DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Fast-fashion retailers - Types of online-based internationalization -

  • Lee, Jung Eun (Dept. of Apparel, Housing, and Resource Management, Virginia Tech)
  • Received : 2019.01.12
  • Accepted : 2019.02.15
  • Published : 2019.02.28

Abstract

This study identified types of online retail internationalization in the fast-fashion context and proposed driving factors of retailers' choices in online-based market entry following the logic of the Uppsala model and the eclectic theory. In particular, this study proposes three types of online-based internationalization: 1) entering a host market with a physical store first, and then expanding with an online store, 2) entering a foreign market with an online store, then expanding to physical stores, and 3) entering only with an online business. In addition, this study investigated the causal factors, ownership-specific and location advantages, that influence the choice of the type of developmental process of online-based internationalization. To develop theoretical and managerial insights into the issue researched, this study employed a qualitative research design involving case studies of three European fast-fashion retailers, H&M, TOPSHOP, and ASOS. This study suggested that fast-fashion retailers that enter a host market with high ownership-specific advantages are likely to choose to enter the market with physical stores and then expand with online stores. On the other hand, when faced with uncertainties attributable to low ownership-specific or location advantages, fast-fashion retailers are likely to choose to enter with an online store first and then expand with physical stores as conditions change. Consequently, this study provides a better understanding for fast-fashion retailers who are willing to expand their businesses to foreign markets via online stores.

Keywords

References

  1. Agarwal, S., & Ramaswami, S. N. (1992). Choice of foreign market entry mode: Impact of ownership, location and internalization factors. Journal of International Business Studies, 23(1), 1-27. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490257
  2. ASOS. (2017). Annual report and account 2017. Retrieved January 31, 2019, from http://www.annualreports.com/HostedData/AnnualReports/PDF/LSE_ASOS_2017.pdf
  3. Axinn, C. N., & Matthyssens, P. (2002). Limits of internationalization theories in an unlimited world. International Marketing Review, 19(5), 436-449. doi:10.1108/02651330210445275
  4. Bennett, R. (1997). Export marketing and the internet: Experiences of web site use and perceptions of export barriers among UK businesses. International Marketing Review, 14(5), 324-344. doi:10.1108/02651339710184307
  5. Berry, M. M. J., & Brock, J. K.-U. (2004). Marketspace and the internationalisation process of the small firm. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 2(3), 187-216. doi:10.1023/B:JIEN.0000032773.32304.a6
  6. Camuffo, A., Furlan, A., Romano, P., & Vinelli, A. (2006). The process of supply network internationalisation. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, 12(3), 135-147. doi:10.1016/j.pursup.2006.07.002
  7. Cavusgil, S. T. (1984). Differences among exporting firms based on their degree of internationalization. Journal of Business Research, 12(2), 195-208. doi:10.1016/0148-2963(84)90006-7
  8. Dunning, J. H. (1980). Toward an eclectic theory of international production: Some empirical tests. Journal of International Business Studies, 11(1), 9-31. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490593
  9. Dunning, J. H. (1988). The eclectic paradigm of international production: A restatement and some possible extensions. Journal of International Business Studies, 19(1), 1-31. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490372
  10. Dunning, J. H., & McQueen, M. (1981). The eclectic theory of international production: A case study of the international hotel industry. Managerial and Decision Economics, 2(4), 197-210. doi:10.1002/mde.4090020401
  11. Evans, J., & Mavondo, F. T. (2002). Psychic distance and organizational performance: An empirical examination of international retailing operations. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(3), 515-532. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8491029
  12. Forsgren, M. (2002). The concept of learning in the Uppsala internationalization process model: A critical review. International Business Review, 11(3), 257-277. doi:10.1016/S0969-5931(01)00060-9
  13. Forsgren, M., & Hagstrom, P. (2007). Ignorant and impatient internationalization?: The Uppsala model and internationalization patterns for internet-related firms. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 3(4), 291-305. doi:10.1108/17422040710832559
  14. H&M. (n.d.). Market overview. Retrieved February 3, 2019, from https://about.hm.com/en/about-us/markets-and-expansion/market-overview.html
  15. Handfield, R. B., & Melnyk, S. A. (1998). The scientific theory-building process: A primer using the case of TQM. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 321-339. doi:10.1016/S0272-6963(98)00017-5
  16. Holsti, O. R. (1969). Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  17. Hutchinson, K., Alexander, N., Quinn, B., & Doherty, A. M. (2007). Internationalization motives and facilitating factors: Qualitative evidence from smaller specialist retailers. Journal of International Marketing, 15(3), 96-122. doi:10.1509/jimk.15.3.96
  18. Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. (1977). The internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), 23-32. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490676
  19. Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. (2003). Business relationship learning and commitment in the internationalization process. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 1(1), 83-101. doi:10.1023/A:1023219207042
  20. LIPPY. (2012, October 28). TOPSHOP: A history. A look behind the highstreet brand. Retrieved January 31, 2019, from http://www.lippymag.co.uk/topshop-a-history-a-look-behind-the-highstreet-brand
  21. Overby, J. W., & Min, S. (2001). International supply chain management in an internet environment: A network-oriented approach to internationalization. International Marketing Review, 18(4), 392-420. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000005933
  22. Park, Y., & Sternquist, B. (2008). The global retailer's strategic proposition and choice of entry mode. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 36(4), 281-299. doi:10.1108/09590550810862688
  23. Prllegrini, L. (1994). Alternatives for growth and internationalization in retailing. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 4(2), 121-148. doi:10.1080/09593969400000012
  24. Runfola, A., & Guercini, S. (2013). Fast fashion companies coping with internationalization: Driving the change or changing the model?. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal, 17(2), 190-205. doi:10.1108/JFMM-10-2011-0075
  25. Sternquist, B. (2007). International retailing (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Fairchild.
  26. TOPSHOP. (n.d.). Store locator. Retrieved February 3, 2019, from http://www.topshop.com/en/tsuk/category/store-finder-1824332/home?cat2=1102568&intcmpid=W_FOOTER_MAIN_%20STORE_FINDER
  27. Vida, I., Reardon, J., & Fairhurst, A. (2000). Determinants of international retail involvement: The case of large U.S. retail chains. Journal of International Marketing, 8(4), 37-60. doi:10.1509/jimk.8.4.37.19792