International Journal of Industrial Entomology and Biomaterials

Korean Society of Sericultural Science (한국잠사학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Comparison of the biodegradability in the membranes for the guided bone regeneration: preliminary study

  • Lee, Chang-Hyeon (Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University) ;
  • Kang, Yei-Jin (Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University) ;
  • Jo, You-Young (Sericultural and Apicultural Division, National Institute of Agricultural Science, RDA) ;
  • Kweon, HaeYong (Sericultural and Apicultural Division, National Institute of Agricultural Science, RDA) ;
  • Kim, Seong-Gon (Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, College of Dentistry, Gangneung-Wonju National University)
  • Received : 2019.07.11
  • Accepted : 2019.08.27
  • Published : 2019.09.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In this study, 4 different types of GBR membrane were undergone for bio-degradability test; Silk mat from silkworm cocoon (TDI), silk mat from flatwise-spun (FS), collagen membrane (OssGuide), and dPTFE membrane (Cytoplast). Each material was segmented in 10.00 mm length and 0.3 mm thickness. The samples were put into the normal saline at $37^{\circ}C$ for 2 weeks. After that, yield strength and tensile strain were measured and compared them with those of before treatment. The morphology of the membranes was observed by SEM. Tensile strain of FS was significantly increased at 2 weeks' normal saline treatment (P=0.018). When compared to OssGuide, TDI and FS showed significantly higher tensile strain at 2 weeks' normal saline treatment (P<0.05). In the SEM images, there were no significant changes in Cytoplast, TDI, and FS after 2 weeks' treatment. However, OssGuide showed damaged surface after 2 weeks' treatment. In conclusion, both TDI and FS did not have any evidence of biodegradability at 2 weeks' observation in normal saline treatment. However, OssGuide showed more than 20 % decrease in yield strength and tensile strain.

Keywords

References

  1. Cao Y, Wang B (2009) Biodegradation of silk biomaterials. Int J Mol Sci 10(4), 1514-1524. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms10041514
  2. Charlebois M, McKee MD, Buschmann MD (2004) Nonlinear tensile properties of bovine articular cartilage and their variation with age and depth. J Biomech Eng 126(2), 129-137. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.1688771
  3. FDA (1996) Guidance Document for Testing Biodegradable Polymer Implant Devices. https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/search-fda-guidance-documents/guidance-document-testingbiodegradable-polymer-implant-devices accessed at July 9, 2019.
  4. Grover CN, Gwynne JH, Pugh N, Hamaia S, Farndale RW, Best SM, et al. (2012) Crosslinking and composition influence the surface properties, mechanical stiffness and cell reactivity of collagen-based films. Acta Biomater 8(8), 3080-3090. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2012.05.006
  5. Ha YY, Park YW, Kweon H, Jo YY, Kim SG (2014) Comparison of the physical properties and in vivo bioactivities of silkworm-cocoon- derived silk membrane, collagen membrane, and polytetrafluoroethylene membrane for guided bone regeneration. Macromol Res 22, 1018-1023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13233-014-2138-2
  6. Jansen JA, de Ruijter JE, Janssen PT, Paquay YG (1995) Histological evaluation of a biodegradable Polyactive/hydroxyapatite membrane. Biomaterials 16(11), 819-827. https://doi.org/10.1016/0142-9612(95)94142-8
  7. Jo YY, Kweon H, Kim DW, Baek K, Kim MK, Kim SG, et al. (2017) Bone regeneration is associated with the concentration of tumour necrosis factor-${\alpha}$ induced by sericin released from a silk mat. Sci Rep 7, 15589. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15687-w
  8. Kafedjiiski K, Foger F, Hoyer H, Bernkop-Schnurch A, Werle M (2007) Evaluation of in vitro enzymatic degradation of various thiomers and cross-linked thiomers. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 33(2), 199-208. https://doi.org/10.1080/03639040600762651
  9. Kang YJ, Jo YY, Kweon HY, Chae WS, Yang WG, Garagiola U, et al. (2019) Comparison of the physical properties and in vivo bioactivities of flatwise-spun silk mats and cocoon-derived silk mats for guided bone regeneration. Macromol Res (In press).
  10. Karapataki S, Hugoson A, Falk H, Laurell L, Kugelberg CF (2000) Healing following GTR treatment of intrabony defects distal to mandibular 2nd molars using resorbable and non-resorbable barriers. J Clin Periodontol 27, 333-340. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051x.2000.027005333.x
  11. Kim JW, Jo YY, Kim JY, Oh J, Yang BE, Kim SG (2019a) Clinical study for silk mat application into extraction socket: A split-mouth, randomized clinical trial. Appl Sci 9, 1208. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9061208
  12. Kim JW, Jo YY, Kim JY, Oh JH, Yang BE, Kim SG (2019b) Retrospective comparative clinical study for silk mat application into extraction socket. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 41, 16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-019-0199-z
  13. Kim SG, Kim MK, Kweon H, Jo YY, Lee KG, Lee JK (2016) Comparison of unprocessed silk cocoon and silk cocoon middle layer membranes for guided bone regeneration. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 38, 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-016-0057-1
  14. Kweon HY, Jo YY, Seok H, Kim SG, Chae WS, Sapru S, et al. (2017) In vivo bone regeneration ability of different layers of natural silk cocoon processed using an eco-friendly method. Macromol Res 25, 806-816. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13233-017-5085-x
  15. Mondal M, Trivedy K, Kumar SN (2007) The silk proteins, sericin and fibroin in silkworm, Bombyx mori Linn.,- a review. Caspian J Env Sci 5(2), 63-76.
  16. Reed EJ, Bianchini LL, Viney C (2012) Sample selection, preparation methods, and the apparent tensile properties of silkworm (B. mori) cocoon silk. Biopolymers 97(6), 397-407. https://doi.org/10.1002/bip.22005
  17. Sethuraman S, Nair LS, El-Amin S, Farrar R, Nguyen MT, Singh A, et al. (2006) In vivo biodegradability and biocompatibility evaluation of novel alanine ester based polyphosphazenes in a rat model. J Biomed Mater Res A 77(4), 679-687.
  18. Yoo CK, Jeon JY, Kim YJ, Kim SG, Hwang KG (2016) Cell attachment and proliferation of osteoblast-like MG63 cells on silk fibroin membrane for guided bone regeneration. Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg 38, 17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-016-0062-4
  19. Zhang Y, Zhao P, Dong Z, Wang D, Guo P, Guo X, et al. (2015) Comparative proteome analysis of multi-layer cocoon of the silkworm, Bombyx mori. PLoS One 10(4), e0123403. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0123403