디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제17권8호
  • /
  • Pages.27-35
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

국제 난민레짐의 제도변화에 관한 연구

A Study on Institutional Change of International Refugee Regime

  • 투고 : 2019.05.13
  • 심사 : 2019.08.20
  • 발행 : 2019.08.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 국제난민의 문제를 해결하기 위한 국제기구로서 국제난민레짐이 어떠한 역사적 변천과정을 거쳐 결정되었고, 각 국가의 난민레짐은 어떻게 운영되고 있는 지를 검토해 보고자 하였다. 연구방법은 주로 문헌연구를 통해 조사 하였고, 대륙간 국가간 비교, 역사적 연구가 병행 되었다. 영국, 독일 등 유럽 국가들은 국제난민레짐 형성을 주도하고 국제난민을 수용하는데 적극적 역할과 긍정적 인식을 가지고 있는 반면 일본과 한국 등 아시아 국가들은 상당한 폐쇄적 난민레짐과 의식을 가지고 있는 것으로 분석되었다. 즉, 유럽과 아시아의 난민에 대한 세계시민성 의식의 차이를 유추할 수 있다. 이 분석은 각국의 인도주의적 난민정책을 수립하는데 기초 자료가 될 것이다 그리고 현재 분산적으로 시행되는 각 국의 난민 레짐으로 부터 하나의 일반적인 국제 난민 레짐과 제도를 확립하는데 기여할 것이다. 앞으로 본 논문은 각국의 세계난민 정책을 모두 포괄할 수 있는 국제난민 레짐을 수립하고 세계시민성의 난민 포용정책으로 새로운 패러다임을 설정하는데 기여할 수 있다. 따라서 본 여구에서는 이러한 연구를 통해 향후 국제난민정책과 제도의 변동과 법률 및 규정의 합리적인 제정을 유도하게 된다.

This study is analysed about institutional change of international refugee regime with advent of supernational periods in 21 century. Especially the contents was focused on how the EU countries managed their refugee people and system compared to the Asian counterparts. In the international society, especially EU, the British and German preside the refugee policy and laws very positively so as to enter easily from other countries, however, the Asian countries do not as well like the European countries. In terms of this result, that is based on largely their basic comsiouness and values and norm of world citizenships. This research will be conduceived to erect the new international refugee regime which is related to world citizenships. And this will more help to perform a general international regime than in the past. To conclusion, the research was showed a new refugee paradigm forward between many countries as well.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Little.A. & Nick Vaughan-Williams(2017), Stopping boats, Saving lives, Securing subjects : Humanitarian borders in Europe And Australia, European Journal of International Relations, 23(3). 535-538.
  2. EU Commission(2015), Managing migration better in all respects : A European agenda on migration, 13.May.
  3. Loescher G., A.Betts & J.Milner(2008), The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees(UNHCR): The Politics and Practice of Refugee Protection into the twenty-first century, N.Y.: Routledge. 15-49.
  4. Krasner D.(1983) Structural causes and Regime consequences : Regimes as Intervening Variables, S. D. Krasner, ed., International Regimes, Ithaca: Cornell Univ.Press. 1-2.
  5. Ruggie J.(1975) Internal Responses to Techonology: Concepts and Trends, International Organizations, Summer,570-583.
  6. O.Young(1983) Regimes Dynamics : The Rise and Fall of International Regimes,S.D.Krasner,ed.,International Regimes, Ithaca: Cornell Univ. Press. 93-95.
  7. Haggard S.D..and B.Simmons(1987) Thrioes of International Regiems, International Organization, 41(1).510-517.
  8. Keohane R. (1984) After Hegemony : cooperation and discord in the world political economy, Princeton: Princeton Univ. Press.107.
  9. Ernst B.Hass(1982) words can hurt you : or,who said what to whom about regimes, International Organization,36. 210-224
  10. B. C. Park, I S. Suk(2016) Refugee problems in EU crisis, 21st century, Political Science Review,. 26(3). 155-167.
  11. H. J. Kim & Bo K. Moon (2016) Refugee on the Social Security, 21st Century Political Science Review,.26(3), 129-138.
  12. J. W. Suh (2018) A Study on the Indochina Refugee Policy of Asian Countries, The Korean Journal of International Studies, 21(1).163-165.
  13. C. M. Kim(2016) Mid-Estern European Perspectives andStrage on EU Refugee Crisis, Journal of EU Studies, 43, 45-67.
  14. S. H. Lee (2011) Social Exclusion of European Union and its Overcome, The Korean Journal of International Studies.. 14(1).57-58.
  15. W. Walters(2011) Faucault and Frontiers :Notes on the birth of the humanitarian border:Brockling U.& Krassman T. Lemke T. (eds,),Governmentality,London and New York, NY :Routledge, 138-164.
  16. Williams J.(2015) From humanitarianism exeptionalism to contingent care:care and enforcement at the humanitarian border, Political Geography. 47.
  17. Tichtin M.(2011) Casualities of care:Immigration on the Politics of Humanitarianism in France. Berkerly, CA and London: Univ. of California.
  18. Getmansky A., T.Sinmazdemir & T. Zeitzoff (2018), Refugees, enophobia, and domestic conflict : Evidence from a survey experiment in Turkey, Journal of Peace Research, 55(4). 43-67.
  19. Bruter M.(2004), On what citizens mean by feeling 'European': perceptions of news, symbols, and borderless-ness, Journal of Ethinic and Migration Studies. 30(1). 21-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183032000170150
  20. Popa S. A. & D. Dumitrescu (2017), National but European? Visual manifestations of Europe in national parties' Euromanifestos since 1979, Party Politics, 23(5).145-156.
  21. Solingen E.(2001), Mapping Internationalization: Domestic and Regional Impacts, International Studies Quarterly, 36(2). 55-59.
  22. eld.D(1991), Democracy, The Nation-State and the Global System, Economy and Society, 20(2)
  23. Chryssochoou D.N.(2000), Integration Theory and Treaty Reform: A Consociationalist Approach; University of Exeter, Strategies of Inclusion in Pan-European Civil Society, Working Papers 4.
  24. Davis S. & Orchard P.(2015), World Australia's asylum-seeker policy stop boats to Europe?, The conversation, 24, April. http://theconversation.com/world-australias-asylum-seeker-policy-stop-boats-to-europe(accessed/10 Feb.2019).
  25. Neumayer E.(2005), Asylum Recognition Rates in Western Europe, Their Determination Variation and Lack of Convergence, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49(1). 43-66 https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002704271057
  26. Scheve K. F. & M.J. Slaugater (2001), Labor market competition and individual preferences over immigration policy, Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(1).133-145. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465301750160108
  27. Nexon D.H. & I.B. Neumann(2018), Hegemonic order theory: A field- theoretic account, European Journal of Internationl Relations, 24(3). 663-667.
  28. O. J. Shim, E. H. Jang & K. S. Nho (2019).The Effect of Transformationnal Leadership's Sub-Factors on Innovative Behavoir, Journal of Convergence for Information Technology, 9(5),104-105. https://doi.org/10.22156/CS4SMB.2019.9.5.104
  29. Keely C. B.(1996), How Nation-States Create and Respond to Refugee Flows, International Migration Review, 30(4). 303-314.. https://doi.org/10.1177/019791839603000408
  30. Thielemann E. (2003), Between Interests and Norms: Explaining Burden-Sharing in the EU, Journal of Refugee Studies, 16(3).. 253-273. https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/16.3.253
  31. Little A. & Nick Vaughan- Williams(2017), Stopping boats, saving lives, securing subjects: Humanitarin borders in Europe and Austria, European Journal of International Relations, 23(3). 544-545.
  32. G. B. Kim & H. J. Cho (2017), A Study on the Regulation Improvement Measures for Activation of IOT and Big Data Convergence. Journal of Korea Convergence Society, 8(5), 29-30. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2017.8.5.029