DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Vascular Injuries Due to Penetrating Missile Trauma in Anti-Terrorism Ops

  • Received : 2018.08.07
  • Accepted : 2018.10.18
  • Published : 2019.06.30

Abstract

Purpose: Penetrating vascular trauma though less common poses a challenge to all Surgeons. This study was designed to analyse the profile, management modalities of vascular trauma and the outcomes thereof at a Trauma Care Centre in a Tertiary care setting in hostile environment in India. Methods: A prospective review of all patients with arterial and venous injuries being transferred to the Trauma Center at out Tertiary Care Center between June 2015 and May 2018 was done. Demographics, admission data, treatment, and complications were reviewed. Results: There were a total of 46 patients with 65 vascular injuries, 39 arterial injuries and 26 venous injuries. The age range was 21 to 47 years. Nineteen patients had both arterial and venous injuries. A total of 42 cases presented within 12 hours of injury and complete arterial transections were found in 33 cases (80.49%). There were three mortalities (6.52%) and three amputations (8.33%). The overall limb salvage rate was 91.67% with popliteal artery being the commonest injured artery. Poor prognosticators for limb salvage were increasing time to present to the trauma centre, hypovolemic shock, multi-organ trauma and associated venous injuries. Conclusions: Penetrating missile trauma leading to vascular injuries has not been widely reported. Attempting limb salvage even in cases with delayed presentation should be weighed with the threat to life before revascularisation and should preferably be done at a centre with vascular expertise. A team approach with vascular, orthopaedic, general surgeons, and critical care anaesthesiologists all aboard improve the outcomes manifold. Use of tourniquets and early fasciotomies have been emphasized as is the use of native veins as the bypass conduit. This is probably the largest study on penetrating Vascular trauma in anti-terrorism ops from the Indian subcontinent. It highlights the significance of prompt recognition and availability of vascular expertise in optimally managing cases of vascular trauma.

Keywords

References

  1. He JC, Clancy K, Schechtman D, Conrad-Schnetz KJ, Claridge JA. Traumatic vascular injuries: who are repairing them and what are the outcomes? Am J Surg 2016;211:619-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.11.011
  2. DeBakey ME, Simeone FA. Battle injuries of the arteries in World War II: an analysis of 2,471 cases. Ann Surg 1946;123:534-79. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-194604000-00005
  3. Hughes CW. Arterial repair during the Korean War. Ann Surg 1958;147:555-61.
  4. Rich NM, Baugh JH, Hughes CW. Acute arterial injuries in Vietnam: 1,000 cases. J Trauma 1970;10:359-69. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-197005000-00001
  5. Starnes BW, Beekley AC, Sebesta JA, Andersen CA, Rush RM Jr. Extremity vascular injuries on the battlefield: tips for surgeons deploying to war. J Trauma 2006;60:432-42. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ta.0000197628.55757.de
  6. Diamond S, Gaspard D, Katz S. Vascular injuries to the extremities in a suburban trauma center. Am Surg 2003;69:848-51.
  7. Mattox KL, Feliciano DV, Burch J, Beall AC Jr, Jordan GL Jr, De Bakey ME. Five thousand seven hundred sixty cardiovascular injuries in 4459 patients. Epidemiologic evolution 1958 to 1987. Ann Surg 1989;209:698. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-198906000-00007
  8. Beebe GW, DeBakey ME. Battle casualties: incidence, mortality and logistic considerations. Illinois: Springfield and Charles C. Thomas publishers; 1952.
  9. Oller DW, Rutledge R, Clancy T, Cunningham P, Thomason M, Meredith W, et al. Vascular injuries in a rural state: a review of 978 patients from a state trauma registry. J Trauma 1992;32:740-5; discussion 745-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199206000-00012
  10. Farber A, Tan TW, Hamburg NM, Kalish JA, Joglar F, Onigman T, et al. Early fasciotomy in patients with extremity vascular injury is associated with decreased risk of adverse limb outcomes: a review of the National Trauma Data Bank. Injury 2012;43:1486-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2011.06.006
  11. Sciaretta JD, Macedo FI, Otero CA, Figueroa JN, Pizano LR, Namias N. Management of traumatic popliteal vascular injuries in a level I trauma center: a 6-year experience. Int J Surg 2015;18:136-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.04.056
  12. Menakuru SR, Behera A, Jindal R, Kaman L, Doley R, Venkatesan R. Extremity vascular trauma in civilian population: a seven-year review from North India. Injury 2005;36:400-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2004.06.017
  13. Passos E, Dingley B, Smith A, Engels PT, Ball CG, Faidi S, et al. Tourniquet use for peripheral vascular injuries in the civilian setting. Injury 2014;45:573-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2013.11.031
  14. Brenner M, Hoehn M, Teeter W, Stein D, Scalea T. Trading scalpels for sheaths: catheter-based treatment of vascular injury can be effectively performed by acute care surgeons trained in endovascular techniques. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2016;80:783-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000001006
  15. Feliciano DV. For the patient-evolution in the management of vascular trauma. J Trauma Acute Care Surg 2017;83:1205-12. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000001689