Fig. 1. Three dimensional diagram of the pilot experimental electrolytic cell
Fig. 2. Diagram of the experimental apparatus
Fig. 3. Current efficiency of the PGN membrane and the Al2O3 ceramic membrane at different cell voltage at an electrolyte flow rate of 1.5 L min-1
Fig. 4. Energy consumption of the PGN membrane and the Al2O3 ceramic membrane at different cell voltage at an electrolyte flow rate of 1.5 L min-1
Fig. 5. Current efficiency of the PGN membrane and the Al2O3 ceramic membrane at different electrolyte flow rate at the cell voltage of 4.5 V and 5.5 V, respectively
Fig. 6. Energy consumption of the PGN membrane and the Al2O3 ceramic membrane at different electrolyte flow rate at the cell voltage of 4.5 V and 5.5 V, respectively
Fig. 7. Effect of the electrolysis time of electrolytes on current efficiency
Fig. 8. Effect of the electrolysis time of electrolytes on energy consumption
Table 1. The properties of the PGN membrane
Table 2. The properties of the Al2O3 ceramic membrane
참고문헌
- S.H. Lee, J.M. Koo, S.G. Oh, et al, Mater. Chem. Phy., 2017, 194, 313-321. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2017.03.053
- M.K. Nizam, D. Sebastian, M.I. Kairi, et al., Sains Malay., 2017, 46, 1039-1045. https://doi.org/10.17576/jsm-2017-4607-05
- L.R. Bennedsen, In situ chemical oxidation: The Mechanisms and Applications of Chemical Oxidants for Remediation Purposes, Elsevier B.V., Amsterdam, 2014.
- N. Xu, Guangdong Chem. Ind. (Natural Science Edition), 2015, 42, 114-114.
- K.K. Hii, K. Hellgardt, G.H. Kelsall, et al., Apparatus and method for production of oxidants, WO/2016/193738A1.
- D. Liu, Chem. Eng. Des. Commun., 43, 107(2017).
- S.K. Amin, M.H. Roushdy, S.A. El-Sherbiny, et al, Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res., 2016, 11(12), 7708-7721.
- J.R. Davis, J.C. Baygents, J. Farrell, Electrochim. Acta, 2014, 44(7), 841-848.
- J.R. Davis, J.C. Baygents, J. Farrell, Electrochim. Acta, 2014, 44(7), 841-848.
- V.B. Martos, E. Herrero, J.M. Feliu, J. Electrochim. Acta, 2017, 241, 497-509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2017.04.162
- Z.F. Pan, L. An, T.S. Zhao, et al, Prog. in Energy. Combust. Sci, 2018, 66, 141-175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2018.01.001
- S. Paul, J. Electrochem. Sci. Technol., 2016, 7(2), 115-131. https://doi.org/10.5229/JECST.2016.7.2.115
- G.J. Hwanga, S.W. Kimb, D.M. In, et al., J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 2018, 60, 360-365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2017.11.023
- H. Feng, Y. Xiong, B. Wu, J. Chem. Ind. Eng.(China), 2017, 68, 4691-4701.
- H. Strathmann, A. Grabowski, G. Eigenberger, J. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 2013, 52(31), 10364-10379. https://doi.org/10.1021/ie4002102
- J. Zhao, P. Sun, L. Wang, et al., J. Zhengzhou Univ. (Engineering Science), 2006, 27, 109-112. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-6833.2006.01.027
- H. Nan, Y. Wang, Chem. Ind. Eng., 2013, 30, 53-58.
- J. Zhu, K.K. Hii, K. Hellgardt, J. Acs Sustain. Chem. Eng., 2016, 4, 2027-2036 https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b01372
- C. Wang, J.B. Zhou, L.P. Gao, J. Electrochem. Sci. Technol., 2018, 9(1), 37-41. https://doi.org/10.5229/JECST.2018.9.1.37
- Y. Wan, S. Xia, Water. Purif. Technol., 2016, 35, 102-104.
- H. Vogt, Electrochim. Acta, 2012, 78, 183-187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2012.05.124
- A. Li, S. Wang, X. Song, Environ. Sci. Manag., 2017, 42, 102-105.
- K. Tangphant, K. Sudaprasert, S. Channarong, Russ. J. Electrochem., 2014, 50(3), 253-259. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1023193514030136
- D. Zhang, X. Song, J. Dong, Chlor-Alkali Ind., 2016, 52, 19-20.
- Y. Wang, Y. Xiong, J. Zhang, J. Southeast Univ., 2015, 45, 738-744. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1001-0505.2015.04.022