DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

환경영향평가 협의 시 생태통로 조성을 위한 가이드라인 마련

A Study on the Guidelines for Creating Wildlife Crossing through Environmental Impact Assessment

  • 박용수 (국립생태원 멸종위기종복원센터) ;
  • 심윤진 ((주)그룹한 어소시에이트)
  • 투고 : 2019.04.30
  • 심사 : 2019.05.31
  • 발행 : 2019.06.30

초록

본 연구는 "환경영향평가 협의 시 생물이동성 제고를 위한 법 제도적 고찰에 관한 연구"의 후속연구로 환경영향평가 협의를 통하여 조성된 대부분의 생태통로가 원목적과 부합하지 않게 조성되어 야생동물 교통사고를 저감하지 못하는 문제점을 개선하고자 수행하였다. 단절된 생태계의 연결성을 회복하기 위한 대안으로 환경영향평가 시 제시한 생태통로가 실질적인 역할을 할 수 있도록 각 단계별 고려사항을 제시하였다. 따라서 본 연구에서는 환경영향평가 협의 단계를 계획, 설계, 시공, 모니터링, 유지 관리 등 5단계로 구분하여 실무담당자가 각 단계별로 검토해야하는 구체적인 항목을 제시하였다. 이로 인하여 원목적과 부합하지 않게 조성되어 야생동물에게 외면당하는 생태통로 조성을 막아 개발 사업으로 인한 서식지 단절을 최소화하고 생물다양성을 향상시킬 수 있도록 하고자 하였다.

This study found that wildlife crossing created through environmental impact assessments didn't reduce the number of wildlife accidents on the road by review of "A Study on the Legal and Institutional Review for Reproving Bio-Mobile in Environmental Impact Assessment(2018)". Specific considerations to be reviewed at each stage of the environmental impact assessment consultation were presented for practical site application. Therefore, in this study, the consultation steps for environmental impact assessment were presented in five stages, including planning, design, construction, monitoring, maintenance and management, and detail of the items to be reviewed by public officer. It will be able to prevent loss of habitats and improve biodiversity by improving the practice and institutional problems that were planned and designed at the time of construction.

키워드

HOPHBL_2019_v28n3_287_f0001.png 이미지

Figure 1. Creation process of wildlife crossing by consultation stage of environmental impact assessment.

HOPHBL_2019_v28n3_287_f0002.png 이미지

Figures 2. A cross-sectional view of overbridge by way of illustration.

HOPHBL_2019_v28n3_287_f0003.png 이미지

Figures 3. A cross-sectional view of underpass by way of illustration.

HOPHBL_2019_v28n3_287_f0004.png 이미지

Figures 4. A cross-sectional view of amphibians·reptiles underpass by way of illustration.

Table 1. Review by the planning procedure of wildlife crossing

HOPHBL_2019_v28n3_287_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Review for wildlife crossing planning

HOPHBL_2019_v28n3_287_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Review for wildlife crossing location and type

HOPHBL_2019_v28n3_287_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Installation reviews of overbridge on soil cut-slopes area

HOPHBL_2019_v28n3_287_t0004.png 이미지

Table 5. Installation reviews of underpass in soil fill-slopes area

HOPHBL_2019_v28n3_287_t0005.png 이미지

Table 6. Installation reviews of amphibians·reptiles underpass in soil fill-slopes area

HOPHBL_2019_v28n3_287_t0006.png 이미지

Table 7. Method and review by design contents of wildlife crossing

HOPHBL_2019_v28n3_287_t0007.png 이미지

Table 8. Method and review by the construction procedure of wildlife crossing

HOPHBL_2019_v28n3_287_t0008.png 이미지

Table 9. Method and review by post-monitoring procedure of wildlife crossing

HOPHBL_2019_v28n3_287_t0009.png 이미지

Table 10. Method and review by the maintenance procedure of wildlife crossing

HOPHBL_2019_v28n3_287_t0010.png 이미지

참고문헌

  1. Cho DG. 2017. Ecological Restoration Planning and Designing. NEXUS Environmental design centre, Seoul. [Korean Literature]
  2. Clewell AF, Aronson J. 2013. Ecological Restoration: Principles, Values, and Structure of an Emerging Profession. Island Press.
  3. Galatowitsch SM. 2012. Ecological Restoration. Sunderland: Sinauer associates.
  4. Kim JK. 2015. Ecological status and improvement suggestion of an artificial wildlife corridor in Incheon. Masters dissertation, The graduate school of Inha university. [Korean Literature]
  5. Lee SJ. 2010. A study on the installation of ecological corridors. Korean Environmental Law Association 32(1): 399-431. (in Korean with English summary)
  6. MOLIT. 2010. A handbook of road design (Volume 8). [Korean Literature]
  7. MOLIT and MOE. 2015. Environmental Friendly Road Construction Guidelines. [Korean Literature]
  8. MOE. 2010. Guidelines for Design and Management of Wildlife Crossing Structures in Korea. [Korean Literature]
  9. MOE. 2013. Guidelines for the Environmental Impact Assessment on the Creation and Management of Alternative Habitats. [Korean Literature]
  10. MOE. 2017. A Study on the Guidelines for the Improvement of Biomability in Environmental Impact Assessment. [Korean Literature]
  11. NIE. 2015. Guidelines for the Design of Natural Environment Conservation Projects. [Korean Literature]
  12. NIE. 2017. The study on the Guidelines for Improvement of Biological Mobility. [Korean Literature]
  13. Park JH, Yoo HS, Park MY. 2009. A Study on Assessment Items Analysis for Eco-corridors Area: Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process. Korean Society of Environment Impact Assessment. 18(5): 301-312. [Korean Literature]
  14. Park JJ, Woo DG, Oh DH, Park CH. 2012. Site Selection of Wildlife Passage for Leopard Cat in Urban Area using Space Syntax. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 40(1): 92-99. [Korean Literature] https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2012.40.1.092
  15. Park SI, Lee GJ. 2014. A study on building methodology for identifying Road-kill hot spots on Highways and Its empirical application. Journal of Korea Planning Association 50(3): 319-333. [Korean Literature]
  16. Shim YJ, Jung GJ, Eo YJ, Ryu YJ, Park HJ, Chang MH, Lee TH, Kim JK, Park SG, Chang EH, Chu YS, Park YS. 2018. A Study on the Legal and Institutional Review for Improving Bio-Mobility in Environmental Impact Assessment. J. Korean Env. Res. Tech. 21(1): 145-155. [Korean Literature]
  17. Woo DG, Choi TY, Seo HS, Lee DH, Park YS, Park HB, Moon HG, Cha JG, Lee SM, Park HY, Seo BS, Jong JK, Park JJ, Lee SK, Park YJ, Cheon GS, Kim KA, Kim JM, Choi JC. 2015. A study on analysis of habitat fragmentation and improvement of wildlife passage effectiveness. National Institute of Ecology. [Korean Literature]