DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A study on the current status and development of the new health technology assessment of Korean medicine field

한의 신의료기술 평가 활성화 방안 제언

  • Park, Minjung (Guideline Center for Korean Medicine, National Institute for Korean Medicine Development) ;
  • Jung, Youjin (Division of Health Technology Assessment Research, National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency) ;
  • Son, Soo Kyung (Division of Health Technology Assessment Research, National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency) ;
  • Kwon, Soohyun (Guideline Center for Korean Medicine, National Institute for Korean Medicine Development) ;
  • Kim, Nankwen (Guideline Center for Korean Medicine, National Institute for Korean Medicine Development) ;
  • Kim, Jong Woo (Guideline Center for Korean Medicine, National Institute for Korean Medicine Development) ;
  • Park, Dong Ah (Division of Health Technology Assessment Research, National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency) ;
  • Chung, Seok-Hee (Guideline Center for Korean Medicine, National Institute for Korean Medicine Development)
  • 박민정 (한국한의약진흥원 한의표준임상진료지침 개발사업단) ;
  • 정유진 (한국보건의료연구원 보건의료근거연구본부) ;
  • 손수경 (한국보건의료연구원 보건의료근거연구본부) ;
  • 권수현 (한국한의약진흥원 한의표준임상진료지침 개발사업단) ;
  • 김남권 (한국한의약진흥원 한의표준임상진료지침 개발사업단) ;
  • 김종우 (한국한의약진흥원 한의표준임상진료지침 개발사업단) ;
  • 박동아 (한국보건의료연구원 보건의료근거연구본부) ;
  • 정석희 (한국한의약진흥원 한의표준임상진료지침 개발사업단)
  • Received : 2019.05.28
  • Accepted : 2019.08.14
  • Published : 2019.09.01

Abstract

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to examine the current status of Korean medicine health technology assessment and explore realistic plans to activate it. Methods: We investigated all the applications for new health technology assessment related to Korean medicine from 2007 to 2016. The several expert meetings were held to draw out the barriers and improvement strategies of the new health technology assessment of Korean medicine field. Results: There were 31 cases in total except for duplications or reapplies falling into 3 main types. First, 19 of them were to try to enter a medical market and be covered by National Health Insurance. Eight cases were to apply western medicine technology as new health technology in Korean medicine area. The rest was 4 cases, which were totally not appropriate for the purpose of new health technology assessment system. According to the expert opinion, the obstacles of activation in new health technology assessment of Korean medicine were application of unstandardized technology, lack of understanding and experience, lack of clinical trial supporting system for Korean medicine, lack of committee members within the nHTA(new Health Technology Assessment) review board, ambiguous definition of medical practice and sharp conflict between western medicine and Korean medicine. Conclusions: Several suggestions were derived. First of all, to activate Korean medicine in the nHTA system, the existing system should be used sufficiently, and multifaceted efforts are needed to upgrade the system, if necessary. Also, self-help efforts, Korean medicine clinical trial supporting system and increasing R&D investment, establishing extra-committee for Korean medicine in nHTA could be needed. Finally, long-term strategy for improving collaboration between Korean medicine and western medicine should be considered.

Keywords

References

  1. Lee M, Ahn J.H. The current status and future direction of Korean health technology assessment system. J Korean Med Assoc. 2014. 57(11): p. 906-911. https://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2014.57.11.906
  2. Shin, Y.S. Policy Development for the Management of New Health Technologies, Ministry of Health & Welfare. 1999.
  3. Lee, S.M. Status of New Health Technology in Korean. Journal of the Korean Academy of Dental Insurance, 2011: p. 9-30.
  4. Han C.H, Park H.J, Lee B.H, Lee Y.J, Kwon O.M. Study on the Present Status and Developments of New Health Technologies of Traditional Korean Medicine. Korean Journal of Acupuncture, 2012. 29(2): p. 315-326.
  5. Lee Y.J, Kim J.Y, Status of New Health Technology in Korean Medicine Field Since 2007. Journal of Korean Medicine, 2017. 38(1): p. 21-33. https://doi.org/10.13048/jkm.17003
  6. Lee B.H, Lee Y.J, Park H.J, Kwon O.M, Han C.H, A Survey on the Actual State of Recognition of New Health Technology. Korean Journal of Acupuncture, 2012. 29(2):p. 327-342.
  7. Lee S.N, Lee B.H, Lee Y.J, Han C.H. Telephone Survey for Actual State of Recognition of New Health Technology in Korean Medical Doctors Kor. J. Oriental Preventive Medical Society, 2013. 17(2): p. 89-103.

Cited by

  1. 한의 외래 비급여 진료비의 연도별 추이 vol.24, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.25153/spkom.2020.24.2.003
  2. 한의학증례보고에서 가치 있는 증례는 무엇일까? vol.37, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.14406/acu.2020.021