DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

APPROXIMATED SEPARATION FORMULA FOR THE HELMHOLTZ EQUATION

  • Received : 2018.11.11
  • Accepted : 2018.12.14
  • Published : 2019.06.25

Abstract

The Helmholtz equation represents acoustic or electromagnetic scattering phenomena. The Method of Lines are known to have many advantages in simulation of forward and inverse scattering problems due to the usage of angle rays and Bessel functions. However, the method does not account for the jump phenomena on obstacle boundary and the approximation includes many high order Bessel functions. The high order Bessel functions have extreme blow-up or die-out features in resonance region obstacle boundary. Therefore, in particular, when we consider shape reconstruction problems, the method is suffered from severe instabilities due to the logical confliction and the severe singularities of high order Bessel functions. In this paper, two approximation formulas for the Helmholtz equation are introduced. The formulas are new and powerful. The derivation is based on Method of Lines, Huygen's principle, boundary jump relations, Addition Formula, and the orthogonality of the trigonometric functions. The formulas reduce the approximation dimension significantly so that only lower order Bessel functions are required. They overcome the severe instability near the obstacle boundary and reduce the computational time significantly. The convergence is exponential. The formulas adopt the scattering jump phenomena on the boundary, and separate the boundary information from the measured scattered fields. Thus, the sensitivities of the scattered fields caused by the boundary changes can be analyzed easily. Several numerical experiments are performed. The results show the superiority of the proposed formulas in accuracy, efficiency, and stability.

Keywords

HNSHCY_2019_v41n2_403_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1(a). Kite

HNSHCY_2019_v41n2_403_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 1(b). Peanut

HNSHCY_2019_v41n2_403_f0003.png 이미지

Fig. 1(c). Non-symmetric

HNSHCY_2019_v41n2_403_f0004.png 이미지

Fig. 2(a). |us|

HNSHCY_2019_v41n2_403_f0005.png 이미지

Fig. 2(b). Angle(us)

HNSHCY_2019_v41n2_403_f0006.png 이미지

Fig. 3(a). |us|

HNSHCY_2019_v41n2_403_f0007.png 이미지

Fig. 3(b). Angle(us)

HNSHCY_2019_v41n2_403_f0008.png 이미지

Fig. 4(a). |us|

HNSHCY_2019_v41n2_403_f0009.png 이미지

Fig. 4(b). Angle(us)

TABLE 1. L2-Errors (θ = 0, ρ = 20, N = 128)

HNSHCY_2019_v41n2_403_t0001.png 이미지

References

  1. H. Ammari, An Introduction to Mathematics of Emerging Biomedical Imaging (Mathematiques et Application), Springer, 2008.
  2. M. Belonosov, M. Dmitriev, V. Kostin, D. Neklyudov, V. Tcheverda, An iterative solver for the 3D Helmholtz equation, J. Computational Physics 345 (2017), 330-344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2017.05.026
  3. D. Colton and R. Kress, Inverse Acoustic and Electromagnetic Scattering Theory (3rd Ed), Springer, Berlin, 2013.
  4. U. Guo, F. Ma, and D. Zhang, An optimization method for acoustic inverse obstacle scattering problems with multiple incident waves, Inverse Problems in Science and Engineering 19 (2011), 461-484. https://doi.org/10.1080/17415977.2010.518286
  5. B. Guzina, F. Cakoni, and C. Bellis, On multi-frequency obstacle reconstruction via linear sampling method, Inverse Problems 26 (2010) 125005(29pp). https://doi.org/10.1088/0266-5611/26/12/125005
  6. M. Hooshyar, An inverse problem of electromagnetic scattering and the Method of Lines, Microwave and Optical Technology Letters, 29(6) (2001), 420-426. https://doi.org/10.1002/mop.1197
  7. O. Ivanyshyn, Shape reconstruction of acoustic obstacles from the modulus of the far field pattern, Inverse Problems and Imaging Vol 1 No 4(2007), 609-622. https://doi.org/10.3934/ipi.2007.1.609
  8. O. Ivanyshyn and T. Johansson, Nonlinear integral equation methods for the reconstruction of an acoustically sound-soft obstacle, Journal of Integral equations and applications Vol 19 No 3 (2007), 289-308. https://doi.org/10.1216/jiea/1190905488
  9. N. Jeong, Inverse Scattering Problem Based on the Method of Lines, Master Thesis, Department of Mathematics, Chosun University, 2013.
  10. T. Johansson and B. D. Sleeamn, Reconstruction of an acoustically sound-soft obstacle from one incident field and the far field pattern, IMA J. Appl. Math. 72(2007), 96-112. https://doi.org/10.1093/imamat/hxl026
  11. J. Kong, Electromagnetic Wave Theory, 2nd Ed., Wiley, New York, 1990.
  12. J. Lee and S. Kang, Complex nonlinear parameter estimation(CNPE) and obstacle shape reconstruction, Computers and Mathematics with Applications 67 (2014), 1631-1642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2014.02.011
  13. J. Lee and S. Kang, Obstacle shape reconstruction by locally supported basis functions, Honam Mathematical Journal 36 (2014), 831-852. https://doi.org/10.5831/HMJ.2014.36.4.831
  14. K. Leem, J. Liu, and G. Pelekanos, Two direct factorization methods for inverse scattering problems, Inverse Problems 34 (2018), 125004 (26pp). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6420/aae15e
  15. J. Ma, T. Chia, T. Tan, and K. See, Electromagnetic wave scattering from 2-D cylinder by using the Method of Lines, Microwave and Optical Technology Letters 24(4) (2000), 275-277. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1098-2760(20000220)24:4<275::AID-MOP19>3.0.CO;2-1
  16. D. Nguyen, M. Klibanov, L. Nguyen,m A. Kolesov, M. Fiddy, and H. Liu, Numerical solution of a coefficient inverse problem with multi-frequency experimen-tal raw data by a globally convergent algorithm, J. Computational Physics 345 (2017), 17-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2017.05.015