한국체육학회지인문사회과학편

Korean Alliance for Health: Physical Education: Recreation:and Dance (한국체육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Relationship Between Collegiate Student Exercise Intention and Leisure-Time Physical Activity: The Mediating Role of Action and Coping Planning

대학생들의 운동의도와 여가시간 신체활동 간의 관계에서 극복계획과 실행계획의 매개역할

  • Received : 2018.11.30
  • Accepted : 2019.01.28
  • Published : 2019.01.31
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to test the mediating effect of coping plan and action plan in the relation between leisure-time physical activity(LTPA) intention and exercise behavior and to extend the literature in theory of planned behavior. We examined the mediating role of implementation plan-namely coping plan and action plan in the effect of intention to physical activity on exercise behavior. To attain the goal of study, we asked collegiate students (n=253; male=118, female=105) report their intention toward LTPA, coping plan, action plan, and self-reported exercise behavior. Collected data was analyzed using statistical program software (i.e., SPSS, AMOS) for SEM and mediation analyses. The results revealed that intention toward LTPA was positively related to implementation plan (coping plan and action plan) and exercise behavior. Collegiate students' intention toward LTPA positively predicted their exercise behavior mediated by implementation plans. Specifically, LTPA intention among collegiate students predicted their exercise behavior via coping plan and action plan. The findings showed that coping plan and action plan partially mediated in the relation between LTPA intention and exercise behavior. In conclusion, students' intention to be getting physical active in leisure-time physical activity explains lifetime physical activity or the level of recent exercise behavior possibly via coping plan (e.g., how to overcome barriers to exercise) and action plan (e.g., when and where I exercise and get physically active). The conceptualization of coping plan and action plan in implementation plans and test of its model better to explain the intention-behavior gap would help exercise instructors or practitioners effectively develop their plans and strategies toward targeted exercise behavior.

이 연구는 여가시간 신체활동 의도와 운동행동 간의 관계에서의 틈(gap)을 극복하고 이 관계를 잇는 매개 변인들의 역할을 검증하고, 기존의 계획행동이론의 확장을 도모하는데 목적을 두었다. 이에 여가시간 신체활동에 대한 의도와 운동행동 간의 관계에서 실천계획-1)극복계획과 2)실행계획-의 매개효과를 검증하였다. 연구의 목적을 달성하기 위하여 편의표집법을 활용하여 강원도 내 위치한 세 곳의 대학에서 교양체육에 참여하고 있는 대학생 253명(남학생=118; 여학생=105)을 대상으로 설문조사를 하였다. 수집된 자료는 SPSS와 Amos프로그램을 활용하여 분석되었으며, 기술통계, 신뢰도, 상관분석, 그리고 구조 관계를 검증하기 위해 구조방정식 모형을 적용하여 의도, 극복계획 및 실행계획, 그리고 여가시간 신체활동 및 운동 간의 관계를 검증하였다. 특히, 의도와 행동 간의 관계에서 극복계획과 실행계획의 매개효과를 검증하기 매개 분석을 실시하였다. 그 결과, 신체활동 의도는 실행계획과 운동행동에 직접적으로 영향을 미쳤으며, 실행계획은 의도에 비해 실제 운동행동을 더욱더 잘 예측하는 것으로 나타났다. 따라서 매개변인인 극복계획과 실행계획은 신체활동에 대한 참여 의도가 실제 운동행동에 미치는 영향에서 부분적으로 모두 매개역할을 하는 것으로 나타났다. 이 연구를 통해 나타난 결과를 종합해 보면, 극복계획과 실행계획의 개념화와 모형검증은 의도-행동의 틈을 극복하고 실제 현장에서 실용적으로 활용될 수 있다는 사실을 알 수 있었다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50 (2), 179-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t
  2. Araujo-Soarea, V., McIntyre, T., MacLennan, G., & Sniehotta, F. F. (2009). Predicting changes in physical activity amongst adolescents: The role of self-efficacy, intention, action planning and coping planning. Health Education Research, 24, 128-139.
  3. Belair, M-A, Kohen, DE, Kingsbury, M., & Colman, I. (2018). Relationship between leisure-time physical activity, sedentary behaviors, and symptoms of depression and anxiety: eviden ce from a population-based sample of Canadian adolescents. BMJ Open, 8, 211-219.
  4. Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford.
  5. Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology (CSEP, 2011). Canadian physical activity guidelines information sheet. http://www.csep.ca/english/view.asp?x=804. Accessed June 30, 2011.
  6. Carraro, N., & Gaudreau, P. (2013). Spontaneous and experimentally induced action planning and coping planning for physical activity: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Sport & Exercise, 14, 228-248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2012.10.004
  7. Cheon, S. H., & Kim, B. R. (2017). Reciprocal relations between students leisure-time physical activity and self-determined motivation. Korean Journal of Physical Education, 56, 389-402. https://doi.org/10.23949/kjpe.2017.11.56.6.27
  8. Corcker, L. & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
  9. Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54, 493-503. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.493
  10. Hagger, M. S., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2016). The trans-contextual model of autonomous motivation in education: Conceptual and empirical issues and meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 86, 360-407. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315585005
  11. Hagger, M. S., Chan, D. K. C., Protogerou, C., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2016). Ysubg meta-analytic path analysis to test theoretical predictions in health behavior: An illustration based on meta-analysis of the theory of planned behavior. Preventive Medicine, 89, 154-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.05.020
  12. Hallal, P. C., Andersen, L. B., Bull, F. C., Guthold, R., Haskell, W. L., Ekelund, U., et al. (2012). Global physical activity levels: Surveillance progress, pitfalls, and prospects. The Lancet, 380, 247-257. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60646-1
  13. Hamilton, M. T., Hamilton, D. G., & Zderic, T. W. (2004). Exercise physiology versus inactivity physiology: an essential concept for understand-ing lipoprotein lipase regulation. Exercise Sport Science Review, 32, 161-166. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003677-200410000-00007
  14. Hannan, T. E., Moffitt, R. L., Neumann, D. L., & Thomas, P. R. (2015). Applying the satisfaction and classtheory of planned behavior to physical activity: The moderated role of mental toughness. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 37, 514-522. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.2015-0074
  15. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
  16. Kim, B. R., & Cheon, S. H. (2018). Relationship between students' beliefs about collegiate physical education, intention, and leisure-time exercise behavior: Theory of planned behavior's perspective. Korean Journal of Physical Education, 57 (1), 305-319.
  17. Kim. B. R(2014). Effects of Leisure Education based on the Theory of Planned Behavior on the Perception of Personal Health, Generativity and Successful Aging of the Middle-Aged Women. Unpublished, Kangwon National University.
  18. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  19. Mistry, C. D., Sweet, S. N., Latimer-Cheung, A. E., & Rhodes, R. E. (2015). Predicting changes in planning behaviour and physical activity among adults. Psychology of Sport & Exercise, 17, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2014.10.002
  20. Norman, P., & Conner, M. (2005). The theory of planned behavior and exercise: Evidence for the mediating and moderating roles of planning on intention-behavior relationships. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 27 (4), 488-504. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.27.4.488
  21. Park, J. H., Kim, E. S., & Jeon, Y. G. (2010). Association between the level of past 2-year leisure time physical activity, participation obesity and insulin resistance the risk factors of cardiovascular disease among Korean male adolescents. Korean Journal of Physical Education, 49, 403-411.
  22. Pfeffer, I., & Strobach, T. (2017). Behavioural automaticity moderates and mediates the relationship of trait self-control and physical activity behaviour. Journal Psychology & Health, 33, 925-940. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2018.1436176
  23. Prapavessis, H., Gaston, A., & DeJesus, S. (2015). The theory of planned behavior as a model for understanding sedentary behavior. Psychology of Sport & Exercise, 19, 23-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.02.001
  24. Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.40.3.879
  25. Reynolds, A. J., & McDonough, M. H. (2015). Moderated and mediated effects of coach autonomy support, coach involvement, and psychological need satisfaction on motivation in youth sport. International Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 11, 395-407.
  26. Rhodes, R. E., & de Bruijn, G. J. (2013). What predicts intention-behavior discordance? A review of the action control framework. Exercise and Sports Sciences Reviews, 41(4), 201-207. https://doi.org/10.1097/JES.0b013e3182a4e6ed
  27. Rhodes, R. E., & Dickau, L. (2013). Moderators of the intention-behaviour relationship in the physical activity domain: A systematic review. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 47, 215-225. https://doi.org/10.1136/bjsports-2011-090411
  28. Schuz, B., Sone-Wai Li, A., Hardinge, A., McEachan, R. R. C., & Conner, M. (2017). Socioeconomic status as a moderator between social cognitions and physical activity: Systematic review and meta-analysis based on the Theory of Planned Behavior. Psychology of Sport & Exercise, 30, 186-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2017.03.004
  29. Sheeran, P., & Webb, T. L. (2016). The intentionbehavior gap. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10, 503-518. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12265
  30. Sniehotta, F. F. (2009). Towards a theory of intentional behavior change: plans, planning, and self-regulation. British Journal of Health Psychology, 14, 261-273. https://doi.org/10.1348/135910708X389042
  31. Sniehotta, F. F., Scholz, U., & Schwarzer, R. (2005). Bridging the intention-behaviour gap: Planning, self-efficacy and action control in the adoption and maintenance of physical exercise. Psychology and Health, 20, 143-160. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870440512331317670
  32. Sutton, S. (2008). How does the health action process approach (HAPA) bridge the intention-behavior gap? an examination of the model's causal structure. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 57, 66-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2007.00326.x

Cited by

  1. DEVELOPING A MODEL OF HEALTH BEHAVIOR INTENTIONS AND ACTUAL HEALTH BEHAVIORS OF KOREAN MALE UNIVERSITY STUDENTS vol.16, pp.1, 2019, https://doi.org/10.15586/jomh.v16i1.163