대한후두음성언어의학회지 (Journal of the Korean Society of Laryngology, Phoniatrics and Logopedics)

  • 제31권2호
  • /
  • Pages.71-77
  • /
  • 2020
  • /
  • 2508-268X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2508-5603(eISSN)
대한후두음성언어의학회 (The Korean Society of Laryngology, Phoniatrics and Logopedics. )
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

성대 용종 환자의 후두미세수술 전후 음성 평가에서 OperaVOXTM와 Multi-Dimensional Voice Program 간의 신뢰도 연구

Reliability of OperaVOXTM against Multi-Dimensional Voice Program to Assess Voice Quality before and after Laryngeal Microsurgery in Patient with Vocal Polyp

  • 김선우 (성균관대학교 의과대학 강북삼성병원 이비인후과학교실) ;
  • 김소연 (성균관대학교 의과대학 강북삼성병원 이비인후과학교실) ;
  • 조재경 (성균관대학교 의과대학 강북삼성병원 이비인후과학교실) ;
  • 진성민 (성균관대학교 의과대학 강북삼성병원 이비인후과학교실) ;
  • 이상혁 (성균관대학교 의과대학 강북삼성병원 이비인후과학교실)
  • Kim, Sun Woo (Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Kim, So Yean (Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Cho, Jae Kyung (Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Jin, Sung Min (Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine) ;
  • Lee, Sang Hyuk (Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine)
  • 투고 : 2020.11.18
  • 심사 : 2020.12.07
  • 발행 : 2020.12.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

Background and Objectives OperaVOXTM (Oxford Wave Research Ltd.) is a portable voice analysis software package designed for use with iOS devices. As a relatively cheap, portable and easily accessible form of acoustic analysis, OperaVOXTM may be more clinically useful than laboratory-based software in many situations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the agreement between OperaVOXTM and Multi-Dimensional Voice Program (MDVP; Computerized Speech Lab) to assess voice quality before and after laryngeal microsurgery in patient with vocal polyp. Materials and Method Twenty patients who had undergone laryngeal microsurgery for vocal polyp were enrolled in this study. Preoperative and postoperative voices were assessed by acoustic analysis using MDVP and OperaVOXTM. A five-seconds recording of vowel /a/ was used to measure fundamental frequency (F0), jitter, shimmer and noise-to-harmonic ratio (NHR). Results Several acoustic parameters of MDVP and OperaVOXTM related to short-term variability showed significant improvement. While pre-operative value of F0, jitter, shimmer, NHR was 155.75 Hz (male: 125.37 Hz, female: 183.37 Hz), 2.20%, 6.28%, 0.16, post-operative values of these parameter was 164.34 Hz (male: 129.42 Hz, female: 199.26 Hz), 2.15%, 5.18%, 0.14 Hz in MDVP. While pre-operative value of F0, jitter, shimmer, NHR was 168.26 Hz (male: 135.16 Hz, female: 201.37 Hz), 2.27%, 6.95%, 0.26, post-operative values of these parameters was 162.72 Hz (male: 128.267 Hz, female: 197.18 Hz), 1.71%, 5.36%, 0.20 in OperaVOXTM. There was high intersoftware agreement for F0, jitter, shimmer with intraclass correlation coefficient. Conclusion Our results showed that the short-term variability of acoustic parameters in both MDVP and OperaVOXTM were useful for the objective assessment of voice quality in patients who received laryngeal microsurgery. OperaVOXTM is comparable to MDVP and has high intersoftware reliability with MDVP in measuring the F0, jitter, and shimmer

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kim J, Choi HS. Comparison of clinicians' perceptual evaluations and patients' subjective evaluations of voice disorders. Commun Sci Disord 2009;14(2):223-35.
  2. Rubin AD, Praneetvatakul V, Gherson S, Moyer CA, Sataloff RT. Laryngeal hyperfunction during whispering: reality or myth? J Voice 2006;20(1):121-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvoice.2004.10.007
  3. Yu P, Ouaknine M, Revis J, Giovanni A. Objective voice analysis for dysphonic patients: a multiparametric protocol including acoustic and aerodynamic measurements. J Voice 2001;15(4):529-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0892-1997(01)00053-4
  4. Jin SM. Introduction of acoustic analysis of voice. Korean J Otolaryngol 2004;47(10):943-9.
  5. Maryn Y, Roy N, De Bodt M, Van Cauwenberge P, Corthals P. Acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: a meta-analysis. J Acoust Soc Am 2009;126(5):2619-34. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.3224706
  6. Siau RTK, Goswamy J, Jones S, Khwaja S. Is OperaVOX a clinically useful tool for the assessment of voice in a general ENT clinic? BMC Ear Nose Throat Disord 2017;17:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12901-017-0037-9
  7. Hah JH, Sim S, An SY, Sung MW, Choi HG. Evaluation of the prevalence of and factors associated with laryngeal diseases among the general population. Laryngoscope 2015;125(11):2536-42. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.25424
  8. Byeon HK, Han JH, Choi BI, Hwang HJ, Kim JH, Choi HS. Treatment of hemorrhagic vocal polyps by pulsed dye laser-assisted laryngomicrosurgery. Biomed Res Int 2015;2015:820654.
  9. Oguz H, Kilic MA, SAFAK MA. Comparison of results in two acoustic analysis programs: Praat and MDVP. Turk J Med Sci 2011;41(5):835-41.
  10. Shim S, Kim H, Kim J, Shin J. Difference in voice parameters of MDVP and Praat programs according to severity of voice disorders in vocal nodule. Phonetics and Speech Sciences 2014;6(2):107-14. https://doi.org/10.13064/KSSS.2014.6.2.107
  11. Yoo JY, Jeong OR, Jang TY, Ko DH. A correlation study among acoustic parameters of MDVP, Praat, and Dr. Speech. Speech Sciences 2003;10(3):29-36.
  12. Vogel AP, Rosen KM, Morgan AT, Reilly S. Comparability of modern recording devices for speech analysis: smartphone, landline, laptop, and hard disc recorder. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2014;66(6):244-50. https://doi.org/10.1159/000368227
  13. Carding PN, Wilson JA, MacKenzie K, Deary IJ. Measuring voice outcomes: state of the science review. J Laryngol Otol 2009;123(8):823-9. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215109005398
  14. Brockmann-Bauser M, Drinnan MJ. Routine acoustic voice analysis: time to think again? Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2011;19(3):165-70. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOO.0b013e32834575fe
  15. Wang JH, Park SK, Lee SK, Choi SH, Kim SY, Nam SY. Comparison of the results of voice handicap index and computer-assisted voice analysis in patients with benign vocal cord lesions before and after microlaryngeal surgery. Korean J Otolaryngol 2005;48(3):380-6.