DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on Comparing and Analyzing Seismic Retrofit Method Guideline of the Existing Education Facilities between South-Korea and Overseas

국내외 교육시설물 내진보강공법에 대한 가이드라인 비교 분석 연구

  • Na, Young-Ju (Department of Architectural Engineering, U1 University) ;
  • Ha, Sun-Geun (School of Architectural Engineering, University of Ulsan) ;
  • Son, Seung-Hyun (Department of Architectural Engineering, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • Son, Ki-Young (School of Architectural Engineering, University of Ulsan) ;
  • Lee, Joo-hyeong (School of Architectural Engineering, University of Ulsan)
  • Received : 2018.11.02
  • Accepted : 2019.03.28
  • Published : 2019.04.20

Abstract

The domestic earthquake-resistant regulation was legislated firstly in 1988. However, The magnitude and frequency of earthquakes has been risen in South Korea. Therefore, the mandatory target of earthquake-resistant has been expanded. The earthquake-resistant rates of public facilities have been increased by 58.3%. On the other hand, education facilities are low with 24.8%. For the reason, more than 50% of the educational facilities are expected to be damaged by the earthquake. Especially, the 45% of educational facilities were damaged at Po-Hang earthquake. As a result, the importance of the seismic retrofit for applying existing education facilities was ended up attracting people's interesting. In this respect, in order to develop a effective seismic retrofit method, many researchers have been conducted researches and it is expected to be actively carried out in the future. However, it is insufficient to consider that how far technology has been developed. Therefore, the purpose of this study is a comparative analysis of precedent guidelines in regard to seismic retrofit applying existing education facilities between domestic and other countries. Finally, the directions of future research are suggested.

국내 내진규정은 1988년에 최초로 제정되었으나 국내에서 발생하는 지진의 규모와 발생빈도가 증가하면서 내진 의무대상을 지속적으로 확대시켜왔다. 공공 시설물의 내진율은 58.3%로 증가한 반면에 교육 시설물의 내진율은 24.8%에 그치고 있는 실정이다. 이로 인해, 지진발생 시 국내 교육시설물의 50% 이상이 대규모피해를 받을 것이라 예측되고 있다. 실제로 포항지진에 의해 발생한 피해는 45%가 교육시설물로 나타남에 따라 국내 기존 교육시설물에 대한 내진 보강은 국민들의 주요 관심사가 되었다. 보다 효과적인 내진 공법을 개발하기 위하여 국내의 많은 연구자들이 연구를 수행해왔으며 앞으로도 활발히 진행될 것으로 예상된다. 하지만, 국내 기술의 발전이 어느 정도까지 이루어졌는가에 대한 고찰은 부족한 실정이다. 이에 본 연구에서는 국내 외 기존 교육시설물의 내진에 대한 가이드라인을 비교 분석하고 향후 연구 방향을 제언하고자 한다.

Keywords

GCSGBX_2019_v19n2_157_f0001.png 이미지

Figure 1. The average total floor area of education facilities per building

GCSGBX_2019_v19n2_157_f0002.png 이미지

Figure 2. Distribution rate of earthquake-resistant by year

Table 1. Earthquake-resistant rate by basic plan of seismic retrofit

GCSGBX_2019_v19n2_157_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Types of seismic retrofit building

GCSGBX_2019_v19n2_157_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Classification of seismic retrofit strategic

GCSGBX_2019_v19n2_157_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Domestic and Foreign Nonstructural Classification System

GCSGBX_2019_v19n2_157_t0004.png 이미지

References

  1. Ministry of the Interior and Safety. The Pohang earthquake white paper in 2017. Seoul (Korea): Ministry of the Interior and Safety; 2018 Agu. 154p. Report No.: 11-1741000-000123-01.
  2. Hwang HK. The earthquake rate of public facilities is 58.3%, 14.6%p increase year-on-year[Internet]. 2018 Mar 1. Ministry of the Interior and Safety. Available from: https://www.mpss.go.kr/home/news/disasterInfo/disasterNews/;jsessionid=e54uCKKUJCoI0k06cS6c5CJV.node10?boardId=bbs_0000000000000046&mode=view&cntId=35668&category=&pageIdx=195&searchCondition=&searchKeyword=
  3. An H. The non-earthquake-proof structure rate is 55%, it might be damaged[Internet]. Yonhap News Agency. 2011 Mar 14. Available from: http://www.yonhapnews.co.kr/bulletin/2011/03/14/0200000000AKR20110314035400001.HTML
  4. Ko HB. A Study on the mechanical characteristics of compression member confined the cast frame using continuous fiber mesh. Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction. 2014 Dec;2(4):99-104. https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIC.2002.2.4.099
  5. Kwon HJ, Yang KH, Sim JI. Proposals of reliable shapes of supplementary v-ties for section jacketing method of columns. Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction. 2018 Apr;18(2):99-107. https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIBC.2018.18.2.099
  6. Kang SB, Kwak JM, Shin DW, Son KY. Economic analysis of a 5-story rc omrf retrofitted with modified epoxy mortar for improving seismic performance. Journal of the Korea Institute of Building Construction. 2014 Jun;14(3):207-15. https://doi.org/10.5345/JKIBC.2014.14.3.207
  7. Ju CG, Han JY, Park TW. Seismic performance evaluation of school building short column effect. Journal of the Korean Institute of Educational Facilities. 2014 Mar;21(2):33-9. https://doi.org/10.7859/KIEF.2014.21.2.033
  8. Yu US. Establishing specialized institution and safety management methods of education facilities. Seoul(Korea): Korean Educational Development Institute; 2014 Oct. 136p. Report No.: CR2014-69.
  9. Ministry of the Interior and Safety. The 9.12 white paper. Seoul(Korea): Ministry of the Interior and Safety; 2017 408 p.
  10. Kim HJ. The basic plan for seismic retrofit of existing public facilities-phase 2(2016-2020). Seoul(Korea): Ministry of Public Safety and Security; 2015. 371 p.
  11. Jung SC. An analysis on the formation and implementation process of the earthquake hazard mitigation policies, the case of the program for seismic retrofit of school buildings in the seoul metropolitan office of education [dissertation]. [Seoul(Korea)]: University of Seoul; 2013. 262 p.
  12. Korean Educational Development Institute. Development of seismic performance evaluation model for school safety. Jincheon(Korea): Korean Educational Development Institute; 2015 Dec. 448 p. Report No.: RR2015-38.
  13. Presidential commission on architecture policy. Public hearings on reasonable seismic retrofit policies for the safety of education facilities[Internet]. Korea:Presidential commission on architecture policy; 2017 Nov [citied 2017 Nov 21]. Available from: http://www.pcap.go.kr/public/reference/reference_view.jsp?tnum=4&lnum=1
  14. Ministry of Education. Development of seismic retrofit guideline and performance evaluation of education facilities. Seoul(Korea): Ministry of Education; 2018. 356 p.
  15. Han SW. Korean seismic design code and application status. Review of Architecture and Building Science. 2011 May;55(5):22-6.
  16. Korean Educational Development Institute. Development of seismic retrofit guideline and performance evaluation of education facilities. Seoul(Korea): Korean Educational Development Institute; 2011 Agu. 183 p. Report No.: CR2011-41.
  17. Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA). Techniques for the seismic Rehabilitation of existing buildings-a practical guide, fourth edition(FEMA-547). Washington DC:Federal Emergency Management Agency; 2006. 571 p.
  18. Ryu SH, Yun HD, Kim SW, Lee KS, Kim YC. Nonlinear behavior of seismic-strengthened domestic school building. Journal of the Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance Inspection. 2011 Jan;15(1):243-53. https://doi.org/10.11112/jksmi.2011.15.1.243
  19. Korean Educational Development Institute. Seismic retrofit design criteria of education facilities. Seoul(Korea): Korean Educational Development Institute; 2009. 44 p.
  20. Choi KS, You YC, inventors; Song SG, assignee. Brace damping system having connection for preventing out plane buckling. Republic of Korea RK 10-1425444. 2014 Agu 1.
  21. Ahn CW, Kim SJ. A study about seismic evaluation and rehabilitation of Existing Buildings. rev. ed. Jinju(Korea): Korea Infrastructure Safety Corporation; 2011. 255 p. Korean.
  22. National Fire Agency. Seismic evaluation guideline of buildings. Sejong(Korea): National Fire Agency; 2012. 156 p.
  23. Federal Emergency Management Agency(FEMA). FEMA E-74 Reducing the Risks of Nonstructural Earthquake Damage. Washington DC:Federal Emergency Management Agency; 2012. 885 p.
  24. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. The seismic resistant guidebook for non-structure member of education facilities(revising version)[Internet]. Tokyo:MEXT; 2015 Mar [citied 2015 Mar 27]. Available from: http://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/shisetu/shuppan/1291462.htm
  25. Korea Institute of Sustainable Designs and Educational Environment(KISEE). A study on the actual condition survey and maintenance improvement of school facilities. Seoul(Korea): Korea Institute of Sustainable Designs and Educational Environment; 2013. 162 p.