과제정보
The authors are grateful to Insuk Sohn, Ph.D., Biostatics and Clinical Epidemiology Center, Samsung Medical Center, for help in the statistical analyses.
참고문헌
- Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB, Lehrer D, Bohm-Velez M, et al. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA 2008;299:2151-2163 https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.299.18.2151
- Kelly KM, Dean J, Comulada WS, Lee SJ. Breast cancer detection using automated whole breast ultrasound and mammography in radiographically dense breasts. Eur Radiol 2010;20:734-742 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1588-y
- Hooley RJ, Scoutt LM, Philpotts LE. Breast ultrasonography: state of the art. Radiology 2013;268:642-659 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13121606
- Ohuchi N, Suzuki A, Sobue T, Kawai M, Yamamoto S, Zheng YF, et al. Sensitivity and specificity of mammography and adjunctive ultrasonography to screen for breast cancer in the Japan Strategic Anti-cancer Randomized Trial (J-START): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2016;387:341-348 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00774-6
- Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, Mendelson EB. Training the ACRIN 6666 Investigators and effects of feedback on breast ultrasound interpretive performance and agreement in BI-RADS ultrasound feature analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;199:224-235 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.11.7324
- D'Orsi C, Sickles E, Mendelson E, Morris E. ACR BI-RADS® Atlas, breast imaging reporting and data system, 5th ed. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology, 2013:1-153.
- Lazarus E, Mainiero MB, Schepps B, Koelliker SL, Livingston LS. BI-RADS lexicon for US and mammography: interobserver variability and positive predictive value. Radiology 2006;239:385-391 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2392042127
- Kim EK, Ko KH, Oh KK, Kwak JY, You JK, Kim MJ, et al. Clinical application of the BI-RADS final assessment to breast sonography in conjunction with mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;190:1209-1215 https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.07.3259
- Stavros AT, Freitas AG, Giselle G, Barke L, McDonald D, Kaske T, et al. Ultrasound positive predictive values by BI-RADS categories 3-5 for solid masses: an independent reader study. Eur Radiol 2017;27:4307-4315 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-4835-7
- Abdullah N, Mesurolle B, El-Khoury M, Kao E. Breast imaging reporting and data system lexicon for US: interobserver agreement for assessment of breast masses. Radiology 2009;252:665-672 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2523080670
- Yoon JH, Kim MJ, Moon HJ, Kwak JY, Kim EK. Subcategorization of ultrasonographic BI-RADS category 4: positive predictive value and clinical factors affecting it. Ultrasound Med Biol 2011;37:693-699 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2011.02.009
- Doi K. Computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging: historical review, current status and future potential. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2007;31:198-211 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compmedimag.2007.02.002
- Joo S, Yang YS, Moon WK, Kim HC. Computer-aided diagnosis of solid breast nodules: use of an artificial neural network based on multiple sonographic features. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2004;23:1292-1300 https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2004.834617
- Huang YL, Chen DR. Support vector machines in sonography: application to decision making in the diagnosis of breast cancer. Clin Imaging 2005;29:179-184 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinimag.2004.08.002
- Singh S, Maxwell J, Baker JA, Nicholas JL, Lo JY. Computer-aided classification of breast masses: performance and interobserver variability of expert radiologists versus residents. Radiology 2011;258:73-80 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.10081308
- Alam SK, Feleppa EJ, Rondeau M, Kalisz A, Garra BS. Ultrasonic multi-feature analysis procedure for computer-aided diagnosis of solid breast lesions. Ultrason Imaging 2011;33:17-38 https://doi.org/10.1177/016173461103300102
- Moon WK, Chen IL, Chang JM, Shin SU, Lo CM, Chang RF. The adaptive computer-aided diagnosis system based on tumor sizes for the classification of breast tumors detected at screening ultrasound. Ultrasonics 2017;76:70-77 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2016.12.017
- Tourassi GD, Frederick ED, Markey MK, Floyd CE Jr. Application of the mutual information criterion for feature selection in computer-aided diagnosis. Med Phys 2001;28:2394-2402 https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1418724
- Newell D, Nie K, Chen JH, Hsu CC, Yu HJ, Nalcioglu O, et al. Selection of diagnostic features on breast MRI to differentiate between malignant and benign lesions using computer-aided diagnosis: differences in lesions presenting as mass and non-mass-like enhancement. Eur Radiol 2010;20:771-781 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-009-1616-y
- Yang MC, Moon WK, Wang YCF, Bae MS, Huang CS, Chen JH, et al. Robust texture analysis using multi-resolution gray-scale invariant features for breast sonographic tumor diagnosis. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2013;32:2262-2273 https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2013.2279938
- Han S, Kang HK, Jeong JY, Park MH, Kim W, Bang WC, et al. A deep learning framework for supporting the classification of breast lesions in ultrasound images. Phys Med Biol 2017;62:7714-7728 https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/aa82ec
- Russakovsky O, Deng J, Su H, Krause J, Satheesh S, Ma S, et al. Imagenet large scale visual recognition challenge. Int J Comput Vis 2015;115:211-252 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-015-0816-y
- Lee JG, Jun S, Cho YW, Lee H, Kim GB, Seo JB, et al. Deep learning in medical imaging: general overview. Korean J Radiol 2017;18:570-584 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2017.18.4.570
- Suk HI, Lee SW, Shen D; Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Hierarchical feature representation and multimodal fusion with deep learning for AD/MCI diagnosis. Neuroimage 2014;101:569-582 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.06.077
- Hua KL, Hsu CH, Hidayati SC, Cheng WH, Chen YJ. Computer-aided classification of lung nodules on computed tomography images via deep learning technique. Onco Targets Ther 2015;8:2015-2022 https://doi.org/10.2147/OTT.S80733
- Lakhani P, Sundaram B. Deep learning at chest radiography: automated classification of pulmonary tuberculosis by using convolutional neural networks. Radiology 2017;284:574-582 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2017162326
- Cheng JZ, Ni D, Chou YH, Qin J, Tiu CM, Chang YC, et al. Computer-aided diagnosis with deep learning architecture: applications to breast lesions in US images and pulmonary nodules in CT scans. Sci Rep 2016;6:24454
- Bennett B. On comparisons of sensitivity, specificity and predictive value of a number of diagnostic procedures. Biometrics 1972;28:793-800 https://doi.org/10.2307/2528763
- Barlow WE, Chi C, Carney PA, Taplin SH, D'Orsi C, Cutter G, et al. Accuracy of screening mammography interpretation by characteristics of radiologists. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96:1840-1850 https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djh333
- DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988;44:837-845 https://doi.org/10.2307/2531595
- Kim SA, Chang JM, Cho N, Yi A, Moon WK. Characterization of breast lesions: comparison of digital breast tomosynthesis and ultrasonography. Korean J Radiol 2015;16:229-238 https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2015.16.2.229
- Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-174 https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310
- Berg WA, Cosgrove DO, Dore CJ, Schafer FK, Svensson WE, Hooley RJ, et al. Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses. Radiology 2012;262:435-449 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.11110640
- Lee SH, Cho N, Chang JM, Koo HR, Kim JY, Kim WH, et al. Two-view versus single-view shear-wave elastography: comparison of observer performance in differentiating benign from malignant breast masses. Radiology 2014;270:344-353 https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13130561
- Sultan LR, Bouzghar G, Levenback BJ, Faizi NA, Venkatesh SS, Conant EF, et al. Observer variability in BI-RADS ultrasound features and its influence on computer-aided diagnosis of breast masses. Advances in Breast Cancer Research 2015;4:1-8 https://doi.org/10.4236/abcr.2015.41001