The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education (한국간호교육학회지)

The Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education (한국간호교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Nursing Students' Peer Feedback Types and Emotional Response, Quality of Feedback, and Self-efficacy for Learning from Peer Feedback in Skill Training

술기 수행에서 간호대학생의 동료피드백 유형 및 동료피드백에 대한 정서반응, 피드백의 질, 학습자기효능감

  • Park, Young A (School of Nursing, Hallym University) ;
  • Kim, Eun Jung (School of Nursing.Research Institute of Nursing Science, Hallym University)
  • 박영아 (한림대학교 간호대학) ;
  • 김은정 (한림대학교 간호대학.한림대학교 간호학연구소)
  • Received : 2018.10.11
  • Accepted : 2019.03.11
  • Published : 2019.05.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: This study was conducted to identify types of peer feedback in nursing skills performance training and to investigate emotional response, perceived quality of feedback and self-efficacy for learning from peer feedback. Methods: A total of 110 second-year nursing students attending fundamentals of nursing classes at a university participated in 2017. Participants received peer feedback from one selected colleague who observed their skills performance, and completed a questionnaire. Contents of peer feedback video recordings were transcribed and classified into seven types of feedback. Data were analyzed using an independent t-test, ANOVA and Pearson correlation. Results: Participants mostly received feedback of 'correcting' and 'providing information.' Positive emotional responses from peer feedback were above medium, and negative emotional responses were low. The perceived quality of peer feedback was moderate and self-efficacy for learning was high. Quality of feedback correlated with negative emotional response (r=-.24, p=.014), and self-efficacy for learning (r=.35, p<.001). Self-efficacy for learning correlated with intimacy with peers (r=.24, p=.011) and positive emotional response (r=.21, p=.028). Conclusion: The results suggest that peer feedback in skill training could be used in terms of emotional response and self-efficacy for learning.

Keywords

Table 1. General Characteristics of Participants and Frequencies of Peer Feedback Provided

HGHOBN_2019_v25n2_186_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Frequencies by Types of Peer Feedback in Nursing Skill Performance

HGHOBN_2019_v25n2_186_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Emotional Response, Quality of Feedback and Self-efficacy for Learning after Receiving Peer Feedback

HGHOBN_2019_v25n2_186_t0003.png 이미지

Table 5. Correlations among Colleague Intimacy, Emotional Responses, Quality of feedback, and Self-efficacy for Learning

HGHOBN_2019_v25n2_186_t0004.png 이미지

Table 4. Association of General Characteristics and Emotional Response, Quality of Feedback, and Self-efficacy for Learning

HGHOBN_2019_v25n2_186_t0005.png 이미지

References

  1. Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (Eds.). (2007). Rethinking assessment in higher education, London: Routledge.
  2. Cheon, E. Y. (2013). The effects of video-aided peer feedback on enhancing nursing students' understanding of foley catheterization. The Journal of Korean Academic Society of Nursing Education, 19(1), 43-51. https://doi.org/10.5977/jkasne.2013.19.1.43
  3. Choi, E. J. (2015). Effects of positive and negative feedback sequence on work performance and emotional response (Unpublished master's thesis). The Graduate School of Chung Ang University, Seoul.
  4. Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Stuyven, K. (2010). Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(4), 304-315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.007
  5. Ilies, R., De Pater, I. E., & Judge, T. (2007). Differential affective reactions to negative and positive feedback, and the role of self-esteem. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(6), 590-609. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710778459
  6. Kannappan, A., Yip, D. T., Lodhia, N. A., Morton, J., & Lau, J. N. (2012). The effect of positive and negative verbal feedback on surgical skills performance and motivation. Journal of Surgical Education, 69(6), 798-801. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2012.05.012
  7. Kim, E. J. (2018). Effects of examiner's verbal feedback on nursing students' accuracy of self-assessment, emotional response, self-efficacy, and perceived quality of feedback in skill performance assessment. Journal of Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing, 25(2), 146-154. https://doi.org/10.7739/jkafn.2018.25.2.146
  8. Kim, M. J. (2011). Identifying types of peer feedback improving learners' ill-structured task performance & developing their instructional strategies. Korean Journal of Educational Methodology Studies, 23(4), 755-779. https://doi.org/10.17927/tkjems.2011.23.4.755
  9. Kim, S. H. (2014). A study on the feedback speech of prospective elementary school teachers. Journal of Speech Communication, 25, 415-437.
  10. Kim, Y. H. (2008). Satisfaction with evaluation method for fundamental nursing practical skill education through cell phone animation self-monitoring and feedback - Focus on foley catheterization -. Journal of the Korean Academy of Fundamentals of Nursing, 15(2), 134-142.
  11. Lee, C. D. (2008). A study on the ways of teacher's question and feedback in the classroom. The Journal of Korean Arts Education Research, 15, 177-216.
  12. Lee, H. Y. (2009). Investigating the structural relationship among learner's motivation, the quality of peer review, and performance in web-blended task-based learning. Journal of Korean Association for Educational Information and Media, 15(4), 129-147.
  13. Lee, K. A., Yoo, N. H., Lee, E. K., Chon, J. Y., & Lee, K. H. (2014). The relationship of academic personality types and major satisfaction on academic achievement related variables. The Korean Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy, 16(1), 107-121.
  14. Lee, S. G., & Shin, Y. H. (2016). Effects of self-directed feedback practice using smartphone videos on basic nursing skills, confidence in performance and learning satisfaction. Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 46(2), 283-292. https://doi.org/10.4040/jkan.2016.46.2.283
  15. Lee, Y. B. (2014). A study on aspects of college student writer's acceptance of peer feedback - Focused on aspects of writer's response on peer feedback and reflection on revised draft. Research on Writing, 21, 201-234.
  16. Lee, Y. B. (2016). Aspects and effects of peer feedback activities by the difference of peer group members writing levels. Korean Language Education Research, 154, 127-164.
  17. Lee, Y. J. (2012). Improving pre-service teachers' instructional design skills through peer feedback: Writing lesson plans with ASSURE model. Journal of Educational Technology, 28(4), 687-706. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.28.4.687
  18. Lee, Y. J. (2015). Analysis of types of peer feedback affecting students' perceived usefulness of feedback, feedback acceptance, and task performance in instructional blog environments. The Journal of Educational Information and Media, 21(2), 245-264.
  19. Liaison Committee on Medical Education. (2016, December 14). Functions and structure of medical school: Standards of accreditation of medical education program leading to the MD degree. Retrieved from https://med.virginia.edu/ume-curriculum/wp-content/uploads/sites/216/2016/07/2017-18_Functions-and-Structure_2016-03-24.pdf
  20. Lim, K. Y., Kim, Y. J., Jin, M. H., & Kim, J. Y. (2017). Exploring the effectiveness of peer feedback in problem-solving: Mediating effects of feedback acceptance. Journal of Educational Technology, 33(2), 269-294. https://doi.org/10.17232/KSET.33.2.269
  21. Park, I. H., & Shin, S. J. (2015). The effects of video-based peer assisted learning in standardized patients simulation: Pre and post operative care. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing, 27(1), 73-82. https://doi.org/10.7475/kjan.2015.27.1.73
  22. Park, S. Y., & Kweon, Y. R. (2012). The effect of using standardized patients in psychiatric nursing practical training for nursing college students. Journal of Korean Academy of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, 21(1), 79-88. https://doi.org/10.12934/jkpmhn.2012.21.1.79
  23. Plakht, Y., Shiyovich, A., Nusbaum, L., & Raizer, H. (2013). The association of positive and negative feedback with clinical performance, self-evaluation and practice contribution of nursing students. Nurse Education Today, 33(10), 1264-1268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2012.07.017
  24. Seo, Y. J., & Jeon, E. J. (2012). A study of peer feedback opinion validity by types in writing. Korean Language Education Research, 44, 369-395.
  25. Sung, J. H., & Jung, Y. S. (2014). Study of peer talk in peer feedback: In writing lesson plans. Journal of Learner-Centered Curriculum and Instruction, 14(11), 419-448.
  26. Thomas, J. D., & Arnold, R. M. (2011). Giving feedback. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 14(2), 233-239. https://doi.org/10.1089/jpm.2010.0093
  27. Van-Dijk, D., & Kluger, A. N. (2004). Feedback sign effect on motivation: Is it moderated by regulatory focus?. Applied Psychology, 53(1), 113-135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2004.00163.x
  28. Vanyolos, E., Furka, I., Miko, I., Viszlai, A., Nemeth, N., & Peto, K. (2017). How does practice improve the skills of medical students during consecutive training courses?. Acta Cirurgica Brasileira, 32(6), 491-502. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0102-865020170060000010
  29. Wilkins, E. A., Shin, E., & Ainsworth, J. (2009). The effects of peer feedback practices with elementary education teacher candidates. Teacher Education Quarterly, 36(2), 79-93.
  30. Yang, K. H., & Wu, Y. H. (2013). Effects of feedback types on the student's self-efficacy. International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning, 3(3), 202-205.

Cited by

  1. 표준화 환자 시뮬레이션 실습교육기반의 간호교육에서 사전브리핑을 활용한 팀 기반 학습 효과 vol.18, pp.8, 2019, https://doi.org/10.14400/jdc.2020.18.8.271