Journal of the Korean Chemical Society (대한화학회지)

Korean Chemical Society (대한화학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

An Exploration of Learning Environment for Promoting Conceptual Understanding, Immersion and Situational Interest in Small Group Learning Using Augmented Reality

증강현실을 활용한 소집단 학습에서 개념 이해 및 몰입, 상황 흥미를 촉진할 수 있는 학습 환경 탐색

  • Shin, Seokjin (Department of Chemistry Education, Seoul National University) ;
  • Noh, Taehee (Department of Chemistry Education, Seoul National University) ;
  • Lee, Jaewon (Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation)
  • Received : 2020.05.06
  • Accepted : 2020.07.27
  • Published : 2020.12.20
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study explored the learning environment for promoting conceptual understanding, immersion, and situational interest in small group learning using augmented reality, according to the level of students' self-regulation. 95 ninth-grade students from a coed high school in Seoul participated in this study. Students were divided into a group of four and each group was randomly assigned to three learning environments that provide one marker and one smart device(1-1), two markers and two smart devices(2-2), and four markers and four smart devices(4-4) for a group. Small group learning using augmented reality was conducted for two class periods about the chemical bonding concept from the Integrated Science subject. Two-way ANOVA results revealed that students in the 4-4 learning environment scored significantly higher than those in the 1-1 or 2-2 learning environment in a conception test. Changes in the learning environment have affected students with a low level of self-regulation. In an immersion test, students in the 4-4 learning environment scored significantly higher than those in the 1-1 learning environment, and changes in the learning environment have affected students with a high level of self-regulation. As a result of situational interest test, students in the 4-4 and 2-2 learning environments scored significantly higher than those in the 1-1 learning environment, and changes in the learning environment have affected students with a low and a high level of self-regulation. Based on the results, the educational implications of the learning environment for promoting conceptual understanding, immersion, and situational interest in small group learning using augmented reality are discussed.

이 연구에서는 증강현실을 활용한 소집단 학습에서 개념 이해 및 몰입, 상황 흥미를 촉진할 수 있는 학습 환경을 학생들의 자기조절 수준에 따라 탐색하였다. 서울시에 소재한 남녀공학 고등학교 1학년 95명이 연구에 참여하였다. 한 모둠에 마커와 스마트 기기를 각각 1개(1-1), 2개(2-2) 또는 4개(4-4)를 제공하는 세 가지 학습 환경을 구성하고, 학생들을 4인 1모둠으로 편성하여 각 학습 환경에 무선 배치하였다. 통합과학 교과의 화학 결합 개념에 대하여 증강현실을 활용한 소집단 학습을 2차시 동안 실시하였다. 이원 변량 분석 결과, 개념 이해도 검사에서는 4-4 학습 환경의 점수가 1-1 또는 2-2 학습 환경보다 유의미하게 높았으며, 자기조절 수준이 낮은 학생들이 학습 환경 변화의 영향을 받았다. 몰입감 검사에서는 4-4 학습 환경의 점수가 1-1 학습 환경보다 유의미하게 높았고, 자기조절 수준이 높은 학생들이 학습 환경 변화의 영향을 받았다. 상황 흥미 검사에서 4-4 및 2-2 학습 환경의 점수는 1-1 학습 환경보다 통계적으로 유의미하게 높았고, 학습 환경 변화는 자기조절 수준 높은 학생과 낮은 학생 모두에게 영향을 주었다. 연구 결과를 바탕으로 증강현실을 활용한 소집단 학습에서 학생들의 개념 이해 및 몰입, 상황 흥미를 촉진할 수 있는 학습 환경에 대한 교육적 함의를 논의하였다.

Keywords

References

  1. Azuma, R. T. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 1997, 6, 355. https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355
  2. Lukosch, S.; Billinghurst, M.; Alem, L.; Kiyokawa, K. Computer Supported Cooperative Work 2015, 24, 515. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-015-9239-0
  3. Chen, Y. C. A Study of Comparing the Use of Augmented Reality and Physical Models in Chemistry Education; Proceedings of the 2006 ACM international conference on Virtual reality continuum and its applications, New York, USA, 369-372, 2006.
  4. Science Level Up 2015; Korea Foundation for the Advancement of Science & Creativity; Seoul. [Online] https://sciencelevelup.kofac.re.kr/
  5. Jung, Y.; Sung, Y.; Lim, S.; Ryu, J.; Seo, H.; Ahn, H. A Study on the Implementation of Future Digital Textbooks. Korea Education & Research Information Service; Daegu, 2017, pp 25-44.
  6. Akcayir, M.; Akcayir, G. Educational Research Review 2017, 20, 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2016.11.002
  7. Phon, D. N. E.; Ali, M. B.; Halim, N. D. A. Collaborative Augmented Reality in Education: A Review; In 2014 International Conference on Teaching and Learning in Computing and Engineering, Kuching, Malaysia, 78-83, 2014.
  8. Yoo, M.; Kim, J.; Koo, H.; Song, J. The Journal of Educational Information and Media 2018, 24, 459.
  9. Diegmann, P.; Schmidt-Kraepelin, M.; Eynden, S.; Basten, D. Benefits 2015, 3, 1542.
  10. Ibanez, M. B.; Di Serio, A.; Villaran, D.; Kloos, C. D. Computers & Education 2014, 71, 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.004
  11. Kye, B.; Kim, Y. Journal of Educational Technology 2008, 24, 193. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.24.4.193
  12. Novak, T. P.; Hoffman, D. L. Interval Research Corporation 1997, 31, 1.
  13. Salmi, H.; Thuneberg, H.; Vainikainen, M. P. International Journal of Science Education 2017, 7, 253. https://doi.org/10.1080/0140528850070304
  14. Ko, Y.; Kim, C. Journal of the Korean Association of Information Education 2012, 16, 373.
  15. Nachairit, A.; Srisawasdi, N. Using Mobile Augmented Reality for Chemistry Learning of Acid-base Titration: Correlation Between Motivation and Perception; In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computers in Education, Hangzhou, China, 519-528, 2015.
  16. Nunez, M.; Quiros, R.; Nunez, I.; Carda, J. B.; Camahort, E.; Mauri, J. L. Collaborative Augmented Reality for Inorganic Chemistry Education; In WSEAS International Conference. Heraklion, Greece, 271-277, 2008.
  17. Li, N.; Gu, Y. X.; Chang, L.; Duh, H. B.-L. Influences of AR-supported Simulation on Learning Effectiveness in Face-to-face Collaborative Learning for Physics; In 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, Athens, GA, USA, 320-322, 2011.
  18. Baran, B.; Yecan, E.; Kaptan, B.; Pasayigit, O. Education and Information Technologies 2019, 25, 1371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10001-9
  19. Dalim, C. S. C.; Kolivand, H.; Kadhim, H.; Sunar, M. S.; Billinghurst, M. Journal of Computer Science 2017, 13, 581. https://doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2017.581.589
  20. Gweon, G.; Kim, B.; Kim, J.; Lee, K. J.; Rhim, J.; Choi, J. MABLE: Mediating Young Children's Smart Media Usage with Augmented Reality; In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, New York, USA, 1-9, 2018.
  21. Loyens, S. M.; Magda, J.; Rikers, R. M. Educational Psychology Review 2008, 20, 411. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9082-7
  22. Panadero, E.; Kirschner, P. A.; Jarvela, S.; Malmberg, J.; Jarvenoja, H. Small Group Research 2015, 46, 431. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496415591219
  23. Han, J.; Noh, T.; Lee, J.; Lee., H. The Journal of Yeolin Education 2006, 14, 103.
  24. Panitz, T. Ted's Cooperative Learning e-book. Abruf am, 2001. [Online] https://tpanitz.jimdofree.com/ted-s-coop-learning-ebook/
  25. Lee, J.; Sim, H.; Kim, K.; Lee, K. Theory and Practice of Education 2010, 15, 99.
  26. Chiang, T. H. C.; Yang, S. J. H.; Hwang, G.-J. Computers & Education 2014, 78, 97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.05.006
  27. Dunleavy, M. TechTrends 2014, 58, 28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-013-0717-2
  28. Pintrich, P. R.; Smith, D. A.; Garcia, T.; McKeachie, W. J. Educational and Psychological Measurement 1993, 53, 801. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053003024
  29. Tan, D. K. C.; Treagust, D. F. School Science Review 1999, 81, 75.
  30. Coll, R. K.; Treagust, D. F; Research in Science Education 2001, 31, 357. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1013159927352
  31. Unal, S.; Calik, M.; Ayas, A.; Coll, R. K. Research in Science & Technological Education 2006, 24, 141. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140600811536
  32. White, R. T.; Gunstone, R. F. Probing Understanding. Falmer Press: London, UK, 1992.
  33. Jackson, S. A.; Marsh, H. Wearning. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology 1996, 18, 17. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.18.1.17
  34. Seo, H. Journal of Korean Association for Educational Information and Media 2008, 14, 137.
  35. Chen, A.; Darst, P. W.; Pangrazi, R. P. British Journal of Educational Psychology 2001, 71, 383. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709901158578
  36. Kang, H.; Kim, M.; Noh, T. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education 2007, 27, 18.
  37. Seong, T. Modern Basic Statistics: Understanding and Application. Hakjisa: Seoul, 2013.
  38. Saks, K.; Leijen, A. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 2014, 112, 190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1155
  39. Kim, M. J. Automation in Construction 2013, 33, 79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2012.10.020
  40. Georgiou, Y.; Kyza, E. A. In Proceedings of the 16th World Conference on Mobile and Contextual Learning 2017, 1.
  41. Reilly, M.; Shen, H. Shared Note-taking: a Smartphonebased Approach to Increased Student Engagement in Lectures; In The 11th International Workshop on Collaborative Editing Systems in Conjunction with ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, Hangzhou, China, 1-9, 2011.
  42. Zimmerman, H. T.; Land, S. M.; Jung, Y. J. Using Augmented Reality to Support Children's Situational Interest and Science Learning During Context-Sensitive Informal Mobile Learning. In: Pena-Ayala A., Eds.; Mobile, Ubiquitous, and Pervasive Learning, Springer, Cham, 2016; p 101.