References
- 교육부 (2015a). 과학과 교육과정. 교육부 고시 제2015-74호 [별책9]. 서울 : 교육부.
- National Research Council(NRC). (2010). Standards for K-12 engineering education?. National Academies Press.
- Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., Orton, K., Jona, K., Trouille, L., &Wilensky, U. (2016). Defining computational thinking for mathematics and science classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25 (1), 127-147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9581-5
- 최숙영 (2016). 문제해결의 관점에서 컴퓨팅 사고력 증진을 위한 교수학습에 대한 연구. 컴퓨터교육학회논문지, 19(1), 53-62. https://doi.org/10.32431/KACE.2016.19.1.006
- Wing, J. (2006). Computational thinking. Communications of the ACM, 49 (3), 33-35. https://doi.org/10.1145/1118178.1118215
- Wing, J. (2008). Computational thinking and thinking about computing. Philosophical transactions of the royal society of London A: mathematical, physical and engineering sciences, 366 (1881), 3717-3725. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2008.0118
- Lockwood, J., & Mooney, A. (2017). Computational thinking in education: Where does it fit? A systematic literary review. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.07659. Retrieved from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/856e/ed bf3ad4902e86ba94ab8dd124e6a1495889.pdf
- 정웅열.이영준 (2018). SW.수학.과학 융합형 교수.학습 자료에 나타난 교육과정 성취기준 내용 분석. 컴퓨터교육학회논문지, 21(5), 11-23. https://doi.org/10.32431/kace.2018.21.5.002
- National Research Council (NRC). (2000). Inquiry in the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
- Chinn, C., & Malhotra, B. (2002). Epistemologically authentic inquiry in schools: A theoretical framework for evaluating inquiry tasks. Science Education, 86 (2), 175-218. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10001
- Bybee, R., Carlson-Powell, J., & Trowbridge, L. (2008). Teaching secondary school science: Strategies for developing scientific literacy. Columbus: Pearson/Merrill/Prentice Hall.
- Wang, L., Zhang, R., Clarke, D., & Wang, W. (2014). Enactment of scientific inquiry: Observation of two cases at different grade levels in China Mainland. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23 (2), 280-297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-013-9486-0
- Lunetta, V., Hofstein, A., & Clough, M. (2007). Learning and teaching in the school science laboratory: An analysis of research, theory, and practice. Handbook of Research on Science Education, 2.
- So, W. W. M., Zhan, Y., Chow, S. C. F., & Leung, C. F. (2017). Analysis of STEM activities in primary students' science projects in an informal learning environment. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1-12
- Chin, C., & Brown, D. (2002). Student-generated questions: A meaningful aspect of learning in science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(5), 521-549. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110095249
- Schwab, J. (1966). The teaching of science as inquiry. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- 김영민.서혜애.박종석 (2013). 잘 알려진 창의적 과학자들의 과학적 문제 발견 패턴 분석. 한국과학교육학회지, 33(7), 1285-1299. https://doi.org/10.14697/jkase.2013.33.7.1285
- Hoover, S. & Feldhusen, J. (1990). The scientific hypothesis formulation th-grade students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(4), 838-848. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.4.838
- 전윤식.김정섭.윤경미 (2003). 창의성 교육의 새로운 접근 : 문제 찾기. 교육학연구, 41(3), 215-238.
- 조희형.김희경.윤희숙.이기영 (2009). 과학 교육의 이론과 실제. 서울: 교육과학사.
- 조현국 (2018). 2015 개정 교육과정에서 나타나는 과학적 탐구 요소 분석 : 과학탐구실험을 중심으로. 교과교육학연구, 22(3), 208-218. https://doi.org/10.24231/RICI.2018.22.3.208
- 한효순.최병순.강순민.박종윤 (2002). '생각하는 과학'프로그램의 변인활동이 초등학생의 변인통제 능력에 미치는 효과. 한국과학교육학회지, 22(3), 571-585.
- Dewey, J. (1938). Democracy and education. New York: Macmillan.
- Nam, Y., Lee, S. J., & Paik, S. H. (2016). The impact of engineering integrated science (EIS) curricula on first-year technical high school students' attitudes toward science and perceptions of engineering. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 12 (7), 1881-1907.
- NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. National Academies Press.
- Hjalmarson, M., & Lesh, R. (2008). Engineering and design research: Intersections for education research and design. In Handbook of design research methods in education: Innovations in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics learning and teaching. (pp. 114-128). Routledge.
- 문대영 (2008). STEM 통합 접근의 사전 공학 교육 프로그램 모형 개발. 공학교육연구, 11(2), 90-101. https://doi.org/10.18108/JEER.2008.11.2.90
- 이영준.백성혜.신재홍.유헌창.정인기.안상진.최정원.전성균 (2014). 초중등 단계 Computational Thinking 도입을 위한 기초 연구[BD14060010]. 한국과학창의재단.
- Moore, T. J., Glancy, A. W., Tank, K. M., Kersten, J. A., Smith, K. A., Stohlmann. M. S. (2014). A framework for quality K-12 engineering education: Research and development. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, (J-PEER), 4 (1), 1-13.
- 교육부 (2015b). 수학과 교육과정. 교육부 고시 제2015-74호 [별책 8]. 서울 : 교육부.
- 김성준 (2002). 학교 대수 도입과 관련된 논의. 학교수학, 4(1), 29-47
- Polya, G. (1971). How to solve it: a new aspect of mathematical method (2nd ed.). Princeton, N.J. : Princeton University Press, c1957.
- Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical problem solving. New York: Academic Press
- Burton, D. (1985). The History of mathematics : An introduction. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
- Mayer, R. E. (1999). Multimedia aids to problem-solving transfer. International Journal of Educational Research, 31 (7), 611-623. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00027-0
- Partnership for 21st Century Skills(P21). (2009). P21 framework definitions. Retrieved December 1, 2014, from http://www.p21.org
- ATC21S (2012). Defining twenty-first century skills. Retrieved December 1, 2014, from http://www.atc21s.org
- ISTE & CSTA (2011). Operational definition of computational thinking for K-12 education.
- Burgett, T., Folk, R., Fulton, J., Peel, A., Pontelli, E., & Szczepanski, V. (2015). DISSECT: Analysis of pedagogical techniques to integrate computational thinking into K-12 curricula. In Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 2015. 32614 2015. IEEE (pp. 1-9). IEEE.
- Henderson, P. B. (2009) Ubiquitous computational thinking, Computer, (2009 October), 100-102.
- 유중현.김종혜 (2008). 문제 해결과정에서의 정보과학적 사고 능력에 대한 개념적 고찰. 정보창의교육논문지, 2(2), 15-24.
- 박성빈.안성진 (2016). 컴퓨팅 사고력의 역량 탐색 연구 : 소프트웨어개발자를 중심으로. 컴퓨터교육학회논문지, 19(5), 41-53. https://doi.org/10.32431/KACE.2016.19.5.004
- Barr, V., & Stephenson, C. (2011). Bringing computational thinking to K-12: what is Involved and what is the role of the computer science education community?. Acm Inroads, 2 (1), 48-54. https://doi.org/10.1145/1929887.1929905
- Bundy, A. (2007). Computational thinking is pervasive. Journal of Scientific and Practical Computing, 1 (2), 67-69.
- Selby, C., Dorling, M., & Woollard, J. (2014). Evidence of assessing computational thinking. Brookes e Journal of Learning and Teaching, 1-12.
- Deek, F. P., Hiltz, S. R., Kimmel, H. & Router, N. (1999). Cognitive Assessment of Students' Problem Solving and Program Development Skills. Journal of Engineering Education, 88 (3), 317-326. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.1999.tb00453.x
- Guilford, J. P. (1967). Creativity: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 1 (1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1967.tb00002.x
- Heller, K. A. (2007). Scientific ability and creativity. High Ability Studies, 18 (2), 209-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598130701709541
- 박종원 (2004). 과학적 창의성 모델의 제안 : 인지적 측면을 중심으로. 한국과학교육학회지, 24(2), 375-386.
- Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24 (1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.649235
- Sternberg R.J., & Lubart, T. (1993). Creative giftedness: A multivariante investment ap-proach. Gifted Child Quarterly, 37 (1), 7-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/001698629303700102
- 하주현 (2003). 문제발견, 창의적 사고, 창의적 인성의 관계. 교육심리연구, 17(3), 99-115.
- 김영채 (1997). 창의적 문제 해결 : 창의력의 이론, 개발과 수업. 서울: 교육과학사
- Carson, D. K., & Runco, M. A. (1999). Creative problem solving and problem finding in young adults: Interconnections with stress, hassles, and coping abilities. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 33 (3), 167-188. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1999.tb01195.x
- 박미진 (2016). 과학개념 융합을 통한 문제발견 및 문제해결 과정에서 나타나는 과학영재의 창의적 사고의 특성. 박사학위논문, 부산대학교.
- Harms, H. R., & Janosz, D. A. (2012). Pre-engineering. McGraw Hill Education.
- 황혜정.나귀수.최승현.박경미.임재훈.서동엽 (2016). 수학교육학신론. 서울: 문음사.
- NCTM(1991). Mathematical modeling in the secondary school curriculum, In Frank Swetz and J. S. Hartzler(Eds.). Reston, VA: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
- 한병래 (2013). 초등정보교육에서의 계산적사고 교육을 위한 언플러그드 컴퓨팅 방법에 관한 고찰. 정보교육학회논문지, 17(2), 147-156.
- 이동영.남윤경 (2018) 공학설계 측면에서 한국 STEAM 프로그램 분석틀 제안. 대한지구과학교육학회지, 11(1), 63-77. https://doi.org/10.15523/JKSESE.2018.11.1.63
- Rodriguez, B., Rader, C. & Camp, T. (2016). Using student performance to assess CS unplugged activities in a classroom environment. In proceedings of the 2016 ACM conference on innovation and technology in computer science education (pp. 95-100). ACM.
- Taub, R., Armoni, M. and Ben-Ari, M., (2012). CS unplugged and middle-school students' views, attitudes, and intentions regarding CS. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 12(2), No 8.
Cited by
- 융합적 문제해결력 검사 도구 vol.41, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.5467/jkess.2020.41.6.670