디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제17권4호
  • /
  • Pages.299-307
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

3D 가상현실을 이용한 디지털 사이니지의 실재감과 상호작용성이 브랜드 경험과 태도에 미치는 효과

The Effect of Presence and Interactivity of Digital Signage Using 3D Virtual Reality on Brand Experience and Attitude

  • 한광석 (남서울대학교 광고홍보학과)
  • Han, Kwang-Seok (Division of Advertising and Public Relations, Namseoul University)
  • 투고 : 2019.01.31
  • 심사 : 2019.04.20
  • 발행 : 2019.04.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 3D 가상현실(Virtual Reality) 기술을 활용하여 디지털 사이니지 광고를 경험하고 이를 통한 실재감과 상호작용성이 브랜드 경험과 디지털 사이니지 태도에 어떠한 차이가 나타나는지를 실험을 통해 규명하였다. 인지적 실재감, 감성적 실재감, 미디어 실재감과 상호작용성 수준(고 vs. 저)을 독립변인으로 하고 브랜드 경험과 태도를 종속 변인으로 하는 Two-Way MANOVA분석을 실시하였다. 연구결과, 첫째, 인지적 실재감은 상호작용성이 낮은 경우 행동적 경험을 통해 가장 효과적으로 형성되는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, 감성적 실재감 역시 상호작용성 수준이 낮은 경우 감성적 경험에 긍정적인 영향을 주는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, 미디어 실재감은 상호작용성 수준이 낮으면 감성적 경험에 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 디지털 기술을 이용할 경우 적절한 수준의 상호작용성 수준을 통해 미디어 전략과 기술의 특성에 따른 실재감을 전달하는 커뮤니케이션 전략이 요구된다. 향후 연구에서는 상호작용성 수준에 있어 양적 차원이 아닌 질적 차원에서의 접근이 필요하다.

In this study, we experimented with experience of digital signage using Virtual Reality technology, and the difference between presence and interactivity in brand experience and digital signage attitude. We conducted a two-way MANOVA analysis with cognitive presence, emotional presence, and media presence as the independent variable and interactivity level(high vs low) as dependent variables and the brand experience and attitude as dependent variables. First, cognitive presence was found to be most effective through behavioral experience when low interactivity. Second, emotional presence also has a positive effect on emotional experience when the level of interactivity is low. Third, media presence has a positive effect on emotional experience if the level of interactivity is low. This study suggests a communication strategy to communicate presence according to the characteristics of media strategy and technology through appropriate level of interactivity when using digital technology. Future research requires a qualitative approach rather than a quantitative one in terms of interactivity.

키워드

DJTJBT_2019_v17n4_299_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Research Model

Table 1. Result of MANOVA & ANOVA

DJTJBT_2019_v17n4_299_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Result of Hypothesis

DJTJBT_2019_v17n4_299_t0002.png 이미지

참고문헌

  1. J. S. Park, S. C. Park & H. Y. Kim. (2012). Concept and Forecast of Digital Signage, Korean Institute of Communication Sciences Conference, (pp. 619-620). Seoul : KICS.
  2. H. J. Gong. (2018). A Preliminary study on the Direction of Design and Designer in the Era of 4th Industrial Revolution, Journal of Digital Convergence, 16(4), 307-312. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2018.16.4.307
  3. S. W. Shim. (2010). The Study on Consumer's Attitude and Use toward Media Pole at Kang-Nam Area, Journal of Outdoor Advertising Research, 7(4), 187-211
  4. S. G. Min & S. H. Kim. (2014). Study on Utilization of Digital Signage Advertisements as an Experience Marketing Technique, KODDCO 2014 Conference, (365-366). Seoul : KODDCO.
  5. A. Yarramreddy, P. Gromkowski & I. Baggili. (2018). Forensic Analysis of Immersive Virtual Reality Social Applications: A Primary Accout, 2018 IEEE Security and Privacy Workshops, (pp. 186-196). San Francisco : IEEE.
  6. Y. J. Lee & J. S. Kang. (2018). Flexible Display Interface Design for User Experience, Journal of Digital Convergence, 16(1), 287-292. DOI : 10.14400/JDC.2018.16.1.287
  7. T. Y. Chun & N. H. Park. (2015). The Effect of Augmented Reality Traits on Presence, Flow, and Relational Continuance Behavior with Smart-Phones, Journal of Distribution Science, 13(5), 45-52. https://doi.org/10.15722/jds.13.5.201505.45
  8. B. Reeves & C. Nass. (1996). The Media Equation: How People Treat Computers, Television and New Media Like Real People and Places, New York: Cambridge University Press.
  9. D. R. Garrison. (2007). Online Communication of Inquiry Review: Social, Cognitive, and Teaching Presence issues, Paper Presented at the Sloan-C Summer Workshop, (pp. 61-72). Baltimore : MD.
  10. D. R. Garrison, T. Anderson & W. Archer. (2000). Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education, The Internet and Higher Education, 2(23), 87-105.
  11. M. Kang & M. Wang. (2005). Cybergogy for Engaged Learning: A Framework for Creating Learner Engagement through Information and Communication Technology. Engaged Learning with Emerging Technologies. New York: Springer
  12. S. Y. Kim. (2008). Investigating the Relationship among Emotional Presence, Emotional Intelligence, e-Learning self-efficacy, Achievement, and Satisfaction in an e-Learning Environment. Master dissertation. The Graduate School of Ewha Womans University, Seoul.
  13. M. Lombard, R. D. Recih, M. E. Bracken & R. B. Dittion. (2000). Presnece and Televsion: The Role of Screen Size, Human Communication Research, 26(1), 75-98. https://doi.org/10.1093/hcr/26.1.75
  14. J. D. Ivory & S. Kalyanaraman. (2007). The Effects of Technological Advancement and Violent Content in Video Games on Players' Feelings of Presence, Involvement, Physiological Arousal, and Aggression, Journal of Communication, 57(3), 532-555. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2007.00356.x
  15. S. J. MacMillan & J. S. Hwang. (2003). Measures of Perceived Interactivity: An Exploration of the Role of Direction of Communication, User Control, and Time in Shaping Perceptions of Interactivity. Journal of Advertising, 31(3), 29-42.
  16. J. Jee & J. S. Hwang. (2002). Measures of Perceived Interactivity: An Exploration of the Role of Direction of Communication, User Control, and Time in Shaping Perceptions of Interactivity. Journal of Interactivity Advertising, 31(3), 29-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2002.10673674
  17. I. K. Shin & S. W. Shim. (2011). The Study on Interactive Outdoor Advertising Acceptace : Digital Signage Stikus Wall Case. The Korean Journal of Advertising and Public Relations, 13(4), 390-432.
  18. K. S. Han, H. K. Chin & T. J. Lee. (2013). Influence of Engagement and Interactivity Level on Accessibility and Diagnosticity in Smart Signage. International Journal of Digital Content Technology and its Applications, 7(11), 19-325.
  19. Caru & Cova. (2003). Revisiting Consumption Experience a More Humble but Complete View of the Concept. Marketing Theory, 3(2), 267-286. https://doi.org/10.1177/14705931030032004
  20. B. Schmit. (1999). Experiential Marketing: How to Get Customers to Sense, Feel, Think, Act and Relate to Your Company and Brands. The Free Press.
  21. K. S. Han. (2013). Digital Signage, Brand Experience, Simple Touch Type of Digital Signage, Interactive Type of Digital Signage. Advertising Research, 98, 43-84.