DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Method for Converting the Unit Database from Training-model into Analysis-model : Focused on the 'Chang-Jo21' and 'Vision21' model

훈련용 워게임 모델의 부대 DB를 분석용 워게임 모델에 재사용하기 위한 변환방법 연구 : 창조21모델과 비전21모델을 중심으로

  • Lee, Yong-Bok (Training and Doctrine Command, ROKA) ;
  • Park, Min-Hyoung (Republic of Korea Army Training and Doctrine Command Analysis Center) ;
  • Kim, Yeek-Hyun (Republic of Korea Army Training and Doctrine Command Analysis Center)
  • Received : 2019.01.31
  • Accepted : 2019.06.28
  • Published : 2019.06.30

Abstract

In the field of defense M&S, we are actively pursuing researches that interoperable multiple war game models to simulate various combat environments at the same time. Although the 'unit DB(Database)' for operating the war game models is originated from the identical data, it has been recognized that the method of expressing the attribute of the data is different and the cross reference is impossible. As a result, it makes unnecessary time and effort in establishing the same unit DB in the organizations that operate the war game model. In this study, a method of reusing the unit DB of the training war game model to the analysis war game model with similar resolution and simulated logic was applied to the actual field. For this purpose, we defined the procedure for converting the unit DB by analyzing metadata of the 'Chang-Jo21', a combat training model for corps and division, and the 'Vision21', an analysis model for corps and division operation plan. And we introduced an algorithm that can map different metadata of two unit DBs. This study was meaningful as the first attempt to map and integrate heterogeneous metadata semantically for the reuse of unit DB between different war game models in defense M&S field. Also, it provided implications for the necessity of paradigm shift that reuse of the unit DB between two different war game models is possible and the need for standardization of the unit DB metadata in the defense M&S filed.

국방 M&S(Modeling&Simulation) 분야에서는 다양한 전투 환경을 동시에 모의하기 위해 다수의 워게임 모델을 연동하는 연구를 활발하게 추진하여 성과를 달성하고 있으나, 워게임 모델을 운용하기 위한 부대 DB(DataBase)는 동일한 자료임에도 불구하고 데이터의 속성(메타데이터)에 대한 표현 방법이 달라서 상호참조가 불가능한 것으로 인식되어 왔다. 이로 인해 워게임 모델을 운용하는 기관에서 같은 부대 DB를 각각 구축하기 위한 시간과 노력의 중복이 발생하고 있다. 본 연구에서는 해상도와 모의 논리는 유사하지만 도메인이 다른 훈련용 워게임 모델의 부대 DB를 분석용 워게임 모델에서 재사용하는 방법을 연구하여 실제 분야에 적용했다. 이를 위해 군단 및 사단 전투지휘훈련용 모델인 '창조21 모델'과 군단 및 사단 작전계획 모의분석용 모델인 '비전21 모델'의 부대 DB 메타데이터를 분석하여 부대 DB를 전환하는 절차를 정의하고, 부대 DB의 서로 다른 메타데이터를 매핑하는 알고리즘을 제안하였다. 본 연구는 국방 M&S 분야에서 워게임 모델 간 부대 DB의 재사용을 위해 이질적인 메타데이터를 의미상으로 통합하여 매핑을 시도한 최초 사례로서 의의가 있다. 또한, 국방 M&S 분야에서 워게임 모델 간 부대 DB의 재사용이 가능하다는 패러다임 전환과, 부대 DB 메타데이터의 표준화 필요성에 대한 시사점을 제공하였다.

Keywords

SMROBX_2019_v28n2_159_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Operation procedure of war game model

SMROBX_2019_v28n2_159_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. Automatic quantity calculation logic

SMROBX_2019_v28n2_159_f0003.png 이미지

Fig. 3. Resolution difference

SMROBX_2019_v28n2_159_f0004.png 이미지

Fig. 4. Create unit DB file

Table 1. Concept Comparison by purpose of war game model

SMROBX_2019_v28n2_159_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Types of equipment and supplies of each model

SMROBX_2019_v28n2_159_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Representation of metadata and data property

SMROBX_2019_v28n2_159_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Procedure of unitDB reuse

SMROBX_2019_v28n2_159_t0004.png 이미지

Table 5. Index mapping for equipment

SMROBX_2019_v28n2_159_t0005.png 이미지

Table 6. Mapping for unit name

SMROBX_2019_v28n2_159_t0006.png 이미지

Table 7. Implementation of unit DB linkage algorithm

SMROBX_2019_v28n2_159_t0007.png 이미지

Table 8. Comparison of two unit DB establishment methods

SMROBX_2019_v28n2_159_t0008.png 이미지

References

  1. Cheon Y.H., et al. (2016) Defnese Modeling and Simulation, goldenpinebooks, pp. 242-250.
  2. Cho S.S., et al. (2017) Modeling & Simulation, cmgbook, pp. 12-15.
  3. Choi K.P., et al. (2010) A Study on the Development of the Education Content Metadata Database for the Construction of the Military Tele-education System, KIDA, p. 59.
  4. Choi S.Y. (2011) Introduction to Defense Modeling and Simulation, bookorea, pp. 8-25.
  5. Lee M.H. (2005) Establishment of Defense M&S Standard Data System, The Quarterly Journal of Defense Policy Studies, vol. 68, pp. 37-65.
  6. Jung S.Y., et al. (2015) Standardization Methodology and Application of Defense M&S System, KIDA, pp. 37-43.
  7. Kim I.K., et al. (2018) A Study on the Application of the Corps-level Operation Plan Simulation by Constructive Models and Lessons in Relating to the Field Forces, 20th Defense M&S Development Seminar, pp. 119-120.
  8. Lee Y.B. (2017) A Study on the Development of Analysis Model from the User's Point of view for Customer Satisfaction, 2017 Weapon System M&S Workshop, pp. 1-26.
  9. Moon H.S., et al. (2011) The Study on Consistency of Simulation Logic about Close Combat Damage Assessment among Constructive Models : Based on Combined Arms Integrated Interoperability System, Journal of the Military Operations Research Society of Korea, vol. 37, no. 1, p. 88.
  10. Son E.Ch. (2017) Direction of Development for the Defense Training M&S according to the Fourth Industrial Revolution, 19th Defense M&S Development Seminar, p. 94.