DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Review of Spiritual Distress Assessment Tools: A Literature Review

영적 고뇌 측정도구에 대한 고찰

  • Received : 2019.06.08
  • Accepted : 2019.07.20
  • Published : 2019.07.28

Abstract

This study was done to evaluate current spiritual distress assessment tools and to assess nursing research adapted this spiritual distress assessment tools. Spiritual distress assessment tools were identified through systematic review. Ten studies about spiritual distress assessment tools were identified. In these studies, three international and one domestic standardized assessment tools were found. The purpose of developing these tools was to provide spiritual care through assessing spiritual distress. Domestic assessment tool had low reliability, was not proved by constructive validity, and did not include multidimensional spiritual concepts. International assessment tools may take into account cultural and religious backgrounds in the context for cultural adaptation of instruments. Based on these results, the development of Korean version of spiritual distress assessment tool is recommended.

본 연구는 영적 고뇌 측정도구의 속성을 평가하기 위해 시도되었다. 2016년 4월1일부터 4월20일까지 국내외학술지에 게재된 논문 중 체계적 문헌고찰을 통해 선정된 논문을 중심으로 분석을 실시하였다. 최종 선정된 문헌은 국내외 논문 10개였으며, 표준화된 영적 고뇌 측정도구는 국내1개, 국외3개 도구가 있었으며, 이를 중심으로 도구의 속성을 평가하였다. 영적 고뇌 측정도구는 당뇨환자, 암환자, 노인환자 등을 대상으로 개발되었고, 영적 고뇌를 사정하여 영적 간호를 제공하기 위한 전인적 접근을 목적으로 하고 있었다. 국내에서 개발된 도구는 신뢰도가 낮았고, 구성 타당도가 입증되지 않았으며 다차원적 영적인 개념을 반영하지 못하고 있었다. 국외에서 개발된 도구는 타문화권 적용시 국내의 문화 종교적 배경을 고려해야 하며 간호사가 활용할 수 있는 도구가 부족하였다. 따라서 이러한 단점을 보완하여 다차원적인 영적 개념을 반영한 도구 개발이 필요하다.

Keywords

OHHGBW_2019_v10n7_383_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Flow for the Selection Studies

Table 1. Comparison of Spiritual Distress Assessment Tools according to General Properties

OHHGBW_2019_v10n7_383_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Comparison of Spiritual Distress Assessment tools according to Reliability and Validity

OHHGBW_2019_v10n7_383_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Nursing Research applied Spiritual Distress Assessment Tools

OHHGBW_2019_v10n7_383_t0003.png 이미지

References

  1. M. E. O' Brien. (2008). 3rd. Spirituality in nursing: Standing on holy ground. Washington, DC: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
  2. P. H. Boston & B. M. Mount. (2006). The Caregiver's Perspective on Existential and Spiritual Distress in Palliative Care. Journal of Pain Symptom Manage, 32(1), 13-26. DOI : 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2006.01.009
  3. S. M. Monod, M. Brennan, E. Rochat, E. Martin, Rochat & C. J. Bula. (2011). Instruments Measuring Spirituality in Clinical Research: a Systematic Review. Journal of Gerento Internal Medicine, 26(11), 1345-1357. DOI : 10.1007/s11606-011-1769-7
  4. S. M. Monod, E. Rochat, C. J. Bula, G. Jobin, E. Martin, & B. Spencer. (2010). The Spiritual Distress Assessment Tool: an Instrument to Assess Spiritual Distress in Hospitalized Elderly Persons. BMC Geriatric, 10, 88. DOI : 10.1186/1471-2318-10-88
  5. I. S. Ko S. Y. Choi & J. S. Kim. (2017). Evolutionary Concept Analysis of Spirituality. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 47(2), 242-256. DOI : 10.4040/jkan.2017.47.2.242
  6. T. H. Herdman & S. Kamitsuru. (2016). Nursing diagnoses definitions and classification, 2015-2017 10th Edition. (I.S. Ko, E. G. Oh, & R. Y. Song, Trans 10th ed.). Seoul: Jungdam Media..
  7. D. Y. Lee, J. K. Park & A. S. Chio. (2016). Convergence Factors of Spirituality Affecting on Spiritual Well-being of Nursing Students. Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 7(5), 59-68. DOI : 10.15207/JKCS.2016.7.5.059
  8. J. H. Blanchard, D. A. Dunlap & G. Fitchett. (2012). Screening for Spiritual Distress in the Oncology Inpatient: a Quality Improvement Pilot Project between Nurses and Chaplains. Journal of Nursing Management, 20(8), 1076-1084. DOI : 10.1111/jonm.12035
  9. E. O. Lee N. Y. Im & H. A. Park. (2009). Nursing research and statistical analysis (4 ed.). Paju: Soomoonsa.
  10. C. F. Waltz, O. L. Strickland & E. R. Lenz. (2010). Measurement in nursing and health research. New York, US: Springer Publishing Company.
  11. D. F. Polit. (2015). Assessing Measurement in Health: Beyond Reliability and Validity. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 52(11), 1746-1753. DOI : 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.07.002
  12. K. O. Kim. (1989). A study on the level of meaning of life and spiritual distress of patients with diabetes mellitus. (MSN Thesis), Graduate School, Korea University, Seoul.
  13. S. Stranahan. (2008). A Spiritual Screening Tool for Older Adults. Journal of Religion Health, 47(4), 491-503. DOI : 10.1007/s10943-007-9156-8
  14. Y. L. Ku, S. M. Kuo & C. Y. Yao. (2010). Establishing the Validity of a Spiritual Distress Scale for Cancer Patients Hospitalized in Southern Taiwan. International Journal of Palliative Nursing, 16(3), 134-138. DOI : 10.12968/ijpn.2010.16.3.47325
  15. S. M. Monod, E. Martin, B. Spencer, E. Rochat & C. Bula. (2012). Validation of the Spiritual Distress Assessment Tool in Older Hospitalized Patients. BMC Geriatric, 12, 13. DOI : 10.1186/1471-2318-12-13
  16. M. A. Bornet et al. (2016). Instruments to Assess Depressive Symptoms and Spiritual Distress Investigate Different Dimensions. Clinical Gerontologist, 39(2), 104-116. DOI : 10.1080/07317115.2015.1120255
  17. M. O. Yun. (2005). The Effect of Spiritual Nursing Intervention on the Meaning of Life and Spiritual Distress of the Terminal Cancer Patients. Korean Journal of Hospice Care, 5(2), 64-74.
  18. G. A. Gang. (1998). A Study on the Relationship between the Meaning of Life and Spiritual Distress in Cancer Patients. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 37(4), 85-95.
  19. J. E. Han & K. A .Kang. (2000). A Study on the Relationship between the Meaning of Life and Spiritual Distress in Arthritis. Korean Society of Muscle and Joint Health, 7(1), 77-88.
  20. T. P. Simao et al.. (2016). Cultural Adaptation and Analysis of the Psychometric Properties of the Brazilian Version of the Spiritual Distress Scale. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 25(1-2), 231-239. DOI : 10.1111/jocn.13060
  21. L. B. Mokkink et al. (2012). COSMIN checklist manual [Internet]. Retrieved April 2, 2016, from http://www.cosmin.nl/images/upload/files/COSMIN%2 0checklist%20manual%20v9.pdf
  22. E. O. Im, R. Page, L. C. Lin, H. M. Tsai & C. Y. Cheng. (2004). Rigor in Cross-cultural Nursing Research. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 41(8), 891-899. DOI : 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2004.04.003