DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Verification on Separation Distance Criteria when Transporting Dangerous Goods in Korea Railroad

국내 철도 위험물 운송 시 격리차 운영기준 안전성 검증

  • Lee, Byeongwoo (Department of Environmental and Safety Engineering, Ajou University) ;
  • Park, Dasung (Department of Environmental and Safety Engineering, Ajou University) ;
  • Kang, Taesun (Department of Health and Safety Engineering, Semyung University) ;
  • Jung, Seungho (Department of Environmental and Safety Engineering, Ajou University)
  • 이병우 (아주대학교 환경안전공학과) ;
  • 박다성 (아주대학교 환경안전공학과) ;
  • 강태선 (세명대학교 보건안전공학과) ;
  • 정승호 (아주대학교 환경안전공학과)
  • Received : 2018.12.13
  • Accepted : 2019.03.19
  • Published : 2019.04.30

Abstract

After the Tianjin Port explosion on 2015, it is highlighted that securing safety for dangerous goods in Korea and try to establish safety standards for railroad dangerous substances transport. In Korea, the regulation for the transport of dangerous goods is stipulated to need 3 buffer cars. However, It is inefficient that 3 buffer cars. because 3 buffer cars, increase transportation too much costs in transit and it is too strict compared to other country rules. The purpose of this study was to improve transportation efficiency by mitigating the criteria for isolated railroads through rational safety assessment. In order to verify this, we used a risk assessment software which is PHAST 7.2 developed by DNV GL. We calculated safety distances that could prevent ignitions setting up scenarios when relief system work installed on a train loaded with propylene, nonane. As a result, we confirmed that buffer cars can be reduced from three to one. This result would be implemented in the application of Korail.

Keywords

HOJHB0_2019_v34n2_28_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Tianjin explosions, Tianjin, China, 2015.

HOJHB0_2019_v34n2_28_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. Blue print of Electric Locomotive.

HOJHB0_2019_v34n2_28_f0003.png 이미지

Fig. 3. Railroad of dangerous substances transport.

HOJHB0_2019_v34n2_28_f0004.png 이미지

Fig. 4. Sideview of LFL 20,000 ppm endpoint distance release from propylene relief system.

HOJHB0_2019_v34n2_28_f0005.png 이미지

Fig. 5. Sideview of LFL 10,000 ppm endpoint distance release from propylene relief system.

HOJHB0_2019_v34n2_28_f0006.png 이미지

Fig. 6. Sideview of LFL 5,000 ppm endpoint distance release from propylene relief system.

HOJHB0_2019_v34n2_28_f0007.png 이미지

Fig. 7. Sideview of LFL 8,000 ppm endpoint distance release from nonane relief system.

HOJHB0_2019_v34n2_28_f0008.png 이미지

Fig. 8. Sideview of LFL 4,000 ppm endpoint distance release from nonane relief system.

HOJHB0_2019_v34n2_28_f0009.png 이미지

Fig. 9. Sideview of LFL 2,000 ppm endpoint distance release from nonane relief system.

Table 1. Transport status and analysis conditions of propylene and oil (aircraft, kerosene)

HOJHB0_2019_v34n2_28_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Material information of JP-8, Kerosene, Octane, Nonane, Dodecane

HOJHB0_2019_v34n2_28_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Scenarios used in the model

HOJHB0_2019_v34n2_28_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Distance of propylene, nonane(LFL, 1/2 LFL, 1/4 LFL)

HOJHB0_2019_v34n2_28_t0004.png 이미지

References

  1. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport, "Railroad Safety Act", 2015.
  2. Korail, Regulation for Train Operation(2015)
  3. T. B. Kim, "Analysis of LPG Facility Siting Considering BLEVE", J. Korean Soc. Saf., Vol. 31, No. 2, pp. 26-32, 2016. https://doi.org/10.14346/JKOSOS.2016.31.2.26
  4. H. Y. Kim, "Investigation on Damage Effect Distance for High Pressure underground Flammable Gas Pipeline", J. Korean Soc. Saf., Vol. 33, No. 3, pp. 33-38, 2018. https://doi.org/10.14346/JKOSOS.2018.33.3.33
  5. S. G. LEE, "A Study on Quantitative Risk Assessment Method and Risk Reduction Measures for Rail Hazardous Material Transportation", J. Korean Society of Societal Security, Vol 1, No 3, pp. 69-76, 2007.
  6. J. H. LEE, "Risk Assessment and Safety Control for Rail Transportation of Hazardous materials around Railroad Station", Master thesis, 2011.
  7. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, and Transport, "Dangerous Goods Code", 2013.
  8. DNV GL, "Unified Dispersion Model THEORY", 2016.
  9. KOSHA, "Technical Guidelines for Installation and Maintenance of Flammable Gas Detection and Alarm Devices", 2013.
  10. M. Sam Mannan, "LNG Safety Excellence: A Decade of Efforts by the Mary Kay O'Connor Process Safety Center, 2016.
  11. Korean Agency for Technology and Standards, " KS C IEC 60079-10-1", 2017.