DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Effect of Milk Protein on the Biological and Rheological Properties of Probiotic Capsules

  • Kil, Bum Ju (Biomodulation major and Center for Food and Bioconvergence, Seoul National University) ;
  • Yoon, Sung Jin (Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, Dongguk University-Seoul) ;
  • Yun, Cheol-Heui (Biomodulation major and Center for Food and Bioconvergence, Seoul National University) ;
  • Huh, Chul-Sung (Institute of Green-Bio Science and Technology, Seoul National University)
  • Received : 2020.08.04
  • Accepted : 2020.10.06
  • Published : 2020.12.28

Abstract

Probiotics are often infused into functional foods or encapsulated in a supplement form to maintain a healthy balance between the gut microbiota and their host. Because there are milk-based functional foods such as yogurt and cheese on the market, it has been suggested that milk-based probiotics could be incorporated into skim milk proteins in a liquid capsule. Skim milk is mainly composed of casein and whey protein, which create a strong natural barrier and can be used to encapsulate probiotics. In this study, we compared the encapsulated probiotics prepared with milk-based concentrated cell mixtures using commercial probiotics. Probiotic capsules were emulsified with skim milk proteins using vegetable oil to form a double coating layer. The product was heat-stable when tested using a rheometer. The survival rate of the milk-based probiotic cells in the lower gastric environment with bile was significantly higher than commercial probiotics. Thus, milk-encapsulated probiotics exhibited greater efficacy in the host than other types of probiotics, suggesting that the former could be more viable with a longer shelf life under harsh conditions than other form of probiotics. Our findings suggested that, compared with other types of probiotics, milk-based probiotics may be a better choice for producers and consumers.

Keywords

References

  1. Sekhon BS. 2010. Food nanotechnology e an overview. Nanotechnol. Sci. Appl. 3: 1-15.
  2. Butel MJ. 2014. Probiotics, gut microbiota and health. Med. Mal. Iinfect. 44: 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medmal.2013.10.002
  3. Sanchez B, Delgado S, Blanco-Miguez A, Lourenco A, Gueimonde M, Margolles A. 2017. Probiotics, gut microbiota, and their influence on host health and disease. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 61. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201600240. Epub 2016 Oct 10.
  4. Maria K, Dimitrios B, Stavroula K, Dimitra D, Konstantina G, Nikoletta S, et al. 2012. Health benefits of probiotics: A review. ISRN Nutr. 2013: 481651. https://doi.org/10.5402/2013/481651
  5. Yeo SY, Shin HS, Lee HW, Hong DS, Park HJ, Wilhelm H, et al. 2018. Additives to enhance the growth and survival of Lactobacillus salivarius determination of optimized growth medium and cryoprotective. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 28: 718-731. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1801.01059
  6. Lee JY, Han GG, Choi J, Jin GD, Kang SK, Chae BJ, et al. 2017. Pan-genomic approaches in Lactobacillus reuteri as a porcine probiotic: Investigation of host adaptation and antipathogenic activity. Microb. Ecol. 74: 709-721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-017-0977-z
  7. Champagne CP, Lacroix C, Sodini-Gallot I. 1994. Immobilized cell technologies for the dairy-industry. Crit. Rev. Biotechnol. 14: 109-134. https://doi.org/10.3109/07388559409086964
  8. Chandramouli V, Kailasapathy K, Peiris P, Jones M. 2004. An improved method of microencapsulation and its evaluation to protect Lactobacillus spp. in simulated gastric conditions. J. Microbiol. Methods 56: 27-35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mimet.2003.09.002
  9. Crittenden R, Weerakkody R, Sanguansri L, Augustin M. 2006. Synbiotic microcapsules that enhance microbial viability during nonrefrigerated storage and gastrointestinal transit. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72: 2280-2282. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.72.3.2280-2282.2006
  10. Burgain J, Gaiani C, Linder M, Scher J. 2011. Encapsulation of probiotic living cells: From laboratory scale to industrial applications. J. Food Eng. 104: 467-483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2010.12.031
  11. Kim WS, Cho CS, Hong L, Han GG, Kil BJ, Kang SK, et al. 2019. Oral delivery of probiotics using pH-sensitive phthalyl inulin tablets. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 29: 200-208. https://doi.org/10.4014/jmb.1811.11021
  12. Madene A, Jacquot M, Scher J, Desobry S. 2006. Flavour encapsulation and controlled release-a review. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 41: 1-21.
  13. Chen LY, Remondetto GE, Subirade M. 2006. Food protein-based materials as nutraceutical delivery systems. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 17: 272-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2005.12.011
  14. Heidebach T, Forst P, Kulozik U. 2009. Microencapsulation of probiotic cells by means of rennet-gelation of milk proteins. Food Hydrocolloid. 23: 1670-1677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2009.01.006
  15. Gil BJ, Yoo BS. 2015. Effect of salt addition on gelatinization and rheological properties of sweet potato starch-xanthan gum mixture. Starch - Starke 67: 117-123. https://doi.org/10.1002/star.201400103
  16. Hassanzadazar H, Ehsani A, Mardani K, Hesari J. 2012. Investigation of antibacterial, acid and bile tolerance properties of lactobacilli isolated from Koozeh cheese. In:. Veterinary Research Forum. Vet. Med. Forum. 3: 181-185.
  17. Ouwehand AC, Salminen SJ. 1998. The health effects of cultured milk products with viable and non-viable bacteria. Int. Dairy J. 8: 749-758. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-6946(98)00114-9
  18. Kebary KMK, Hussein SA, Badawi RM. 1998. Improving viability of bifidobacteria and their effect on frozen icemilk. Egypt. J. Dairy Sci. 26: 319-337.
  19. Krasaekoopt W, Bhandari B, Deeth H. 2003. Review: Evaluation of encapsulation techniques of probiotics for yogurt. Int. Dairy J. 13: 3-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0958-6946(02)00155-3
  20. Iyer C, Kailasapathy K. 2005. Effect of Co-encapsulation of probiotics with prebiotics on increasing the viability of encapsulated bacteria under in vitro acidic and bile salt conditions and in yogurt. J. Food Sci. 70: M18-M23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2005.tb09041.x
  21. Ding WK, Shah NP. 2007. Acid, bile, and heat tolerance of free and microencapsulated probiotic bacteria. J. Food Sci. 72: 446-450.
  22. Sahlan M, Pramadewi I. 2012. Nanoencapsulation of the flavonoids isolated from Phaleria macrocarpa leaf by casein micelle. Int. J. Pharm. Biol. Sci. 3: 472-478.
  23. Gardiner G, Ross RP, Collins JK, Fitzgerald G, Stanton C. 1998. Development of a probiotic Cheddar cheese containing humanderived Lactobacillus paracasei strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64: 2192-2199. https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.64.6.2192-2199.1998
  24. Dinakar P, Mistry VV. 1994. Growth and viability of Bifidobacterium bifidum in Cheddar cheese. J. Dairy Sci. 77: 2854-2864. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.s0022-0302(94)77225-8
  25. Dianawati D, Shah NP. 2011. Enzyme stability of microencapsulated Bifidobacterium animalis ssp. lactis Bb12 after freeze drying and during storage in low water activity at room temperature. J. Food Sci. 76: M463-M471. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02246.x