실천공학교육논문지 (Journal of Practical Engineering Education)

  • 제11권1호
  • /
  • Pages.9-15
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 2288-405X(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-4068(eISSN)
한국실천공학교육학회 (Korean Institute for Pratical Engineering Education)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

공과대학생의 종합설계에 대한 창의융합 인식 비교

The Awareness Comparison about Creative Converged Competence for the Capstone Design among Engineering Students

  • 윤석범 (공주대학교 광공학과) ;
  • 장은영 (공주대학교 전기전자제어공학부)
  • Yoon, Seok-Beom (Department of Optical Engineering, Kongju National University) ;
  • Chang, Eun-Young (Div. of Electrical, Electronics & Control Engineering, Kongju National University)
  • 투고 : 2019.04.19
  • 심사 : 2019.05.24
  • 발행 : 2019.06.01
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

졸업 연구작품 제작에 참여한 학생들과 참여하지 않은 학생들에게서 인식되는 창의적 능력, 창의적 성격, 창의적 리더십 및 융합적 사고와 관련된 역량을 파악하였다. 창의적 능력에서는 참여 학과 학생들에게서 다양한 전공 분야의 이해를 통한 아이디어 창출에 대한 부분의 교육에 더 많은 교육과정과 비교과 활동의 운영이 필요하나 전체적으로는 비참여 학생보다는 높은 긍정적 결과를 얻었다. 창의적 리더십 및 융합적 사고에서는 종합설계와 졸업작품을 진행한 학생이 더 긍정적인 면을 보여주었으며 미참여 학과 학생들은 고등사고, 복잡한 현상의 논리적 분석 및 전체적 파악 등에서 창의적 역량이 부족함을 나타내었다.

We studied the perceived creative ability, convergent thinking and creative leadership related to converged capabilities among students who participated in the capstone design and graduation works and those who did not participate. In creative ability, students who participated capstone design and graduation works need more curriculum and non-curriculum activities for the idea generation through the understanding of various majors, but overall, they achieved higher positive results than the nonparticipating students. For creative leadership and convergent thinking, students with capstone design and graduation works showed a more positive capabilities, while students with nonparticipating students showed a slightly lack of creative thinking of higher order thinking, the logical analysis of complex phenomena, and overall understanding.

키워드

HSCGCO_2019_v11n1_9_f0001.png 이미지

그림 1. 대학생 핵심역량 [4] Fig. 1. Core competency of a university student.

HSCGCO_2019_v11n1_9_f0002.png 이미지

그림 2. 창의적 성격 비교 Fig. 2. Creative personality comparison.

HSCGCO_2019_v11n1_9_f0003.png 이미지

그림 3. 창의적 능력 비교 Fig. 3. Creative ability comparison.

HSCGCO_2019_v11n1_9_f0004.png 이미지

그림 4. 창의적 리더십 비교 Fig. 4. Creative leadership comparison.

HSCGCO_2019_v11n1_9_f0005.png 이미지

그림 5. 융합적 사고 비교 Fig. 5. Convergent thinking comparison.

HSCGCO_2019_v11n1_9_f0006.png 이미지

그림 6. 창의적 역량 Fig. 6. Creative Competence ability.

표 1. 학기별 수행 내용 Table 1. Performance plan for each grade level

HSCGCO_2019_v11n1_9_t0001.png 이미지

참고문헌

  1. H. J. Song, D. J. Shin, and C. J. Song, "Does an accredited engineering program contribute for training the creative talented engineers? based on students' experiences and learning performance," Journal of Governance Studies, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 95-116, 2015. https://doi.org/10.16973/jgs.2015.10.2.005
  2. E. Y. Chang and S. B. Yoon, "A study on the operating management method of capstone design and graduation portfolio using with the small drone or smartphone," Journal of Practical Engineering Education, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1-7, 2016. https://doi.org/10.14702/JPEE.2016.001
  3. Y. M. Jeon, "Effect analysis of learners' competence and class satisfaction by capstone design," Journal of the Korea Contents Association, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 601-610, 2018. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2018.18.03.601
  4. Ministry of Education, KRIVET, "K-CESA, Essential Skills diagnosis for the University Student," https://www.kcesa.re.kr/intro.do
  5. Y. M. Son, C. Y. Song, and H. J. Lee, "A study on the support for core competency of Korean student in collegiate level," Korea Research Institute for Vocational Education and Training, 2015.
  6. C. Y. Kim, "Development and validation of creativity confluence competency test for university students," Doctoral Thesis, Soongsil University, 2016.