DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A retrospective clinical investigation for the effectiveness of closed reduction on nasal bone fracture

  • Kang, Byung-Hun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Kang, Hyo-Sun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Han, Jeong Joon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Jung, Seunggon (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Park, Hong-Ju (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Oh, Hee-Kyun (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, Chonnam National University) ;
  • Kook, Min-Suk (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, School of Dentistry, Dental Science Research Institute, Chonnam National University)
  • Received : 2019.07.02
  • Accepted : 2019.10.16
  • Published : 2019.12.31

Abstract

Background: The nasal bone is the most protruding bony structure of the facial bones. Nasal bone fracture is the most common facial bone fracture. The high rate of incidence of nasal bone fracture emphasizes the need for systematical investigation of epidemiology, surgical techniques, and complications after surgery. The objective of this study is to investigate the current trends in the treatment of nasal bone fractures and the effectiveness of closed reduction depending on the severity of the nasal bone fracture. Patients and methods: A total of 179 patients with a nasal bone fracture from 2009 to 2017 were enrolled. Their clinical examination, patient's records, and radiographic images of nasal bone fractures were evaluated. Results: Patients ranged from children to elderly. There were 156 (87.2%) males and 23 (12.8%) females. Traffic accident (36.9%) was the most common cause of nasal fracture. Orbit fracture (44 patients, 24.6%) was the most common fracture associated with a nasal bone fracture. Complications after surgery included postoperative deformity in 20 (11.2%) patients, nasal obstruction in 11 (6.1%) patients, and olfactory disturbances in 2 (1.1%) patients and patients with more severe nasal bone fractures had higher rates of these complications. Conclusion: Closed reduction could be performed successfully within 2 weeks after injury.

Keywords

References

  1. Muraoka M, Nakai Y (1998) Twenty years of statistics and observation of facial bone fracture. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 538:261-265
  2. Murray JAM, Maran AGD, Mackenzie IJ (1984) Open versus closed reduction of the fractured nose. Acta Otolaryngol Suppl 110:797-802
  3. Hwang K, You SH, Kim SG, Lee SI (2006) analysis of nasal bone fractures; a six-year study of 503 patients. J Craniofac Surg 17(2):261-264 https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-200603000-00010
  4. Harrison HD (1979) Nasal injuries: their pathogenesis and treatment. Br J Plast Surg 32(1):57-64 https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-1226(79)90063-8
  5. Murray JAM, Maran AGD (1980) The treatment of nasal injuries by manipulation. J Laryngol Otol e94(12):1405-1410 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022215100090241
  6. Higuera S, Lee E, Cole P, Hollier LH Jr, Stal S (2007) Nasal trauma and the deviated nose. Plast Reconstr Surg 120(7 Suppl 2):64S-75S https://doi.org/10.1097/01.prs.0000260722.91183.50
  7. Jazibi B (1977) Subluxation of the nasal septum in the newborn: etiology, diagnosis and treatment. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 10(1):125-138 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0030-6665(20)32656-6
  8. Oh HK, Kook MS, Park HJ, Ryu SY (2008) A recent 5-year retrospective study on nasal bone fracture. J Kor Oral Maxillofac Surg 34:230-236
  9. Fornazieri MA, Yamaguti HY, Moreira JH, Navarro PL, Heshiki RE, Takemoto LE (2008) Fracture of nasal bones: an epidemiologic analysis. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol Sao Paulo 12(4):498-501
  10. Turvey TA (1977) Midfacial fractures: a retrospective analysis of 593 cases. J Oral Surg 35(11):887-891
  11. Nishioka H, Kondoh S, Yuzuriha S (2018) Convex bone deformity after closed reduction of nasal bone fracture. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 71:85-89 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2017.08.022
  12. Hwang K, Ki SJ, Ko SH (2017) Etiology of nasal bone fractures. J Craniofac Surg 28(3):785-788 https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000003477
  13. Yang IS, Yeo HH, Kim YG, Byun YR (1994) A clinical study of the nasal bone fractures. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 16(4):419-427
  14. Rohrich RJ, Adams WP Jr (2000) Nasal fracture management: minimizing secondary nasal deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 106(2):266-273 https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200008000-00003
  15. Goode RL, Spooner TR (1972) Management of nasal fracture in children. A review of current practices. Clin Pediatr (Phila) 11(9):526-529 https://doi.org/10.1177/000992287201100915
  16. Han YY, Han DG (2016) Delayed reduction of nasal bone fractures. Arch Craniofac Surg 17(2):51-55 https://doi.org/10.7181/acfs.2016.17.2.51
  17. Hwang K, Yeom SH, Hwang SH (2017) Complications of nasal bone fractures. J Craniofac Surg 28(3):803-805 https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000003482
  18. Escada P (2013) Localization and distribution of human olfactory mucosa in the nasal cavities. Acta Med Port 26(3):200-207
  19. Wrobel BB, Leopold DA (2005) Olfactory and sensory attributes of the nose. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 38(6):1163-1170 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2005.07.006

Cited by

  1. Etiology, pattern, and treatment of nose fractures: A 10-year cross-sectional cohort retrospective study vol.24, pp.11, 2021, https://doi.org/10.4103/njcp.njcp_52_21
  2. Complications After Inadequate Treatment of Nasal Bone Fracture Combined With Septal Fracture: A Case Report vol.28, pp.3, 2021, https://doi.org/10.18787/jr.2021.00352