Steel and Composite Structures

Techno-Press (테크노프레스)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Optimal lateral load pattern for pushover analysis of building structures

  • Habibi, Alireza (Department of Civil Engineering, Shahed University) ;
  • Saffari, Hooman (Department of Civil Engineering, University of Kurdistan) ;
  • Izadpanah, Mehdi (Department of Civil Engineering, Kermanshah University of Technology)
  • Received : 2018.06.30
  • Accepted : 2019.05.30
  • Published : 2019.07.10
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Pushover analysis captures the behavior of a structure from fully elastic to collapse. In this analysis, the structure is subjected to increasing lateral load with constant gravity one. Neglecting the effects of the higher modes and the changes in the vibration characteristics during the nonlinear analysis are the main obstacles of the proposed lateral load patterns. To overcome these drawbacks, whereas some methods have been presented to achieve updated lateral load distribution, these methods are not precisely capable to predict the response of structures, precisely. In this study, a new method based on optimization procedure is developed to obtain a lateral load pattern for which the difference between the floor displacements of pushover and Nonlinear Dynamic Analyses (NDA) is minimal. For this purpose, an optimization problem is considered and the genetic algorithm is applied to calculate optimal lateral load pattern. Three special moment resisting steel frames with different dynamic characteristics are simulated and their optimal load patterns are derived. The floor displacements of these frames subjected to the proposed and conventional load patterns are acquired and the accuracy of them is evaluated via comparing with NDA responses. The outcomes reveal that the proposed lateral load distribution is more accurate than the previous ones.

Keywords

References

  1. Akbas, B., Tugsal, U.M. and Kara, F.I. (2009), "An evaluation of energy response and cumulative plastic rotation demand in steel moment-resisting frames through dynamic/static pushover analyses", Struct. Des. Tall Special Build., 18(4), 405-426. https://doi.org/10.1002/tal.442
  2. Amini, M.A. and Poursha, M. (2018), "Adaptive Force-Based Multimode Pushover Analysis for Seismic Evaluation of Midrise Buildings", J. Struct. Eng., 144(8), p.04018093. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002070
  3. Antoniou, S. and Pinho, R. (2004a), "Advantages and limitations of adaptive and non-adaptive force-based pushover procedures", J. Earthq. Eng., 8(4), 497-522. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460409350498
  4. Antoniou, S. and Pinho, R. (2004b), "Development and verification of a displacement-based adaptive pushover procedure", J. Eng., 8(5), 643-661.
  5. ATC-40 Report, (1996), Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings; Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA, USA.
  6. Attard, T. and Fafitis, A. (2005), "Modeling of higher-mode effects using an optimal multi-modal pushover analysis", WIT Transact. Built Environ., 81.
  7. Chen, Z., Chui, Y.H., Ni, C., Doudak, G. and Mohammad, M. (2014), "Load distribution in timber structures consisting of multiple lateral load resisting elements with different stiffnesses", J. Perform. Constr. Facil., 28(6), A4014011. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000587
  8. Chopra, A.K. and Goel, R. (2001), "Modal pushover analysis of SAC building", Proceedings of SEAOC Convention, San Diego, CA, USA.
  9. Chopra, A.K., Goel, R.K. and Chinatana-pakdee, C. (2004), "Evaluation of a modified MPA procedure assuming higher modes as elastic to estimate seismic demands", Earthq. Spectra, 20(3), 757-778. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1775237
  10. Costa, R., Providencia, P. and Ferreira, M. (2017), "Influence of joint modelling on the pushover analysis of a RC frame", Struct. Eng. Mech., Int. J., 64(5), 641-652. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2017.64.5.641
  11. Eldin, M.N., Kim, J. and Kim, J. (2018), "Optimum distribution of steel slit-friction hybrid dampers based on life cycle cost", Steel Compos. Struct., 27(5), 633-646. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2018.27.5.633
  12. Elnashai, A.S. (2001) "Advanced inelastic static (pushover) analysis for earthquake applications", Struct. Eng. Mech., Int. J., 12(1), 51-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/sem.2001.12.1.051
  13. Endo, Y., Pela, L. and Roca, P. (2017), "Review of different pushover analysis methods applied to masonry buildings and comparison with nonlinear dynamic analysis", J. Earthq. Eng., 21(8), 1234-1255. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2016.1210055
  14. Etedali, S. and Irandegani, M.A. (2015), "A proposed lateral load pattern for pushover analysis of structures subjected to earthquake excitations", J. Vibroeng., 17(3), 1363-1371.
  15. Fakhraddini, A., Fadaee, M.J. and Saffari, H. (2018), "A lateral load pattern based on energy evaluation for eccentrically braced frames", Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J., 27(5), 623-632. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2018.27.5.623
  16. Ganjavi, B., Hajirasouliha, I. and Bolourchi, A. (2016), "Optimum lateral load distribution for seismic design of nonlinear shear-buildings considering soil-structure interaction", Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., 88, 356-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.07.003
  17. Ghanoonibagha, M., Gol, M.R.A. and Ranjbar, M.R. (2016), "Study of higher mode effects and lateral load patterns in pushover analysis of steel frames with steel shear wall", Adv. Sci. Technol. Res. J., 10(29), 13-27. https://doi.org/10.12913/22998624/61926
  18. Gulkan, P. and Sozen, M.A. (1974), "Inelastic responses of reinforced concrete structures to earthquake motions", J. Am. Concrete Inst., 71(12), 604-610.
  19. Gupta, B. and Kunnath, S.K. (2000), "Adaptive spectra-based pushover procedure for seismic evaluation of structures", Earthq. Spectra, 16(2), 367-391. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586117
  20. Habibi, A. and Bidmeshki, S. (2018), "A dual approach to perform geometrically nonlinear analysis of plane truss structures", Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J., 27(1), 13-25.
  21. Izadpanah, M. and Habibi, A. (2015), "Evaluating the spread plasticity model of IDARC for inelastic analysis of reinforced concrete frames", Struct. Eng. Mech., Int. J., 56(2), 169-188. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/sem.2015.56.2.169
  22. Izadpanah, M. and Habibi, A.R. (2018), "New Spread Plasticity Model for Reinforced Concrete Structural Elements Accounting for Both Gravity and Lateral Load Effects", J. Struct. Eng., 144(5), p.04018028. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002016
  23. Jan, T.S., Liu, M.W. and Kao, Y.C. (2004), "An upper-bound pushover analysis procedure for estimating the seismic demands of high-rise buildings", Eng. Struct., 26(1), 117-128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2003.09.003
  24. Kalkan, E. and Kunnath, S.K. (2006), "Adaptive modal combination procedure for nonlinear static analysis of building structures", J. Struct. Eng., ASCE, 132(11), 1721-1731. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2006)132:11(1721)
  25. Kim, S.P. and Kurama, Y.C. (2008), "An alternative pushover analysis procedure to estimate seismic displacement demands", Eng. Struct., 30(12), 3793-3807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2008.07.008
  26. Kim, J., Kim, M. and Eldin, M.N. (2017), "Optimal distribution of steel plate slit dampers for seismic retrofit of structures", Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J., 25(4), 473-484. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2017.25.4.473
  27. Krawinkler, H. (1995), "New trends in seismic design methodology", Proceedings of European Conference on earthquake Engineering, Duma, Russia, pp. 821-830.
  28. Lawson, R.S., Vance, V. and Krawinkler, H. (1994), "Nonlinear static pushover analysis-why, when and how?", Proceedings of the 5th U.S. Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 1, 283-292.
  29. Lopez-Menjivar, M.A. (2004), "Verification of a displacementbased Adaptive Pushover method for assessment of 2-D Reinforced Concrete Buildings", Ph.D. Thesis; European School for Advances Studies in Reduction of Seismic Risk (ROSE School), University of Pavia, Italy.
  30. Mansouri, I., Soori, S., Amraie, H., Hu, J.W. and Shahbazi, S.H. (2018), "Performance based design optimum of CBFs using bee colony algorithm", Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J., 27(5), 613-622. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2018.27.5.613
  31. Mao, J., Zhai, C. and Xie, L. (2008), "An improved modal pushover analysis procedure for estimating seismic demands of structures", Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib., 7(1), 25-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-008-0786-y
  32. Ozgenoglu, M. and Arici, Y. (2017), "Comparison of ASCE/SEI Standard and modal pushover-based ground motion scaling procedures for pre-tensioned concrete bridges", Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., 13(12), 1609-1623. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2017.1310258
  33. Papanikolaou, V.K. and Elnashai, A.S. (2005), "Evaluation of conventional and adaptive pushover analysis I: Methodology", J. Earthq. Eng., 9(6), 923-941. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460509350572
  34. Papanikolaou, V.K., Elnashai, A.S. and Pareja, J.F. (2006), "Evaluation of conventional and adaptive pushover analysis II: Comparative results", J. Earthq. Eng., 10(1), 127-151. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460609350590
  35. Paret, T.F., Sasaki, K.K., Eilbeck, D.H. and Freeman, S.A. (1996), "Approximate inelastic procedures to identify failure mechanisms from higher mode effects", Proceedings of the Eleventh World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (Vol. 2).
  36. Qiao, S., Han, X., Zhou, K. and Li, W. (2017), "Conceptual configuration and seismic performance of high-rise steel braced frame", Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J., 23(2), 173-186. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2017.23.2.173
  37. Quintero-Duran, M., Candelo, J.E. and Sousa, V. (2017), "Recent trends of the most used metaheuristic techniques for distribution network reconfiguration", J. Eng. Sci. Technol. Rev., 10(5).
  38. Reinhorn, A.M., Roh, H., Sivaselvan, M., Kunnath, S., Valles, R., Madan, A., Li, C., Lobo, R. and Park, Y. (2009), IDARC 2D version 7.0: A program for the inelastic damage analysis of buildings, Buffalo, NY, USA.
  39. Saiidi, M. and Sozen, M.A. (1981), "Simple nonlinear seismic analysis of R/C structures", J. Struct. Div., ASCE, 107(ST5), 937-951. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSDEAG.0005714
  40. Sarkar, P., Prasad, A.M. and Menon, D. (2016), "Seismic evaluation of RC stepped building frames using improved pushover analysis", Earthq. Struct., 10(4), 913-938. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/eas.2016.10.4.913
  41. Shakeri, K., Shayanfar, M.A. and Kabeyasawa, T. (2010), "A story shear-based adaptive pushover procedure for estimating seismic demands of buildings", Eng. Struct., 32(1), 174-183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.09.004
  42. Shayanfar, M.A., Ashoory, M., Bakhshpoori, T. and Farhadi, B. (2013), "Optimization of modal load pattern for pushover analysis of building structures", Struct. Eng. Mech., Int. J., 47(1), 119-129. http://dx.doi.org/10.12989/sem.2013.47.1.119
  43. Tiana, L. and Qiu, C. (2018), "Modal pushover analysis of selfcentering concentrically braced frames", Struct. Eng. Mech., Int. J., 65(3), 251-261. https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2018.65.3.251
  44. Uniform Building Code (UBC) (1997), International Conference of Building Officials, Vol. 2.
  45. Zhang, Z., Pan, J., Fu, J., Singh, H.K., Pi, Y.L., Wu, J. and Rao, R. (2017), "Optimization of long span portal frames using spatially distributed surrogates", Steel Compos. Struct., Int. J., 24(2), 227-237. https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2017.24.2.227

Cited by

  1. Seismic investigation of cyclic pushover method for regular reinforced concrete bridge vol.78, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.12989/sem.2021.78.1.041
  2. A new procedure for post-buckling analysis of plane trusses using genetic algorithm vol.40, pp.6, 2019, https://doi.org/10.12989/scs.2021.40.6.817