DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Functioning Characteristics of Patients with Neck Pain: ICF Concept Based

  • Lee, HaeJung (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health and Welfare, Silla University) ;
  • Song, JuMin (Department of Physical Therapy, College of Health and Welfare, Silla University)
  • Received : 2019.07.08
  • Accepted : 2019.08.29
  • Published : 2019.08.31

Abstract

Purpose: This study examine the functioning level and quality of life (QoL) of people with non-specific neck pain and neck pain with radiculopathy using the neck disability index (NDI), functional rating index (FRI), and short form of health survey 36 (SF-36) and each of linked lCF code lists of those scales. Methods: Each item of the NDI, FRI, and SF-36 were linked conceptually to the ICF code, and the lCF code lists of those scales were produced as iNDI, iFRI, and iSF-36, respectively. Seventy-nine patients with neck pain filled the instruments and its linked ICF code lists. The subjects were divided into two groups based on the diagnosis, non-specific neck pain (Group1), and neck pain with radiculopathy (Group2). A group comparison was performed using an independent t-test. The Pearson correlation coefficient was also used to analyze the relationships between each scale and the linked ICF code list. Results: The participants in Group 2 experienced more difficulties in their daily activities than those in Group 2 when examined in NDI and FRI (p<0.05). This result was also found consistently in the ICF code lists, iNDI and iFRI (p=0.05). On the other hand, the QoL did not show a difference between groups (p=0.06). A strong correlation was observed between the instruments and linked ICF code lists: NDI and iNDI (r=0.90), FRI and iFRI (r=0.91), and SF-36 and iSF-36 (r=-0.61). Conclusion: These findings suggest that the concept of each item in NDI and FRI could be linked to the ICF codes when examining patients with neck pain, but the items of SF-36 were found to be linked and expressed in ICF.

Keywords

References

  1. Strine TW, HootmanJ M. Us national prevalence and correlates of low back and neck pain among adults. Arthritis Rheu. 2007;57(4):656-65. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.22684
  2. Borghouts JA, Koes BW, Bouter LM. The clinical course and prognostic factors of non-specific neck pain: A systematic review. Pain. 1998; 77(1):1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3959(98)00058-X
  3. Waddell G. The back pain revolution. 2nd. London, Churchill Livingstone, 2004.
  4. Hoy D, March L, Woolf A et al. The global burden of neck pain: Estimates from the global burden of disease 2010 study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(7):1309-15. https://doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-204431
  5. Council. NR. Musculoskeletal disorders and the workplace. Washington D.C. National Academies Press. 2001.
  6. Bobos P, MacDermid JC, Walton DM et al. Patient-reported outcome measures used for neck disorders: An overview of systematic reviews. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2018;48(10):775-88. https://doi.org/10.2519/jospt.2018.8131
  7. Bai Z, Shu T, Lu J et al. Measurement properties of the functional rating index: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine. 2018;43(22): E1340-E9. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000002690
  8. Le J, Dorstyn DS, Mpfou E et al. Health-related quality of life in coronary heart disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis mapped against the international classification of functioning, disability and health. Qual Life Res. 2018;27(10):2491-503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1885-5
  9. Ware JE. Sf-36 health survey update. Spine. 2000;25(24):3130-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00008
  10. Organization WHO. How to use the ICF: a practical manual for using the international classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF) : Exposure draft for comment. Geneva, WHO, 2013.
  11. van Dulmen SA, van der Wees PJ, Bart Staal J et al. Patient reported outcome measures (proms) for goalsetting and outcome measurement in primary care physiotherapy, an explorative field study. Physiotherapy. 2017;103(1):66-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2016.01.001
  12. Prodinger B, Tennant A, Stucki G. Standardized reporting of functioning information on icf-based common metrics. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2018;54(1):110-7.
  13. Lee HJ, Song JM. Linking of items in two function-related questionnaires to the international classification of functioning, disability and health: Shoulder pain. J Kor Phys Ther. 2018;30(6):239-45. https://doi.org/10.18857/jkpt.2018.30.6.239
  14. Lee H, Nicholson LL, Adams RD et al. Development and psychometric testing of korean language versions of 4 neck pain and disability questionnaires. Spine. 2006;31(16):1841-5. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000227268.35035.a5
  15. Cieza A, Geyh S, Chatterji S et al. ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learned. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37(4):212-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/16501970510040263
  16. Ferreira M, Borges B, Rezende I et al. Are neck pain scales and questionnaires compatible with the international classification of functioning, disability and health? A systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(19): 1539-46. https://doi.org/10.3109/09638281003611045
  17. Lee HJ, Song JM. Mapping items of functioning questionnaires into the international classification of functioning, disability and health: low back pain. J Kor Phys Ther. 2016;28(5):321-7. https://doi.org/10.18857/jkpt.2016.28.5.321
  18. Song JM, Lee HJ. Mapping items of functioning questionnaires into the international classification of functioning, disability and health: Stroke. J Kor Phys Ther. 2016;28(5):341-7. https://doi.org/10.18857/jkpt.2016.28.5.341

Cited by

  1. Effect of a Five-week Scapular Correction Exercise in Patients with Chronic Mechanical Neck Pain vol.32, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.18857/jkpt.2020.32.2.126
  2. A Review of Domestic Research Trends Related to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF): 2015-2020 vol.16, pp.3, 2019, https://doi.org/10.13066/kspm.2021.16.3.65
  3. Review on ICF-related Research Trends in Korean Clinical Field vol.16, pp.4, 2019, https://doi.org/10.13066/kspm.2021.16.4.33