제조국가별 국가연구시설장비 구축 현황에 따른 국산연구장비 산업 활성화 정책 제언: 기초·분석과학 분야 중심으로

Policy Suggestions for Korean Research Equipment Industry According to the State of Construction of National Research Facility and Equipment by Country of Manufacture : Focusing on Basic and Analytical Science Field

Abstract

본 연구의 목적은 과거 14년간 한국 정부가 투자한 연구시설 장비의 구축정보를 기반으로 제조국가별로 기초 분석과학 분야의 연구시설 장비 구축 수와 구축금액 차이를 비교 분석하여 국산연구장비의 시장규모와 시장점유의 수준을 알아보고자 하였다. 2019년 1월 1일을 기준으로 2005년부터 2018년까지 국내에 구축되고, 기초 분석과학 분야에 활용되는 연구시설 장비(구축금액이 3천만원 이상인 주장비 기준) 20,687점의 구성, 장비표준분류, 구축 수, 그리고 구축금액을 제조국가별로 분석하였다. 제조국가별 연구시설 장비 구축 수 차이를 비교 분석하기 위하여 단일표본 카이제곱검정 방법을, 구축금액 차이를 비교 분석하기 위하여 일요인 분산분석 방법과 본페로니 사후검정 분석을 사용하였다. 본 연구결과, 각 제조국가별로 연구시설 장비 구축 수(p<.001)와 구축금액(p<.05)은 통계학적으로 유의하게 차이가 있었으며 특히, 장비표준분류에 따라 국내 기업의 연구시설 장비 점유 규모가 통계학적으로 유의하게 상이하였다(p<.05). 따라서 기초 분석과학 분야에 대한 연구장비 국산화 정책 지원 시, 장비유형 및 구축금액별로 정부의 차별화된 전략과 함께 상이한 정책연구 기획이 필요할 것으로 사료된다.

The purpose of the current study was to investigate the level of market size and market share of domestic research equipments for analyzing the difference of the number and amount of construction by the manufacturing countries in the basic and analytical science fields based on the information of the research equipment invested by the Korean government for the past 14 years. As of January 1 2019, from 2005 to 2018, 20,687 research facilities & equipments (main equipment with a construction cost of 30 million won or more) built in the basic and analytical science fields were selected for this study and their components, standard classification, number of construction, and amount of construction by country of manufacture were analyzed. Differences of the number and amount of construction among manufacturing countries were tested using a single sample chi-square test and one-way analysis of variance, followed by Bonferroni's post-hoc test. As a result of this study, the number of construction (p<.001) and construction amount (p<.05) were statistically different for each manufacturing country. The level of market size and market share was significantly different according to the equipment standard classification (p<.05). Therefore, differentiated strategies of the government and policy research projects will be required for each type of equipment and amount in order to support the policy for the localization of research equipment.

Fig. 1. Selection process of analyzed Korean’s Research Facilities & Equipment

Fig. 2. Comparison of the total number of national research facilities & equipment construction by country of manufacture in Korea

Fig. 3. Comparison of the total amount ofconstruction of national research facility equipment by country of manufacture in Korea

Table 1. The analyzed target group* in the national research facility equipment standard classification system

Table 2. Comparison of the number of national research facility equipment by country of manufacture in Korea

Table 3. Comparison of the amount of national research facility equipment by country of manufacture in Korea