인간행동과 음악연구 (Journal of Music and Human Behavior)

  • 제16권1호
  • /
  • Pages.73-88
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 2288-2774(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2799-9076(eISSN)
한국음악치료교육학회 (Korean Music Therapy Education Association)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

리듬꼴에 따른 건강 노인과 경도인지장애 노인의 리듬 재산출 수행력 비교

Reproducing Rhythmic Idioms: A Comparison Between Healthy Older Adults and Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment

  • 정현주 (이화여자대학교 대학원 음악치료학과, 이화뮤직웰니스연구센터) ;
  • 이은지 (이화여자대학교 예술교육치료연구소)
  • Chong, Hyun Ju (Department of Music Therapy, Graduate School, Ewha Womans University, Ewha Music Wellness) ;
  • Lee, Eun Ji (Art Education and Therapy Institute, Ewha Womans University)
  • 투고 : 2019.05.02
  • 심사 : 2019.05.24
  • 발행 : 2019.05.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 건강 및 경도인지장애 노인의 리듬 재산출 수행력의 차이를 살펴보기 위해 실시되었다. 연구 대상자는 S시 및 A시 소재의 경로당, 치매안심센터, 노인 복지관 등 노인이용기관을 이용하는 만 60세 이상 85세 미만으로 자발적으로 참여를 원하는 건강 노인 30명과 경도인지장애로 진단받은 노인 27명으로 총 57명이다. 모든 검사는 개별적으로 진행되었고 리듬수행과제는 Beat Processing Device(BPD) 앱이 설치된 아이패드를 사용하였다. 본 연구에서 사용된 BPD에는 6가지 리듬꼴이 저장되어 있으며 참여자는 무작위로 재생된 리듬꼴을 듣고 동일하게 2회 재산출하였다. 재산출된 리듬은 전산적으로 저장되었으며 결과 분석을 위해 박간의 간격 비율(R)을 계산하였다. 연구 결과, 건강 노인과 경도인지장애 노인의 리듬 재산출 수행력의 평균값에는 차이가 있었으나 통계적으로 유의하지는 않았다. 박 간의 간격 비율(R)에서 두 집단 모두 <♩ ♩>에서 일치도가 가장 높았으며, <♩. ♪>에서 그 일치도가 가장 낮았다. 수행력 전반에서 건강 노인과 경도인지장애노인 집단 간 유의한 차이는 없었으며, 리듬과제 수행 반복에 따라 두 번째 수행에서 통계적으로 유의하게 낮아진 수행력을 확인할 수 있었다. 이러한 결과는 건강 및 경도인지장애 노인의 리듬 재산출 수행력에 차이는 없었지만 리듬꼴에 따른 난이도를 확인할 수 있었다는 점에서 의의가 있다. 이는 추후 노인 대상 음악치료에서 리듬 연주를 구성할 시 참고할 수 있는 자료로 활용될 수 있다.

This research was conducted to compare the rhythm reproduction abilities between older adults with and without mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and analyze the abilities depending on the rhythm idiom. Participants between 60-85 years of age were recruited from senior community centers, dementia prevention centers, and senior welfare centers. A total of 57 participants were included in this study: 27 diagnosed with MCI and 30 healthy older adults (HOA). The experiment was conducted individually in a private room in which a participant was given random binary time rhythm idioms and instructed to reproduce the rhythmic idioms with finger tapping. Each participant's beat production was recorded with the Beat Processing Device (BPD) for iPad. BPD calculated rhythm reproduction as measured through rhythm ratio and error among beats. Results showed marginal differences between the two groups in terms of mean scores of rhythm reproduction abilities. In terms of the rhythm ratio among beats, both groups' highest rhythm reproduction rate was for <♩ ♩>, and their lowest reproduction rate was for <♩. ♪>. In conclusion, there was no significant difference in rhythm reproduction ability between the HOA and MCI groups. However, the study found an interesting result related to performance level of rhythmic idioms. This result provides therapeutic insight for formulating rhythm tasks for older adults.

키워드

HKOOBX_2019_v16n1_73_f0001.png 이미지

The R index depending on rhythm idiom during the first trial of rhythm reproduction.

HKOOBX_2019_v16n1_73_f0002.png 이미지

The R index depending on rhythm idiom during the second trial of rhythm reproduction.

HKOOBX_2019_v16n1_73_f0003.png 이미지

The R index depending on the trial in each group.

Demographic Information of Healthy Older Adults and Older Adults With MCI (N = 57)

HKOOBX_2019_v16n1_73_t0001.png 이미지

Rhythm Idiom and Test Items Used for Rhythm Reproduction Tasks

HKOOBX_2019_v16n1_73_t0002.png 이미지

Quantification of the R Index for Rhythm Reproduction Performance

HKOOBX_2019_v16n1_73_t0003.png 이미지

The R Index of HOA and MCI Groups During the First Trial of Rhythm Reproduction

HKOOBX_2019_v16n1_73_t0004.png 이미지

The R Index of HOA and MCI Groups During the Second Trial of Rhythm Reproduction

HKOOBX_2019_v16n1_73_t0005.png 이미지

The R Index of HOA and MCI Groups Depending on Rhythm Idiom and Trial

HKOOBX_2019_v16n1_73_t0006.png 이미지

참고문헌

  1. Biasutti, M., & Mangiacotti, A. (2018). Assessing a cognitive music training for older participants: A randomised controlled trial. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 33(2), 271-278. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.4721
  2. Duerksen, G., & Chong, H. J. (2013). Preliminary study on developing protocol for music therapy assessment for cognitive and emotional-behavioral domain using rhythm (MACED-Rhythm). Journal of Music and Human Behavior, 10(1), 67-83. https://doi.org/10.21187/JMHB.2013.10.1.067
  3. Fitch, W. T., & Rosenfeld, A. J. (2007). Perception and production of syncopated rhythms. Music Perception: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25(1), 43-58. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2007.25.1.43
  4. Fitzgibbons, P. J., & Gordon-Salant, S. (2015). Age effects in discrimination of intervals within rhythmic tone sequences. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 137(1), 388-396. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.4904554
  5. Freigang, C., Schmidt, L., Wagner, J., Eckardt, R., Steinhagen-Thiessen, E., Ernst, A., & Rubsamen, R. (2011). Evaluation of central auditory discrimination abilities in older adults. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 3, 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2011.00006
  6. Grassi, M., & Borella, E. (2013). The role of auditory abilities in basic mechanisms of cognition in older adults. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 5, 59. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2013.00059
  7. Han, S. W. (2017). Difference of cognitive function with general characteristics in normal elderly subjects and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) elderly. The Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 8(4), 255-266.
  8. Iannarilli, F., Pesce, C., Persichini, C., & Capranica, L. (2013). Age-related changes of rhythmic ability in musically trained and untrained individuals. Sport Science for Health, 9, 43-50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11332-013-0144-y
  9. Iannarilli, F., Vannozzi, G., Iosa, M., Pesce, C., & Capranica, L. (2013). Effects of task complexity on rhythmic reproduction performance in adults. Human Movement Science, 32(1), 203-213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2012.12.004
  10. Jerde, T. A., Childs, S. K., Handy, S. T., Nagode, J. C., & Pardo, J. V. (2011). Dissociable systems of working memory for rhythm and melody. NeuroImage, 57(4), 1572-1579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.05.061
  11. Konoike, N., Kotozaki, Y., Miyachi, S., Miyauchi, C. M., Yomogida, Y., Akimoto, Y., ... Nakamura, K. (2012). Rhythm information represented in the fronto-parieto-cerebellar motor system. NeuroImage, 63(1), 328-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.07.002
  12. Krampe, R. T., Mayr, U., & Kliegl, R. (2005). Timing, sequencing, and executive control in repetitive movement production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31(3), 379-397. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.31.3.379
  13. Lee, Y. K. (1998). A review of the related literature concerning the psychological principles of rhythmic response and the perception of musical rhythms. Society for Pentecostal Studies in Korea, 17, 45-94.
  14. Longuet-Higgins, H. C., & Lee, C. S. (1982). The perception of musical rhythms. Perception, 11(2), 115-128. https://doi.org/10.1068/p110115
  15. Morris, J. C. (2005). Mild cognitive impairment and preclinical Alzheimer's disease. Geriatrics, 60(Suppl.), 9-14. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=18889206&lang=ko&site=eds-live
  16. Oh, S. Y., & Chong, H. J. (2016). Correlation between rhythm reproduction task performance and cognitive function in school-aged children. Journal of Music and Human Behavior, 13(1), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.21187/jmhb.2016.13.1.001
  17. Park, Y. J. (2015). A study on the correlation between executive function and rhythm performance capabilities of middle school students (Unpublished master's thesis). Ewha Womans University, Seoul.
  18. Petersen, R. C., Smith, G. E., Waring, S. C., Ivnik, R. J., Tangalos, E. G., & Kokmen, E. (1999). Mild cognitive impairment: Clinical characterization and outcome. Archives of Neurology, 56(3), 303-308. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.56.3.303
  19. Ragot, R., Fernandez, A.-M., & Pouthas, V. (2002). Time, music, and aging. Psychomusicology: A Journal of Research in Music Cognition, 18(1-2), 28-45. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0094053
  20. Ryu, H. J. (2010). The comparison on SNSB performance among normal aged persons, mild cognitive impairment and early dementia (Unpublished master's thesis). Daegu University, Gyeongsan.
  21. Ryu, H. K. (2017). Reproduction ability of rhythm patterns for the elderly (Unpublished master's thesis). Ewha Womans University, Seoul.
  22. Saito, S. (2001). The phonological loop and memory for rhythms: An individual differences approach. Memory, 9(4-6), 313-322. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658210143000164
  23. Trainor, L. J., & Adams, B. (2000). Infants’ and adults’ use of duration and intensity cues in the segmentation of tone patterns. Perception & Psychophysics, 62(2), 333-340. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03205553
  24. Vanneste, S., Pouthas, V., & Wearden, J. H. (2001). Temporal control of rhythmic performance: A comparison between young and old adults. Experimental Aging Research, 27(1), 83-102. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610730125798
  25. Wolf, D. L. (2004). A hierarchy of rhythm performance patterns for kindergarten children. Visions of Research in Music Education, 4. Retrieved from http://www-usr.rider.edu/-vrme/
  26. Won, S. R. (2014). Study on the rhythm performance capabilities of intellectual disability teenagers (Unpublished master's thesis). Ewha Womans University, Seoul.
  27. Wu, X., Westanmo, A., Zhou, L., & Pan, J. (2013). Serial binary interval ratios improve rhythm reproduction. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 512. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00512