Journal of Periodontal and Implant Science

Korean Academy of Periodontology (대한치주과학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Application of low-crystalline carbonate apatite granules in 2-stage sinus floor augmentation: a prospective clinical trial and histomorphometric evaluation

  • Nakagawa, Takayuki (Department of Oral Surgery, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School) ;
  • Kudoh, Keiko (Department of Oral Surgery, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School) ;
  • Fukuda, Naoyuki (Department of Oral Surgery, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School) ;
  • Kasugai, Shohei (Dental Implant Clinic, Dental Hospital, Tokyo Medical and Dental University) ;
  • Tachikawa, Noriko (Dental Implant Clinic, Dental Hospital, Tokyo Medical and Dental University) ;
  • Koyano, Kiyoshi (Regenerative Dentistry and Implant Center, Kyushu University Hospital, Kyushu University) ;
  • Matsushita, Yasuyuki (Regenerative Dentistry and Implant Center, Kyushu University Hospital, Kyushu University) ;
  • Sasaki, Masanori (Regenerative Dentistry and Implant Center, Kyushu University Hospital, Kyushu University) ;
  • Ishikawa, Kunio (Department of Biomaterials, Kyushu University Faculty of Dental Science) ;
  • Miyamoto, Youji (Department of Oral Surgery, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Tokushima University Graduate School)
  • Received : 2019.07.02
  • Accepted : 2019.08.28
  • Published : 2019.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to elucidate the efficacy and safety of carbonate apatite (CO3Ap) granules in 2-stage sinus floor augmentation through the radiographic and histomorphometric assessment of bone biopsy specimens. Methods: Two-stage sinus floor augmentation was performed on 13 patients with a total of 17 implants. Radiographic assessment using panoramic radiographs was performed immediately after augmentation and was also performed 2 additional times, at 7±2 months and 18±2 months post-augmentation, respectively. Bone biopsy specimens taken from planned implant placement sites underwent micro-computed tomography, after which histological sections were prepared. Results: Postoperative healing of the sinus floor augmentation was uneventful in all cases. The mean preoperative residual bone height was 3.5±1.3 mm, and this was increased to 13.3±1.7 mm by augmentation with the CO3Ap granules. The mean height of the augmented site had decreased to 10.7±1.9 mm by 7±2 months after augmentation; however, implants with lengths in the range of 6.5 to 11.5 mm could still be placed. The mean height of the augmented site had decreased to 9.6±1.4 mm by 18±2 months post-augmentation. No implant failure or complications were observed. Few inflammatory cells or foreign body giant cells were observed in the bone biopsy specimens. Although there were individual differences in the amount of new bone detected, new bone was observed to be in direct contact with the CO3Ap granules in all cases, without an intermediate layer of fibrous tissue. The amounts of bone and residual CO3Ap were 33.8%±15.1% and 15.3%±11.9%, respectively. Conclusions: In this first demonstration, low-crystalline CO3Ap granules showed excellent biocompatibility, and bone biopsy showed them to be replaced with bone in humans. CO3Ap granules are a useful and safe bone substitute for two-stage sinus floor augmentation.

Keywords

References

  1. Donath K, Rohrer MD, Beck-Mannagetta J. A histologic evaluation of a mandibular cross section one year after augmentation with hydroxyapatite particles. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1987;63:651-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/0030-4220(87)90362-8
  2. Bauer TW, Muschler GF. Bone graft materials. An overview of the basic science. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000;371:10-27. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200002000-00003
  3. Moore WR, Graves SE, Bain GI. Synthetic bone graft substitutes. ANZ J Surg 2001;71:354-61. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1622.2001.02128.x
  4. Bohner M, Galea L, Doebelin N. Calcium phosphate bone graft substitutes: Failures and hopes. J Eur Ceram Soc 2012;32:2663-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.02.028
  5. Ishikawa K. Bone substitute fabrication based on dissolution-precipitation reactions. Materials (Basel) 2010;3:1138-55. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma3021138
  6. LeGelos RZ. Calcium phosphates in oral biology and medicine. Monogr Oral Sci 1991;15:1-201. https://doi.org/10.1159/000419232
  7. Kanayama K, Sriarj W, Shimokawa H, Ohya K, Doi Y, Shibutani T. Osteoclast and osteoblast activities on carbonate apatite plates in cell cultures. J Biomater Appl 2011;26:435-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885328210374672
  8. Ellies LG, Nelson DG, Featherstone JD. Crystallographic structure and surface morphology of sintered carbonated apatites. J Biomed Mater Res 1988;22:541-53. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbm.820220609
  9. Doi Y, Shibutani T, Moriwaki Y, Kajimoto T, Iwayama Y. Sintered carbonate apatites as bioresorbable bone substitutes. J Biomed Mater Res 1998;39:603-10. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19980315)39:4<603::AID-JBM15>3.0.CO;2-7
  10. Ishikawa K, Matsuya S, Lin X, Lei Z, Yuasa T, Miyamoto Y. Fabrication of low crystalline B-type carbonate apatite block from low crystalline calcite block. J Ceram Soc Jpn 2010;118:341-4. https://doi.org/10.2109/jcersj2.118.341
  11. Nagai H, Kobayashi-Fujioka M, Fujisawa K, Ohe G, Takamaru N, Hara K, et al. Effects of low crystalline carbonate apatite on proliferation and osteoblastic differentiation of human bone marrow cells. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2015;26:99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-015-5431-5
  12. Fujisawa K, Akita K, Fukuda N, Kamada K, Kudoh T, Ohe G, et al. Compositional and histological comparison of carbonate apatite fabricated by dissolution-precipitation reaction and $Bio-Oss^{(R)}$. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2018;29:121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-018-6129-2
  13. Kudoh K, Fukuda N, Kasugai S, Tachikawa N, Koyano K, Matsushita Y, et al. Maxillary sinus floor augmentation using low crystalline carbonate apatite granules with simultaneous implant installation: first-in-human clinical trial. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2019;77:985.e1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2018.11.026
  14. Lin X, Matsuya S, Nakagawa M, Terada Y, Ishikawa K. Effect of molding pressure on fabrication of low-crystalline calcite block. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2008;19:479-84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10856-006-0028-7
  15. Troedhan A, Schlichting I, Kurrek A, Wainwright M. Primary implant stability in augmented sinuslift-sites after completed bone regeneration: a randomized controlled clinical study comparing four subantrally inserted biomaterials. Sci Rep 2014;4:5877. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep05877
  16. Alsaadi G, Quirynen M, Michiels K, Jacobs R, van Steenberghe D. A biomechanical assessment of the relation between the oral implant stability at insertion and subjective bone quality assessment. J Clin Periodontol 2007;34:359-66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-051X.2007.01047.x
  17. Johansson B, Back T, Hirsch JM. Cutting torque measurements in conjunction with implant placement in grafted and nongrafted maxillas as an objective evaluation of bone density: a possible method for identifying early implant failures? Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2004;6:9-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2004.tb00022.x
  18. Dos Anjos TL, de Molon RS, Paim PR, Marcantonio E, Marcantonio E Jr, Faeda RS. Implant stability after sinus floor augmentation with deproteinized bovine bone mineral particles of different sizes: a prospective, randomized and controlled split-mouth clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2016;45:1556-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2016.09.004
  19. O'Sullivan D, Sennerby L, Meredith N. Measurements comparing the initial stability of five designs of dental implants: a human cadaver study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000;2:85-92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2000.tb00110.x
  20. Tabassum A, Meijer GJ, Walboomers XF, Jansen JA. Evaluation of primary and secondary stability of titanium implants using different surgical techniques. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:487-92.
  21. Deppe H, Mucke T, Wagenpfeil S, Holzle F. Sinus augmentation with intra- vs extraorally harvested bone grafts for the provision of dental implants: clinical long-term results. Quintessence Int 2012;43:469-81.
  22. Kim YK, Yun PY, Kim SG, Kim BS, Ong JL. Evaluation of sinus bone resorption and marginal bone loss after sinus bone grafting and implant placement. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009;107:e21-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.02.009
  23. Hieu PD, Chung JH, Yim SB, Hong KS. A radiographical study on the changes in height of grafting materials after sinus lift: a comparison between two types of xenogenic materials. J Periodontal Implant Sci 2010;40:25-32. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2010.40.1.25
  24. Zerbo IR, Zijderveld SA, de Boer A, Bronckers AL, de Lange G, ten Bruggenkate CM, et al. Histomorphometry of human sinus floor augmentation using a porous beta-tricalcium phosphate: a prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res 2004;15:724-32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01055.x
  25. John HD, Wenz B. Histomorphometric analysis of natural bone mineral for maxillary sinus augmentation. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:199-207.
  26. Sartori S, Silvestri M, Forni F, Icaro Cornaglia A, Tesei P, Cattaneo V. Ten-year follow-up in a maxillary sinus augmentation using anorganic bovine bone (Bio-Oss). A case report with histomorphometric evaluation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003;14:369-72. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0501.2003.140316.x
  27. Tadjoedin ES, de Lange GL, Bronckers AL, Lyaruu DM, Burger EH. Deproteinized cancellous bovine bone (Bio-Oss) as bone substitute for sinus floor elevation. A retrospective, histomorphometrical study of five cases. J Clin Periodontol 2003;30:261-70. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-051X.2003.01099.x
  28. Hallman M, Sennerby L, Lundgren S. A clinical and histologic evaluation of implant integration in the posterior maxilla after sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone, bovine hydroxyapatite, or a 20:80 mixture. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002;17:635-43.
  29. Galindo-Moreno P, Moreno-Riestra I, Avila G, Fernandez-Barbero JE, Mesa F, Aguilar M, et al. Histomorphometric comparison of maxillary pristine bone and composite bone graft biopsies obtained after sinus augmentation. Clin Oral Implants Res 2010;21:122-8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01814.x
  30. Moy PK, Lundgren S, Holmes RE. Maxillary sinus augmentation: histomorphometric analysis of graft materials for maxillary sinus floor augmentation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993;51:857-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0278-2391(10)80103-X
  31. Kim Y, Nowzari H, Rich SK. Risk of prion disease transmission through bovine-derived bone substitutes: a systematic review. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2013;15:645-53. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1708-8208.2011.00407.x

Cited by

  1. Fabrication and Histological Evaluation of a Fully Interconnected Porous CO3Ap Block Formed by Hydrate Expansion of CaO Granules vol.3, pp.12, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.0c01176
  2. Carbonate apatite artificial bone vol.22, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1080/14686996.2021.1947120
  3. Bioactivity Evaluation of Biphasic Hydroxyapatite Bone Substitutes Immersed and Grown with Supersaturated Calcium Phosphate Solution vol.14, pp.18, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14185143
  4. Staged Sinus Floor Elevation Using Novel Low-Crystalline Carbonate Apatite Granules: Prospective Results after 3-Year Functional Loading vol.14, pp.19, 2019, https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14195760
  5. Improved In Vivo Delivery of Small RNA Based on the Calcium Phosphate Method vol.11, pp.11, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11111160
  6. Alveolar ridge preservation in beagle dogs using carbonate apatite bone substitute vol.48, pp.2, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.09.260