한국농공학회논문집 (Journal of The Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers)

  • 제61권4호
  • /
  • Pages.43-54
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 1738-3692(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2093-7709(eISSN)
한국농공학회 (The Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

영월읍 농촌중심지활성화 사업 모니터링 결과 분석 - 2018년 지역역량강화 프로그램을 중심으로 -

The Monitoring and Evaluation of the Community Central Revitalization Project in Yeongwol - Focusing on the Community Empowerment Project in 2018 -

  • Jeong, Meekyung (Department of Social Welfare, Kangwon National University) ;
  • Kim, Kisung (Department of Regional Infrastructure Engineering, Kangwon National University)
  • 투고 : 2019.05.21
  • 심사 : 2019.06.11
  • 발행 : 2019.07.31
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

The present study aims to monitor three of the community empowerment projects implemented as part of the community central revitalization projects in Yeongwol. We used an established indicator (i.e., quantitative evaluation) as well as an interview (i.e., qualitative evaluation) throughout the monitoring process. The PM (project manager) committee members, consisting of six interdisciplinary experts, carried out the monitoring from $24^{th}$ of October until the $26^{th}$ of November 2018. We categorized the results of the monitoring into the aspects of needs, software, and hardware, and analyzed them as follows: First, although the locals were willing to take part in programs, they were in overall not well informed about the ongoing programs and the program that suits their needs the most. The service organization should therefore actively publicize the program and provide sufficient information about it .Second, instead of a one-off program, the locals should be empowered to take over the program eventually and develop it as a local business model. Last, the locals from the center as well as the outskirts of Yeongwol should organize a learning net, collaboratively develop a further program, and assess its effectiveness by employing a thorough monitoring system.

키워드

Table 1 Program schedules and duration

NGHHCI_2019_v61n4_43_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2 The contents, criteria, and indicators of program monitoring

NGHHCI_2019_v61n4_43_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3 The PM committee members

NGHHCI_2019_v61n4_43_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4 The quantitative evaluation of the program nurturing of design craftsmen

NGHHCI_2019_v61n4_43_t0004.png 이미지

Table 5 The qualitative evaluation of the program-nurturing of design craftsmen

NGHHCI_2019_v61n4_43_t0005.png 이미지

Table 6 The quantitative evaluation of the program-inheriting local old folk songs

NGHHCI_2019_v61n4_43_t0006.png 이미지

Table 7 The qualitative evaluation of the program-inheriting local old folk songs

NGHHCI_2019_v61n4_43_t0007.png 이미지

Table 8 The quantitative evaluation of the program-nurturing of Yeongwol travel guides

NGHHCI_2019_v61n4_43_t0008.png 이미지

Table 9 The quantitative evaluation of the program ‘nurturing of Yeongwol travel guides’

NGHHCI_2019_v61n4_43_t0009.png 이미지

참고문헌

  1. AusAID (The Australian Agency for International Development, AUS), 2011. Guideline: Completing a quality at implementation report. Canberra: AusAID.
  2. Chen, H. T., 2005. Practical Program Evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publication, Inc.
  3. CIDA (Canadian International Development Agency, CAN), 2004. CIDA evaluation guide. Ottawa: Canada Evaluation Division Performance & Knowledge Management Branch.
  4. DFID (Department for International Development, UK), 2011. Monitoring and evaluation framework: Breaking the cycle: Saving lives and protecting the future. London.
  5. Joo, K. P., and D. B. Kwon, 2008. The development of evaluation criteria system to monitor programs at university lifelong education centers. Andragogy Today: International Journal of Adult & Continuing Education 11(1): 27-55.
  6. MAFRA (Ministry of Agriculture, Food and community Affairs), 2018. Revitalization of community development project (in Korean).
  7. MOE.KEDI, 2004. White paper on lifelong education. Seoul: MOE.KEDI.
  8. MOFA (Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan), 2011. Annual report Japan's ODA evaluation 2011. Tokyo: MOFA.
  9. Mohr, L. B., 1995. Impact Analysis for Program Evaluation (2nd Eds.). CA: Sage Publication, Inc.
  10. Oh, H. J., 2000. A study on the learner's evaluative criteria of adult education program. A Thesis for Degree of Doctor of Education in SNU.
  11. Poster. J. J., 2004. Performance Monitoring, In Wholey, I. S., H. P. Hatry., and K. E. Newcomer, (eds). Handbook of Practical Program Evaluation. San Francisco: John Wiley and Sons.
  12. Rossi, P. H., M. W. Lipsey, and H. E. Freeman, 2004. Evaluation: A Systematic Approach (7th ed.), 171-172. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publication, Inc.
  13. Walter, J. D., 1976. Monitoring for government agencies. Washington, D. C.: The Urban Institute.