DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Proposal of Localization Policy Based on the Status of Chinese's Research Facilities and Equipment Construction in Korean Basic and Analytical Science Field

국내 기초·분석과학 분야 내 중국산 연구시설·장비 구축 현황에 따른 국산화 정책 제언

  • Kim, Chang-Yong (Scientific Instruments Reliability Assessment Center, Korea Basic Science Institute) ;
  • Chung, Taewon (Division of Policy, Korea Basic Science Institute) ;
  • Kong, Jaehyun (Scientific Instruments Reliability Assessment Center, Korea Basic Science Institute) ;
  • Park, Chan-Soo (Scientific Instruments Reliability Assessment Center, Korea Basic Science Institute)
  • 김창용 (한국기초과학지원연구원 국산장비신뢰성평가센터) ;
  • 정태원 (한국기초과학지원연구원 정책전략팀) ;
  • 공재현 (한국기초과학지원연구원 국산장비신뢰성평가센터) ;
  • 박찬수 (한국기초과학지원연구원 국산장비신뢰성평가센터)
  • Received : 2019.04.02
  • Accepted : 2019.06.07
  • Published : 2019.06.30

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the scale and market share of Chinese's research facility & equipment in the domestic research equipment market of basic and analytical science field for analyzing the difference of the number and amount of construction by year of acquisition, national research facility equipment standard classification code, and type of institution based on the information of the research equipment invested by the Korean government for the past 14 years. In addition, we analyzed the correlation among the year of acquisition, equipment standard classification code, and type of institution variables. As of January 1 2019, from 2005 to 2018, 50 Chinese's research facilities & equipments (main equipment with a construction cost of 30 million won or more) built in the basic and analytical science fields were selected for this study and their number of construction, amount of construction, year of acquisition, type of institution, and standard classification code were analyzed. Differences of the number and amount of construction with-in and by year of acquisition, standard classification code, and type of institution were tested using a single sample Chi-square test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Kruskal-wallis test. The correlation among the three variables was analyzed by using the Chi-square test of cross-tabulation analysis. And there was a statistically significant correlation among the year of acquisition, standard classification code, and type of institution (p<.05). Compared to the 2000s, in the 2010s, high-priced Optical Electronics/Video Equipment was installed at private universities, private enterprises, and government-affiliated research institute. Therefore, the domestic construction status of Chinese's research facility & equipment in the basic science and analytical science field is less than that of the domestic ones, but the number and the amount of construction are increasing statistically. So it is necessary for the government to be able to recognize the possibility that the Chinese's research facility and equipment can encroach on the domestic research industry market and to prepare related provision.

본 연구의 목적은 과거 14년간 한국 정부가 투자한 연구시설 장비의 구축정보를 기반으로 기초 분석과학 분야에서 중국산 연구시설 장비가 국내연구장비 시장에서 차지하는 규모와 시장점유의 수준을 알아보기 위해 구축년도 장비표준분류 보유기관 유형별로 구축 수와 구축금액 차이를 비교 분석하였다. 또한 구축년도 장비표준분류 보유기관 유형 변수들 간에 상관성 유무도 분석하였다. 2019년 1월 1일을 기준으로 2005년부터 2018년까지 국내에 구축된 중국산 연구시설 장비를 대상으로 기초 분석과학 분야에 활용되는 연구시설 장비(구축금액이 3천만원 이상인 주장비 기준) 50점의 구축 수, 구축금액, 구축년도, 연구장비 보유기관, 그리고 장비표준분류를 분석 항목에 포함하였다. 구축년도 장비표준분류 보유기관 유형 내 중국산 연구시설 장비 구축 수 차이를 비교하기 위하여 단일표본 카이제곱검정 방법을, 구축년도 장비표준분류 보유기관 유형별 중국산 연구시설 장비 구축금액 차이를 비교하기 위하여 각각 맨-휘트니 U 검정과 크러스칼-왈리스 검정을 사용하였으며 구축년도 장비표준분류 보유기관 유형 간 상관성 유무는 교차분석을 통한 카이제곱검정을 이용하였다. 본 연구결과, 중국산 연구장비의 국내 구축 수와 금액은 구축년도 장비표준분류 보유기관 유형별로 통계학적으로 유의하게 증가(p<.05).하는 추세이며 2000년대에 비해 2010년대에 고가의 광학전자/영상장비가 사립대학 및 민간기업과 정부출연연구소에 구축되었다. 따라서 기초 분석과학 분야 내 중국산 연구시설 장비의 국내 구축현황은 국산보다는 그 수준이 아직 미비하지만 구축 수와 금액이 통계학적으로 유의하게 증가 추세이므로 중국산 연구시설 장비가 국내 연구산업시장을 잠식할 수 있다는 가능성을 인지함과 동시에 관련 대비책 마련이 정부 주도로 필요할 것이다.

Keywords

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n6_460_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Selection process of analyzed Chinese’s Research Facilities & Equipment built in Korea

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n6_460_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. The trends of number of construction and amount of construction in Chinese’s research facility equipment by construction year in Korea (R2 is the slope value of the linear regression line).

Table 1. The analyzed target group* in the national research facility equipment standard classification system

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n6_460_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Construction status of Chinese’s research equipment according to the year of acquisition, national research facility equipment standard classification code, and type of institution in Korea

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n6_460_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Comparison of the amount built in Chinese’s research equipment according to the year of acquisition, national research facility equipment standard classification code, and type of institution in Korea

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n6_460_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Correlation among the year of acquisition, national research facility equipment standard classification code, and type of institution

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n6_460_t0004.png 이미지

References

  1. IMF World Economic Outlook. "Spillovers from China's Transition and from Migration", April 2018, Available From: http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/weo/2016/04/index.htm
  2. H. Wang, Study on the system and policy changes of China's secience and technology, Master's thesis, Kangwon National University of Public Administration, Kangwon, Korea, pp.11-21, 2016.
  3. Science and Technology Policy Trends. "China, Basic Research Investment Status and Problem Analysis", May 6 2018, Available From: http://www.ndsl.kr/ndsl/search/detail/trend/trend SearchResultDetail.do?cn=GT200801075.
  4. China Institute of Science and Technology Information. "China 'official scientific research equipment innovation demonstration project' official operation", April 4 2008, Available From: http://www.chinainfo.gov.cn/data/200803/1_20080331_164098.html
  5. Ministry of Science and ICT and 19 ministries. "The 4th Basic Research Promotion Comprehensive Plan('18-'22)", June 29 2018.
  6. Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning. "Plan for investment efficiency and joint utilization of national research facility equipment (plan)", Oct 30 2015.
  7. Ministry of Science and ICT and 16 ministries. "Plan for the operation and utilization of national research facilities and equipment (plan) (2018-2022)", January 19 2018.
  8. Ministry of Science and ICT. "Research Industry Innovation Growth Strategy (Plan)", Nov 20 2017.
  9. S. I. Jeong. "Domestic Research Equipment Industry Analysis and Competitive Strategy", Proceedings of the Korea Technology Innovation Society Conference 2017, Korea Technology Innovation Society, Jeju, Korea, pp.311-328, Nov 2017.
  10. J. S. Han, Study on the National Innovation System and Innovative Capacity of China in the Reform Era, Doctor's thesis, Chung-Ang University of Graduate School: Chinese Area Studies Chinese Political Economy, Seoul, Korea, pp.43-105, 2006.
  11. TechNavio. "Global Laboratory Analytical Instruments and Consumables Market 2018-2022", pp.2-131, Feb 2018, Available From: https://www.technavio.com
  12. BCC Research. "Analytical Laboratory Instruments Manufacturing: Global Market to 2022", pp.37-49, July 2018.
  13. Y. M. Kwon, Status of Scientific Researchers in Japan and China and Policy for securing new workforce, Korea Institute of Science and Technology of Center for Convergence Research Policy, Fusion Focus Vol. 136 Nov 5 2018.
  14. OECD. Main Science and Technology Indacators. Volume 2018 Issue 1, OECD Publishing, Paris. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1787/msti-v2018-1-en
  15. Korea-China Sceince & Technology Cooperation Center. "Trends and Implications of Basic Research Support in China", July 10 2017.
  16. S. H. Kim, "Introduction of Center for Supporting Korea Medical Devices", Korea International Medical & Hospital Equipment Show 2019, Seminar on advancement into Chinese medical device market, Seoul, Korea, pp.32-34, March 2019.