디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제17권4호
  • /
  • Pages.87-94
  • /
  • 2019
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

조직 내 컴페션 행동을 통한 기업의 사회적 책임

Building CSR through Organizational Acts of Compassion

  • 투고 : 2019.01.16
  • 심사 : 2019.04.20
  • 발행 : 2019.04.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

본 연구는 조직 내 개인들의 컴페션 행동들이 조직 수준의 기업의 사회적 책임(CSR)에 어떻게 영향을 미치는가에 대한 이론적 모델을 세웠다. 이론적 모델은 다른 직원의 고통에 반응하여 제공하는 직원들의 컴페션 행위가 조직의 긍정적 또는 부정적 조직 정체성을 일으키고, 더 나아가서 기업의 CSR 활동에 영향을 미칠 것으로 개념화했다. 즉, 조직 구성원들의 가슴에서 일어나는 진실한 컴페션은 긍정적 조직 정체성을 일으켜 자발적인 CSR을 하게 되고, 외부의 압력 등에 의해서 어쩔 수 없이 하게 되는 가짜 컴페션은 부정적 조직 정체성을 일으켜 소극적인 CSR을 하게 된다. 본 연구는 CSR의 선행변수로써 조직 내 개인들의 컴페션 행위와 이를 통해 발전한 조직의 정체성으로 보았다.

Our study builds up a theoretical model to explain how individual compassion in organizations affects the macro concept of corporate social responsibility (CSR). A theoretical framework conceptualizes whereby individual compassions in work organizations responding to others' suffering generate positive or negative organizational identity, which impact their CSR activities. That is, we proposes that authentic compassion will develop positive organizational identity and then leads to proactive CSR, while pseudo compassion will trigger negative organizational identity and in turn results in reactive CSR. This study aims to explain the antecedents of firms' CSR in terms of individual compassion in organizations, interacted with the dynamics of organizational identity.

키워드

DJTJBT_2019_v17n4_87_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Research Model

DJTJBT_2019_v17n4_87_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. Research Model

참고문헌

  1. R. V. Aguilera, D. E. Rupp, C. A. Williams & J. Ganapathi. (2007). A multi level theory of social change in organization. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 836-863. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275678
  2. J. M. Kanov, S. Maitlis, M. C. Worline, J. E. Dutton, P. J. Frost & J. M. Lilius. (2004). Compassion in organizational life. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(6), 808-827. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764203260211
  3. J. E. Dutton, M. C. Worline, P. J. Frost & J. M. Lilius. (2006). Explaining compassion organizing. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51(1), 59-96. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.51.1.59
  4. J. E. Dutton, P. J. Frost, M. C. Worline, J. M. Lilius & J. M. Kanov. (2002). Leading in times of trauma. Harvard Business Review, 80(1), 54-61.
  5. P. J. Frost, J. E. Dutton, S. Maitlis, J. M. Lilius, J. M. Kanov & M. C. Worline. (2006). Seeing organizations differently: Three lenses on compassion. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. Lawrence & W. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of Organization Studies, London: Sage Publications, forthcoming.
  6. K. J. Gergen. (1998). From Control to Construction : New Narratives for the Social Sciences. Psychological Inquiry, 9(2), 101-103. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0902_4
  7. J. Bednar, B. Owens, J. E. Dutton & L. M. Roberts. (2011). Finding the positive in individual's identities: An investigation of the reliability and validity of a six different measures of positive organizational identity[Working papers].
  8. P. J. Frost. (2003). Toxic emotions at work: How compassionate managers handle pain and conflict. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
  9. J. M. Lilius, M. C. Worline, S. Maitlis, J. Kanov, J. E. Dutton & P. Frost. (2008). The contours and consequences of compassion at work, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(2), 193-218. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.508
  10. J. E. Dutton, L. M. Roberts & J. Bednar. (2010). Pathways for positive identity construction at work: Four types of positive identity and the building of social resources, Academy of Management Review, 35(2), 265-293. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2010.48463334
  11. B. E. Ashforth & F. A. Mael. (1996). Organizational identity and strategy as a context for the individual. Advances in Strategic Management, 13, 19-64.
  12. F. A. Mael & B. E. Ashforth. (1992). Alumni and Their Alma Mater: A Partial Test of the Reformulated Model of Organizational Identification, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13(2), 103-123. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030130202
  13. N. Ellemers, D. De Gilde & S. A. Haslam. (2004). Motivating individuals and groups at work: A social identity perspective on leadership and performance. Academy of Management Review, 29, 459-478. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2004.13670967
  14. D. B. Turban & D. W. Greening. (1996). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Review, 40(3), 658-672.
  15. J. E. Dutton, J. M. Dukerich & C. V. Harquail. (1994). Organizational images and member identification. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 239-263. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393235
  16. B. H. Stamm. (2002). Measuring compassion satisfaction as well as fatigue: Developmental history of the compassion satisfaction and fatigue test. In C. R. Figley (Ed.), Treating compassion fatigue (pp. 107-119). New York: Brunner-Routledge.
  17. A. M. Grant. (2008). Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 48-58. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.48
  18. A. M. Grant, J. E. Dutton & B. Rosso. (2008). Giving commitment: Employee support programs and the prosocial sensemaking process. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 898-918. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2008.34789652
  19. J. E. Dutton, J. M. Lilius & J. M. Kanov. (2007). The transformative potential of compassion at work. In D. Cooperrider, R. Fry and S. Piderit, (Eds.), Handbook of Transformative Cooperation: New Designs and Dynamics (pp. 107-126). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
  20. P. S. Ellen, J. W. Deborah & A. M. Lois. (2006). Building corporate associations: consumer attributions for corporate social responsibility programs. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 147-157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070305284976
  21. M. Orlitzky, F. L. Schmidt & S. L. Rynes. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24. 403-441. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840603024003910
  22. H. Tajfel & J. C. Turner. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (2nd ed.): 7-24. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
  23. S. Albert & W. D. Whetten. (1985). Organizational identity. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 263-295.
  24. J. E. Dutton & J. M. Dukerich. (1991). Keeping an eye on the mirror: Image and identity in organizational adaptation. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 517-554. https://doi.org/10.2307/256405
  25. R. Cropanzano, Z. S. Byrne, D. R. Bobocel & D. E. Rupp. (2001). Moral virtues, fairness heuristics, social entities, and other denizens of organizational justice. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 58(2), 164-209. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1791
  26. H. Weiss & R. Cropanzano. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. In B. Staw & L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
  27. A. B. Carroll. (1979). A Three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate Performance. Academy of Management Review, 4, 497-505. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1979.4498296
  28. S. H. Ko. (2018). The Effects of Compassion experienced by defectors on Job Performance and organizational citizenship behavior : Mediating Effect of Deep Acting. Journal of Digital Convergence, 16(11), 177-183. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2018.16.11.177
  29. D. R. Hwang, S. H. Lee & H. O. Do. (2016). Convergence generation the corporate research activities on the impact of CSR on purchase : Focusing on the mediating effect of the image and reputation. Journal of Digital Convergence, 14(3), 127-134. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2016.14.3.127
  30. J. S. Yoon & J. H. Lee. (2018). A Case Study on Corporate Social Responsibility(CSR) of Domestic Cosmetics Companies. Journal of Convergence for Information Technology, 8(5), 219-228.
  31. S. W. Nam & J. W. Yang. (2017). A Study on the Difference of SME's CSR Effects Using the Multi-Group Analysis. Journal of Convergence for Information Technology, 7(6), 253-258. https://doi.org/10.22156/CS4SMB.2017.7.6.253