D., "Interdependence and preference for group work: Main and congruence effects on the satisfaction and performance of group members," Journal of Management, Vol. 26, No. 2, 2000, pp. 259-279. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600205
  39. Jewels, T., and Ford, M., "Factors influencing knowledge sharing in information technology projects," e-Service Journal, Vol. 5, No. 1, 2006, pp. 99-117. https://doi.org/10.2979/ESJ.2006.5.1.99
  40. Johnson, D. W., "Social interdependece: Interrelationships among theory, research and practice," American Psychologist, Vol. 58, No. 11, 2003, pp. 934-945. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.58.11.934
  41. Kumar, K., van Fenema, P. C., and von Glinow, M. A., "Offshoring and the global distribution of work: Implications for task interdependence theory and practice," Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 40, No. 4, 2009, pp. 642-667. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2008.77
  42. Lewin, K., "Field theory of learning: In the psychology of learning," Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Vol. 41, 1942. pp. 215-242.
  43. Lishman, J., "Social work interviews: how effective are they? Research," Policy and Planning, Vol. 5, 1988. pp. 1-5.
  44. Massey, G. R., and Kyriazis, E., "Interpersonal trust between marketing and R&D during new product development projects," European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 41, No. 9,10, 2007, pp. 1146-1172. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560710773381
  45. McGuire, M., "Collaborative public management: Assessing what we know and how we know it," Public Administration Review, Vol. 66, 2006, pp. 33-43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00664.x
  46. Nelson, K. M., and Cooprider, J. G., "The contribution of shared knowledge to IS group performance," MIS Quarterly, 1996, pp. 409-432. https://doi.org/10.2307/249562
  47. O'Dell, C., and Grayson J. C., If only we knew what we know now: the transfer of internal knowledge and best practice, New York, 1998.
  48. Parolia, N., Jiang, J. J., Klein, G., and Sheu, T. S., "The contribution of resource interdependence to IT program performance: A social interdependence perspective," Information Systems Review, Vol. 16, No. 3, 2011, pp. 313-324.
  49. Pee, L. G., Kankanhail, A., and Kim. H. W., "Knowledge Sharing in information systems development: A social interdependence perspective," Journal of the Association for Information Systems, Vol. 11, No. 10, 2010, pp. 550-575. https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00238
  50. Pinto, M. B., and Pinto, J. K., "Project team communication and cross functional cooperation in new program development," Journal of Product Innovation Management: an international publication of the product development & management association, Vol. 7, No. 3, 1990, pp. 200-212. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.730200
  51. Rogers, E. M., and Kincaid, D. L., Communication networks: Towards a new paradigm., New York: Free press, 1981.
  52. Salaway, G., "An organizational learning approach to information systems development," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 11, No. 2, 1987, pp. 244-264. https://doi.org/10.2307/249370
  53. Sarker, S., Nicholson, D. B., and Joshi, K. D., "Knowledge transfer in virtual systems development teams: An exploratory study of four key enablers," Professional Communication, Vol. 48, No. 2, 2005, pp. 201-218. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPC.2005.849650
  54. Sawhney. M., and Prandelli. E., "Communities of creation: Managing distributed innovation in turbulent markets," California Management Review, Vol. 4, 2000, pp. 24-54. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166052
  55. Simonin, B. L., "The importance of collaborative Know-How: An empirical test of the learning organization," Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 40, No. 5, 1997, pp. 1150-1174. https://doi.org/10.2307/256930
  56. Staples, D. S., and Webster, J., "Exploring the effects of trust, task interdependence and virtualness on knowledge sharing in teams," Information Systems Journal, Vol. 18, pp. 2008, 617-640. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2575.2007.00244.x
  57. Szulanski, G., "Exploring international stickiness: Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm," Strategic Managemnet Journal, Vol. 17, 1996, pp. 27-43. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250171105
  58. Taggar, S., and Haines, V. Y., "I need you, you need me: A model of initiated task interdependence," Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 21, No. 3, 2006, pp. 211-230. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940610659560
  59. Temme, D., Kreis, H., and Hildebrandt., PLS path modeling-A Software Review. SFB 649 Discussion Papers, Humboldt University, Berlin, 2006.
  60. van de Ven., A. and Ferry, D., Measuring and assessing organizations, Wiley, New York, 1980.
  61. van der Vegt., G. S. and van de Vliert, E., "Effects of perceived skill dissimilarity and task interdependence on helping in work teams," Journal of Management, Vol. 31, No. 1, 2005, pp. 73-89. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206304271382
  62. Wageman, R., "Interdependence and group effectiveness," Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 40, No. 1, 1995, pp. 145-180. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393703
  63. Wasko, M. M., and Faraj, S., "Why should I share? Examining social capital and knowledge contribution in electronic networks of practice," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 29, No. 1, 2005, pp. 35-58. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148667
  64. Yousef, D. A., "Organizational commitment: a mediator of the relationships of leadership behavior with job satisfaction and performance in a non western country," Journal of Managerial Psychology, Vol. 15, No. 1, 2000, pp. 6-24. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940010305270
  65. Yuan, M., Zhang, X., Chen, Z., Vogel, D. R., and Chu, X., "Antecedents of coordination effectiveness of software developer dyads from interacting teams: An empirical investigation," Engineering Management, Vol. 56, No. 3, 2010, pp. 494-507.