DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Development of Performance Indicator for the Educational Welfare Priority Support Project

교육복지우선지원사업 성과지표 개발에 관한 연구

  • Kim, Soo Jung (Institute for Korean Education Research, Hanyang University) ;
  • Song, Mi Ryoung (Institute for Korean Education Research, Hanyang University)
  • 김수정 (한양대학교 한국교육문제연구소) ;
  • 송미령 (한양대학교 한국교육문제연구소)
  • Received : 2019.03.12
  • Accepted : 2019.06.07
  • Published : 2019.06.30

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to extend the research on the development of the performance indicators for the Education Welfare Priority Support Project and to secure the content validity for the application to the school site. The performance index of the Education Welfare Priority Support Project used in this study was originally consisted of 6 area, 33 sub-area, and 233 items. Two expert meetings were held for five doctoral professionals in the field of educational welfare. Delphi surveys were conducted for a group of 99 educational welfare workers who worked at the site for more than five years. The item selection criteria ($CVR{\geq}.29$, $CVI{\geq}.80$, convergence <.50, agreement ${\geq}.05$, stability ${\leq}.80$, $M{\geq}3.00$, SD <.80, reliability ${\geq}.6$) were applied. The 6 area, 23 sub-areas, and 93 items were verified and finally 90 items were selected from removing 3 items with low level of reliability. Providing suggestions and follow-up studies for the better use of the performance indicators for the Education Welfare Priority Support Project in the field.

본 연구의 목적은 교육복지우선지원사업 성과지표 개발 연구의 연장선으로, 학교 현장에의 적용을 위해 내용타당도를 확보하는 것이다. 본 연구에 사용된 교육복지우선지원사업 성과지표(안)은 6개 대영역, 33개 하위영역, 233개 문항으로 구성되었다. 교육복지 분야 박사급 전문가 5인을 대상으로 2회의 전문가 회의를 실시하였고, 현장에서 5년 이상 근무한 교육복지사 99명을 대상으로 델파이조사를 실시하였다. 문항 선정 기준($CVR{\geq}.29$, $CVI{\geq}.80$, 수렴도<.50, 합의도${\geq}.05$, 안정도${\leq}.80$, $M{\geq}3.00$, SD<.80, 신뢰도${\geq}.6$)을 적용하여, 6개 대영역, 23개 하위영역, 93개 문항에 대해 타당성을 확보하였고, 이 중 신뢰도가 낮은 3문항을 제외하여 최종 90문항으로 확정하였다. 교육복지우선지원사업 성과지표가 현장에서 보다 유용하게 활용되기 위한 제언과 후속 연구를 제시하였다.

Keywords

Table 1. Preliminary Research on Performance Indicator Area of the Education Welfare Priority Support Project

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n6_188_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Performance Indicator Area of the Education Welfare Priority Support Project

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n6_188_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Expert Meeting Results

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n6_188_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Statistics of Field Practitioner Expert Group

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n6_188_t0004.png 이미지

Table 5. Field Practitioner Expert Content Validity Results

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n6_188_t0005.png 이미지

Table 6. Final Performance Index of the Education Welfare Priority Support Project

SHGSCZ_2019_v20n6_188_t0006.png 이미지

References

  1. K. H. Kim, H. S. Kim, J. I. Lee, Study on development of performance index of priority support for education welfare, Central Education Welfare Research Support Center, Korea, pp.97-105.
  2. H. S. Kim, A comprehensive study on the new direction of human capital policy-Intergenerational tier mobility and the role of education, Korea Development Institute, Korea, pp. 636-665.
  3. S. S. Kim, "Differences in opportunities for college admission according to the background of students: focusing on gender, family background and local influence", Asian Education Research, 9, 2, pp.27-47, 2008. https://doi.org/10.15753/aje.2008.9.2.002
  4. B. R. Ruy, K. E, Kim, E. M. Lee, I. H. Kim, K. H. Lee, A study on the institutionalization plan of the project to support the priority investment for education welfare, Korean Educational Development Institute, Korea, pp. 19-29.
  5. J. H. Song, Y. M. Jung, S. J. Kim, H. J. Lim, T. H. Noh, S. G. Lee, Central Education Welfare Research Support Center, Korea, pp. 16-20.
  6. H. R. Kim, S. H. Choi, S.W. Cho, "A Study on the Development of Performance Welfare Priority Support Project Performance Scale", School social welfare, 21, pp.1-29, 2011.
  7. G. Y. Lee, M. H. Park, S. W. Kwon, D. M. Seo, Gyeonggi provincial education welfare priority support project performance analysis, Gyeonggi Provincial Education Research Institute, Korea, pp.41-90.
  8. K. H. Kim, "Effects analyses of education welfare investment priority zone plan", Journal of Educational Research, 32, 1, pp.1-25, 2011. DOI : 10.18612/cnujes.2011.32.1.1
  9. B. B. Baek, J. S. Kim, B. S. Yu, "Effects of the Education Welfare Priority Project on the cognitive and affective achievements of the concentrated supported students: Focused on elementary school students of Seoul", Education Problem Research, 48, pp. 29-52, 2013.
  10. B. R. Youn, H. J. Lim, X. N. Jin, "School effects of education welfare priority project on cognitive achievements of elementary school students", Korean Journal of Sociology of Education, 24, 4, pp.125-150, 2014. DOI : 10.32465/ksocio.2014.24.4.005
  11. B. J. Lee, H. J. Moon, J. E. Kim, "The effect of the supportive project for the priority region of educational welfare investment(SPPREWI) on children's School Achievement", Journal of the Korean society of child welfare, 3, pp.161-190, 2014.
  12. Y. J. Jung, M. Y. Um, "Effect of the spportive project for the priority region of educational welfare investment[SPPREWI] on school children's psychosocial and cognitive adjustment", Korean Journal of Social Welfare, 61, 4, pp.5-33, 2009. DOI: 10.20970/kasw.2009.61.4.001
  13. M. R. Lynn, "Determination and quantification of content validity", Nursing Research, 35(6), pp.382-386, 1986. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017
  14. N. Y. An, Assistive technology assessment tool development and examination, Ph.D dissertation, Korea Nazarene University, pp.36.
  15. C. H. Lawshe, "A quantitative approach to content validity", Personnel Psychology, 28, pp.563-575. 1975. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
  16. M. O. Song, K. S. Jang, "The validity and reliability of safety competency tool for perioperative nurses", Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial cooperation Society, 17(10), pp. 345-356, 2016. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5762/KAIS.2016.17.10.345
  17. Y. H. Noh, "Research on development of social value evaluation indicators for public libraries", Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 34(2), pp.181-217, 2017. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2017.34.2.181
  18. A. Y. Song, J. S. Lee, "Developing Evaluation Items for Community Participation of Stroke Patients: Delphi Study", Journal of Korean Society of Occupational Therapy, 24(4), pp.33-44, 2016. https://doi.org/10.14519/jksot.2016.24.4.03
  19. S. M. Cha, A means-end chain approach to identifying foreign consumer value structure for korean restaurants, Ph.D dissertation, Yeonsei University, pp. 51.
  20. A. H. Van de Ven, D. L. Ferry, Measuring and assessing organizations, pp.81, New York: Wiley, 1980.
  21. C. A. Rapp, J. Poertner, "Moving clients center stage through the use of client outcomes", Administration in Social Work, 11(3-4), pp. 23-38, 1988. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J147v11n03_03
  22. R. L. Schalock, Outcome-based evaluation, pp.127-158, New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, 2001.
  23. B. J. Lee, "The meaning and role of indicators and indices for child advocacy", The 11th child welfare forum directory, ChildFund Korea, Seoul, Korea, p.20, May 2016.
  24. Laura H. Lippman, Kristin Anderson Moore, Hugh McIntosh, "Positive indicators of child well-being: A conceptual framework, measures, and methodological issues", Applied Research in Quality cf Life, 6(4), pp.425-449, 2011. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11482-011-9138-6
  25. Ministry of Education, "Education welfare priority support project operation direction(Performance Guidelines)", Sejong: Ministy of Education, 2018.
  26. B. R. Ruy, J. Y. Kim, H. J. Song, J. K. Kim, D. H. Kim, A study on the effect of the termination effect on the education welfare priority support project, Korean Educational Development Institute, Korea, pp. 20-22.
  27. B. D. Sohn, C. H. Koo, M. S. Kim, J. M. Kim, "Research on the effectiveness of educational welfare priority support project", Korean journal of youth studies, 25, 12, 389-410, 2018. DOI: 10.21509/KJYS.2018.12.25.12.389
  28. M. Planigale, Literature review: Measurement of client outcomes in homelessness services. HomeGround Services. Australia, pp.34.