DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Study on Peel Strength Measurement of 3D Printing Composite Fabric by Using FDM

FDM 방식을 활용한 3D 프린팅 복합직물의 박리강력 측정 연구

  • Han, Yoojung (Dept. of Fashion Industry, Ewha Womans University) ;
  • Kim, Jongjun (Dept. of Fashion Industry, Ewha Womans University)
  • 한유정 (이화여자대학교 의류산업학과) ;
  • 김종준 (이화여자대학교 의류산업학과)
  • Received : 2019.01.31
  • Accepted : 2019.05.21
  • Published : 2019.05.30

Abstract

One way of appling 3D printing to garments is through the combination of 3D polymer filaments in textile fabrics. it is essential to understand the interface between the polymer and the 3D composite fabric in order to enhance the adhesion strength between the polymers and the peeling strength between the fabric and the polymer. In this study, the adhesion of composite printed specimens using a combination of fabric and polymers for 3D printing was investigated, and also the change in adhesion was investigated after the composite fabric printed with polymers was subjected to constant pressure. Through this process, the aims to help develop and utilize 3D printing textures by providing basic data to enhance durability of 3D printing composite fabrics. The measure of the peeling strength of the composite fabric prepared by printing on a fabric using PLA, TPU, Nylon polymer was obtained as follows; TPU polymer for 3D printing showed significantly higher peel strength than polymers of composite fabric using PLA and Nylon polymer. In the case of TPU polymer, the adhesive was crosslinked because of the reaction between polyurethane and water on the surface of the fabric, thus increasing the adhesion. It could be observed that the adhesion between the polymer and the fiber is determined more by the mechanical effect rather than by its chemical composition. To achieve efficient bonding of the fibers, it is possible to modify the fiber surface mechanically and chemically, and consider the deposition process in terms of temperature, pressure and build density.

Keywords

HGPSBI_2019_v23n2_77_f0001.png 이미지

Figure 1. Schematic Illustration of Printing/Cutting Pattern for Peel Test Samples Formation

HGPSBI_2019_v23n2_77_f0002.png 이미지

Figure 2 . Actual Sample of 3D Polymer Composite Fabric Printed on Fabric

HGPSBI_2019_v23n2_77_f0003.png 이미지

Figure 3. Photograph of a Tensile Tester with 180° Delamination Sample in Place

HGPSBI_2019_v23n2_77_f0004.png 이미지

Figure 5. State of TPU Polymer Infiltrated into Fabric

HGPSBI_2019_v23n2_77_f0005.png 이미지

Figure 6. Adhesion Force of Woven Fabrics according to Polymer Type (kgf)

HGPSBI_2019_v23n2_77_f0006.png 이미지

Figure 7. Chemical Composition of Silk

HGPSBI_2019_v23n2_77_f0007.png 이미지

Figure 8. Chemical Composition of Polyurethane

HGPSBI_2019_v23n2_77_f0008.png 이미지

Figure 9. Peel Strength of 3D Printing Composite Fabric according to Heat Treatment, Cotton 30’s Fabric

HGPSBI_2019_v23n2_77_f0009.png 이미지

Figure 10. Peel Strength of 3D Printing Composite Fabric based on Heat Treatment, Nylon Fabric

Table 1. Properties of the Applied Woven Textiles

HGPSBI_2019_v23n2_77_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Image of the Woven Fabric

HGPSBI_2019_v23n2_77_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Filament Properties

HGPSBI_2019_v23n2_77_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. 3D Printing Conditions with Various Filaments

HGPSBI_2019_v23n2_77_t0004.png 이미지

Figure 4. Highest 10 Peak Load Circles in a Displacement Load Curve

HGPSBI_2019_v23n2_77_t0005.png 이미지

Table 5. Maximum Adhesion Forces Fmax of FDM Prints on Different Woven Fabrics

HGPSBI_2019_v23n2_77_t0006.png 이미지

Table 6. Weight and Thickness of 3D Polymer Composite Fabric by Heat Treatment

HGPSBI_2019_v23n2_77_t0007.png 이미지

References

  1. Bingham, G. A., Hague, R. J., Tuck, C. J., Long, A. C., Crookston, J. J., & Sherburn, M. N. (2007). Rapid manufactured textiles. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 20(1), 96-105. doi:10.1080/09511920600690434
  2. Brinks, G. J., & Warmoeskerken, M. M. C. G. (2013). The added value of 3D polymer deposition on textiles. 13th AUTEX World TextileConference, Dresden, 22-24 May.
  3. Yim, B. S. (2013), A study on interconnection properties of carbon nanotube-filled solderable electrically conductive adhesives (ECAs) (Unpublished doctoral di ssertation). Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Korea.
  4. Han, Y., & Kim, J. (2018). A study on the mechanical properties of knit fabric using 3D printing - Focused on PLA, TPU 3D filament -. Journal of Fashion Business, 22(4), 93-105. doi:10.12940/jfb.2018.22.4.39
  5. Kim, M. J., Kim, S. Y., Kim, H. J., Kim, H. L., & Lee, S. H. (2017). Analysis of physical properties of 3D textiles by 3D printing output condition and heat treatment process. Proceedings of the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles Fall Conference, (p. 107). Seoul: the Korean Society of Clothing and Textiles .
  6. Korger, M., Bergschneider, J., Lutz, M., Mahltig, B., Finsterbusch, K., & Rabe, M. (2016, July). Possible applications of 3D printing technology on textile substrates. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 141(1) 012011. IOP Publishing. doi:10.1088/1757-899X/141/1/012011
  7. Lee, S. (2018). Evaluation of mechanical properties and washability of 3D printed lace/voil composite fabrics manufactured by FDM 3D printing technology. Fashion & Textile Research Journal. 20(3), 353-359. doi:10.5805/SFTI.2018.20.3.353
  8. Malengier, B., Hertleer, C., Van Langenhove, L., & Cardon, L. (2017). 3D printing on textiles: testing of adhesion. Proceeding of International Conference on Intelligent Textiles and Mass Customisation, (pp. 1-6). Gent: J Fashion Technol Textile Eng.
  9. Nam, J., & Shin, B., (1998). Silk science. Seoul: Seoul National University Publishing Council
  10. Narula, A., Pastore, C. M., Schmelzeisen, D., El Basri, S., Schenk, J., & Shajoo, S. (2018). Effect of knit and print parameters on peel strength of hybrid 3-D printed textiles. Journal of Textiles and Fibrous Materials, 1(1), 1-10. doi:10.1177/2515221117749251
  11. Pei, E., Shen, J., & Watling, J. (2015). Direct 3D printing of polymers onto textiles: experimental studies and applications. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 21(5), 556-571. doi:10.1108/RPJ-09-2014-0126
  12. Ryu, K. J., & Park, C. Y. (2014). Synthesis and properties of eco-friendly polyurethane adhesive without wolvent: Effect of DPE-41, TDI, Initiator and Plasticizer content. Journal of Environmental Science International, 23(11), 1909-1918. doi:10.5322/JESI.2014.23.11.1909
  13. Sabantina, L., Kinzel, F., Ehrmann, A., & Finsterbusch, K. (2015). Combining 3D printed forms with textile structures-mechanical and geometrical properties of multi-material systems. IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 87(1). 012005. IOP Publishing. doi:10.1088/1757-899X/87/1/012005
  14. Sanatgar, R. H., Campagne, C., & Nierstrasz, V. (2017). Investigation of the adhesion properties of direct 3D printing of polymers and nanocomposites on textiles: Effect of FDM printing process parameters. Applied Surface Science, 403, 551-563. doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.01.112
  15. Singha, S. (2012). A review on coating & lamination in textiles: processes and applications, American Journal of Polymer Science, 2(3), pp. 39-49. doi: 10.5923/j.ajps.20120203.04