DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Impact of Technology Innovation Capacity and Social Capital on Non-Financial Performance - For small and medium-sized businesses in the metropolitan area -

기술혁신역량과 사회적 자본이 비재무성과에 미치는 영향 - 수도권 중소기업을 대상으로 -

  • Ryu, Gil-Ho (Department of Convergence Industry, Seoul Venture University) ;
  • Yi, Seon-Gyu (Department of Convergence Industry, Seoul Venture University)
  • 류길호 (서울벤처대학원대학교 융합산업학과) ;
  • 이선규 (서울벤처대학원대학교 융합산업학과)
  • Received : 2019.10.07
  • Accepted : 2019.11.20
  • Published : 2019.11.28

Abstract

This study analyzed the effect of technology innovation capacity and social capital on the non-financial performance of SMEs in the metropolitan area. Technology innovation capacity is defined as R & D capacity and technology accumulation capacity, and social capital is defined as interaction, goal sharing, and member trust. The samples were collected through a survey conducted in-person and through telephone calls, e-mail, and fax. The sample data used for analysis was 223 copies. Analysis results showed that R & D capacity and technology accumulation capacity (for technology innovation capacity) and interaction and member trust (for social capital) were variables that significantly affect non-financial performance, but not goal sharing. The findings of this study were as follows. First, despite lacking sufficient technology or capital, SMEs are constantly engaging in innovation to survive in the competitive market environment. Second, the members of SMEs make considerable efforts to achieve performance based on interaction and member trust, however, they hold a negative perception toward sharing the goals pursued by their company.

본 연구는 수도권에 있는 중소기업을 대상으로 기업의 기술혁신역량과 사회적 자본이 기업의 비 재무적 성과에 미치는 영향을 분석하였다. 기술혁신역량은 연구개발역량과 기술축적역량으로 정의하였고, 사회적 자본은 상호작용, 목표공유, 구성원 신뢰로 정의하였다. 표본 자료는 설문조사 방법을 이용하여 방문, 전화 통화, 전자메일, 팩스 등의 방법으로 진행하였다. 분석에 활용된 표본 자료는 223부였다. 분석결과, 기술혁신역량의 연구개발역량과 기술축적역량은 비 재무적 성과에 유의미한 영향을 미치는 변수로 분석되었고, 사회적 자본의 상호작용, 구성원 신뢰 요인도 비 재무적 성과에 유의미한 영향을 미치는 변수로 분석되었으나 목표공유는 비 재무적 성과에 유의미한 영향을 미치지 않는 것으로 검증되었다. 분석 결과를 바탕으로 본 연구에서는 다음과 같은 추론을 할 수 있었다. 첫째, 중소기업들은 기술력이나 자본력이 취약함에도 불구하고 치열한 시장환경에서 살아남기 위하여 끊임없는 기술혁신 활동을 하고 있는 것으로 추론할 수 있었고, 둘째, 중소기업의 구성원들은 상호작용과 구성원들 간의 신뢰를 바탕으로 기업의 성과를 이루고자 많은 노력을 하고 있는 것으로 추론할 수 있었다. 그러나 구성원들은 기업이 추구하는 목표 공유에는 부정적인 측면이 있음을 알 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. N. Tomsic, S. Bojnec & B. Simcic. (2015). Corporate sustainability and economic performance in small and medium sized enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 603-612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.08.106
  2. E. Cefis & O. Marsili. (2008). Survivor: .The role of innovation in firms' survival. Research Policy, 35(5), 626-641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.02.006
  3. J. M. Utterback & W. J. Abernathy. (1975). A Dynamic Model of Process and Product Innovation, Omega, 3(6), 639-656. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(75)90068-7
  4. J. H. Park. (2017). A Study on the Effect of Patent and Technology Innovation Capacity of Korean Export Firms on Corporate Performance-Focusing on the Mediating Effect of Technology Commercialization Capability and Patent Utilization Level-. Doctoral Dissertation, Graduate School of Chung-Ang University.
  5. S. A. Zahra & G. George. (2002). Absorptive capacity: A review, reconceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185-203. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.6587995
  6. H. Tidd & J. Bessant. (2009). Managing Innovation: Integration Technological, Market and Organizational Change, 4th Edition. New York: john Wiley & Sons.
  7. L. E. Westphal & L. Kim & C. J. Dahlman. (2005). Reflections on the Republic of Korea's acquisition of technological capability In: N. Roseberg and C. Frischtak(eds.). International Technology Transfer: Concepts, Measures and Comparison. New York, Praeger, 167-221.
  8. D. S. Lee & R. C. Jung. (2010). A Study on the Effect of Technology Innovation Capability and Technology Commercialization Capability of Korean SMEs on Management Performance. SME Research, 32(1), 65-87.
  9. S. J. Yoo. (2010). Fostering Local SMEs in Digital Age. e-Business Research, 11(1), 267-286.
  10. J. S. Choi & H. J. Kim. (2010). Innovation Capability Analysis and Implications of Leading Game Industry. Korea Academic Society of Games, Korea Game Society, 10(5), 51-63.
  11. R. A. Burgelman, C. M. Christensen & S. C. Wheelwright. (2014). Strategic Management of Technology and Innovation. Fifth edition, New York: McGraw-Hill.
  12. G. Karagouni & M. Kalesi. (2011). Knowledge intensive entrepreneurship and dynamic capabilities in low-tech SMEs: Evidence from the Greek food sector. MIBES Transaction on Line Electronic Version, 5, 1-19.
  13. T. K. Seong. (2012). Technology Marketing as a Means of Technology Commercialization. Intellectual Property Research, 7(3), 101-129. https://doi.org/10.34122/jip.2012.09.7.3.101
  14. D. Czarnitzki & K. Kraft. (2004). An empirical test of the asymmetric models on innovative activity: who invests more into R&D, the incumbent or the challenger?. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 54(2), 153-173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2003.01.008
  15. H. K. Bowen, K. B. Clark, S. C. Wheelwright & C. A. Hollow way. (1994). Oxford University Press, UK : The Perceptual Enterprise Machine.
  16. I. Nonaka & H. Takeuchi. (1995). The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press.
  17. W. M. Cohen, R. N. Richard & J. P. Walsh. (2000), Protecting their Intellectual Assets: Appropriatability Conditions and Why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent(or Not). Working Paper, 7552.
  18. T. M. Lang, S. H. Lin & T. N. T. Vy. (2012). Mediate effect of technology innovation capabilities investment capability and firm performance in Vietnam. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 40, 817-829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.03.267
  19. G. S. Han, J. W. Kim & J. H. Choi. (2007). The Relationship between Characteristics and Benefits of Networks between Companies: For small and medium-sized businesses in industrial clusters. SME Research, 29(1), 137-142.
  20. R. D. Putnam. (1995). Bowling Along: America's Declining Social Capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 6-78. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1995.0002
  21. J. Nahapiet & S. Ghoshal. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.533225
  22. S. C. Yoo & M. H. Chang. (2002). Social Capital and Korean Society, Social Development. Social Development Research, 87-104.
  23. P. Bourdieu. (1989). The forms of capital, in J, G, Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education: New York: Greenwood.
  24. H. B. Park. (2011). Social Capital. ChoMyeong MoonWhaSa: Seoul.
  25. B. J. Koo. (2011). A Study on the Impact of Corporate Social Capital on Financial Performance. Doctoral Dissertation, Graduate School of Kyungwon University.
  26. H. K. Lim. (2004). A Study on the Relationship between Civil Organization Leadership and Organizational Social Capital: A Case Study of Daejeon. Doctoral Dissertation, Graduate School of Daejeon University.
  27. S. B. Lee. (2013). A Study on the Effect of Social Capital of Entrepreneurs in Small and Medium Venture Businesses on Entrepreneurship Performance: Based on the Behavior of Early Entrepreneurs. Doctoral Dissertation, Graduate School of Konkuk University.
  28. P. Mattessich & B. Monsey. (1997). Community building: What makes it work. A Review of Factors Influencing Successful Community Building. Amherst H. Wilder Foundation.
  29. F. Fukuyama. (1995). Trust: Social Virtues and the Creation of Prosperity. New York: Free Press.
  30. S. I. Lee. (2017). Transformational Leadership, Internal Entrepreneurship, Performance Relationships and Moderating Effects of Social Capital: Cooperatives. Doctoral Dissertation, Graduate School of Sangji University.
  31. P. S. Alder & S. W. Kwon. (2010). Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17-40. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2002.5922314
  32. G. G. Nam. (2007). Issues of Empirical Research on the Formation and Effect of Social Capital. Government Studies, 13(4), 297-336.
  33. J. H. Choi. (2010). The Impact of Hotel Employee Value Agenda on Customer Orientation and Financial Performance. Doctoral Dissertation, Graduate School of Kyonggi University.
  34. H. D. Yoon & R. B. Seo. (2011). A Study on Key Factors on the Technology Management Performance of Inno-Biz SMEs. Journal of Technology Innovation, 19(1), 111-144.
  35. G. B. Murphy, J. W. Trailer & R. C. Hill. (1993). Measuring Performance in Entrepreneurship Research. Journal of Business Research, 36, 15-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(95)00159-X
  36. S. H. Barr, T. E. D. Baker, S. K. Markham & A. I. Kingon. (2009). Bridging the valley of death: Lessons learned from 14 years of commercialization of technology education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8(3), 370-388. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMLE.2009.44287937
  37. S. Ren, A. B. Eisingerich & H. T. Tsai. (2015). How do marketing, research and development capabilities, and degree of internationalization synergistically affect the innovation performance of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)?. A panel data study of Chinese SMEs. International Business Review, 24(4), 642-651. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2014.11.006
  38. Z. Jian & C. Wang. (2013). The impacts of network competence, knowledge sharing on service innovation performance: Moderating role of relationship quality. In LISS 2012, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
  39. P. Hortinha, C. Lages & L. Filipe Lages. (2011). The trade-off between customer and technology orientations: impact on innovation capabilities and export performance. Journal of International Marketing, 19(3), 36-58. https://doi.org/10.1509/jimk.19.3.36
  40. Q. Xu, J. Chen, Z. Xie, J. Liu, G. Zheng & Y. Wang. (2007). Total Innovation Management: a novel paradigm of innovation management in the 21st century. Journal of Technology Transfer, 32(1-2), 9-25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-006-9007-x
  41. W. J. Song. (2013). Social and Technology System Theory, Science and Technology Innovation Policy. Journal of Technology Innovation Society, 16(1), 156-175.
  42. Y. H. Lee & S. K. Shim. (2007). A Study on the Growth Model Discrimination Model of SMEs. SME Research, 29(2), 23-39.
  43. J. S. Coleman. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, M.A: Harvard University Press.