디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제17권6호
  • /
  • Pages.201-209
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

창업 붐 확산을 위한 창업지원정책 방안 연구

A Study on Entrepreneurial support policy measures for Start-up boom spread

  • Kim, Yong-Tae (Department of Liberal Arts, Namseoul University) ;
  • Kim, Jong-Jin (Department of Entrepreneurship, Chung-Ang University)
  • 투고 : 2019.05.01
  • 심사 : 2019.06.20
  • 발행 : 2019.06.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

최근 정부 및 공공, 민간 분야의 다양한 창업경진대회를 통해 대다수의 예비 창업자 및 초기 창업자들의 비즈니스 모델이 발전되고 사업화 가능성이 제고되는 있는 반면에 일부 우수 참가자들의 사업 아이디어가 소멸되는 문제를 개선해야 할 필요가 제기되고 있다. 이에 본 연구는 국내 주요 창업경진대회 운영자와 주요 참가자 등을 대상으로 한 실태조사 결과를 기반으로 다양한 창업경진대회의 현황을 분석하고 정책적이고 실무적인 개선방안 등을 제시하고자 한다. 주요 연구 결과 첫째, 경진대회 운영에서는 이벤트 성격의 탈피, 대회 진행시 창업기업의 비즈니스 모델 공개 지양, 투입 시간을 고려한 수상금액 책정, 형식적 절차의 축소, 운영자들의 권위적인 태도 지양, 서류양식의 간소화, 발표자료 활용방식 개선, 경진대회의 목적과 모집대상의 정확한 명시 등이 요구된다. 둘째 전문성을 갖춘 심사위원 및 멘토진의 보완이 필요하겠다. 분야별로 전문성을 갖춘 심사위원 멘토 구성, 심사위원 구성 시 지역별 배분, 창업경험 보유 심사위원 위촉, 심사위원에 대한 사후 평가시스템 도입이 필요하겠다. 셋째, 제조업 등에 치중될 것이 아니라 산업분야별로 특성화된 경진대회 운영이 필요하다고 하겠다. 향후 연구에서는 운영주체들을 대상으로 심층 인터뷰 및 실증적인 연구가 보완될 필요가 있을 것이다.

Recently various start-up competitions have been held in the government, public and private sectors. There is a need to improve the business model of the majority of preliminary founders and early founders through the start - up contest, while improving the possibility of commercialization. The purpose of this study is to analyze the present status of various start - up contests based on the actual survey results of the major start - up contest operators and major participants in Korea. The main results of this study are as follows: First, in the run - up contest, there is a tendency to break out of the event personality, to prevent the opening of the business model of the entrepreneur in the competition, to reduce the formal procedure considering the input time, Improvement of the use of presentation materials, and the purpose of the contest and precise specification of the object of the recruitment. Secondly, it is necessary to establish a juror and a mentor pool with expertise. It is necessary to establish the judges and the mentor pool with expertise in each field, allocate the region according to the regional composition, entrust the judges with entrepreneurial experience, and introduce the post evaluation system for the judges after the competition. Third, most of the contest winners are manufacturing / technology-based businesses.

키워드

Table 1. Current status survey target for the start-up

DJTJBT_2019_v17n6_201_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Survey item for survey operators for the start-up competition

DJTJBT_2019_v17n6_201_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Survey on the Actual Conditions of the Startup Competition Items for the Public

DJTJBT_2019_v17n6_201_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. General Status of Respondents - Gender

DJTJBT_2019_v17n6_201_t0004.png 이미지

참고문헌

  1. BABSON et al. (2016). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2015/2016 Global Report, Global Entrepreneurship Research Association, London.
  2. R. Baron & S. Shane. (2005). Entrepreneurship : A Process perspective, Southwestern, Thomson, Cincinnati, OH 35-62.
  3. H. Barrett. (1996). Relations among corporate entrepreneurship, marketing mix factors and business performance, School of Business and Entrepreneurship, Nova Southeastern University, 45-67.
  4. B. R. Barringer. (1995). The performance implications of achieving a fit between corporate entrepreneurship and strategic management practices, The graduate school university of Missorri-Columbia, A Dissertation of Ph. D. 23-44.
  5. S. Birley & P. Westhead. (1994). A taxonomy of business start-up reasons and their impact on firm growth and size, Journal of Business Venturing, 9(4), 7-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(94)90024-8
  6. E. H. Butter & D. P. Mooer. (1997). Women's Organizational Exodus to Entrepreneurship : Self-reported Motivations and Correlates with Success, Journal of Small Business Management, 24(4), 18-29.
  7. J. G. Covin & D. P. Slevin. (1986). The development and testing of an organizational-level entrepreneurship scale, Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Wellesley, MA; Babson College, 628-639.
  8. W. B. Gartner. (1985). A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation, Academy of Management Review, 10, 696-706. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1985.4279094
  9. GEDI. (2016), Global Entrepreneurship Index 2017, The Global Entrepreneurship and Development Institute, Washington, D.C., USA.
  10. J. F. Hair & W. C. Black. (1998). Multivariate Data Analysis 5th ed. Prentice-Hall International.
  11. S. M. Hitt & D. I. Sexton. (2001). Guest editors introduction to the special issue strategic entrepreneurship : Entrepreneurial Strategics for wealth creation, Strategic Management Journal, 22(6), 479-491. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.196
  12. H. W. Yim. (2018). A Study on the Causes and Consulting Methods to Reduce the Differentiation of Incubator Center, Journal of Convergence for Information Technology, 8(1), 313-320. https://doi.org/10.22156/CS4SMB.2018.8.1.313
  13. I. C. Yoon. (2017). Effect on startup mentoring, education satisfaction, and startup intention according to the individual characteristic of university student, Journal of the Korea Convergence Society, 8(6), 265-273. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2017.8.6.265
  14. N. F. Krueger. (1993), The impact of prior entrepreneurial exposure on perceptions of new venture feasibility and desirability, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18(1), 5-21. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879301800101
  15. H. Leffel. (2008). Influencing entrepreneurial inten for new technology entrepreneurs and entrepreneurs in a university and entrepreneurs in a university environment, PICMET 2008 Proceedings, Cape Town, July.
  16. G. T. Lumpkin & G. Dess. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance, Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135-172. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1996.9602161568
  17. K. S. Manning & D. Norburn. (1989). Developing a new ventures strategy, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 14(1), 68-76.
  18. A. H. Maslow. (1943). A theory of human motivation, Psychological Review, 50, 370-396. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346
  19. D. Miller. (1983). The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms, Management Science, 29(7), 770-791. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.29.7.770
  20. OECD, Entrepreneurship at a Glance 2016, OECD Publishing, Paris.
  21. S. Scheinberg & L. C. MacMillan. (1988). An 11 Country Entrepreneurship Study of Motivations to start a Business, Frontier of Entrepreneurship Research, Wellesley, MA;Babson College, 669-687.
  22. J. A. Schumpeter. (1934). The theory of economic development, Cambridge, MA; Harvard University Press. 1934.
  23. A. Shapero. (1982). The Social Dimensions of Entrepreneurship, University of Illinois Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship.
  24. H. Stevenson & J. C. Jarllio. (1990). "A paradigm of entrepreneurship, entrepreneurial management", Journal of Strategic Management, 2, 17-27.