Journal of Digital Convergence (디지털융복합연구)

The Society of Digital Policy and Management (한국디지털정책학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Study on the Causal Relationship Between Attributes of VR Ad and Advertising Effectiveness: Mediating Effect of the Consumer's Innovation

VR 광고 특성과 광고효과 간의 인과관계에 관한 연구 : 소비자 혁신성의 매개효과

  • 최윤슬 (한양대학교 광고홍보학과) ;
  • 유승엽 (남서울대학교 광고홍보학과)
  • Received : 2018.11.14
  • Accepted : 2019.02.20
  • Published : 2019.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

This study investigated whether the model attributes of VR Ads (3D effect, presence, Dynamics, Amusement) affect the attitude of the advertising. We also examined the mediating role of consumer's innovation in the model attributes and advertising attitude of VR advertisements. To do this, VR equipment was used to induce real advertisers to experience advertisements. The causal relationship between variables was examined through covariance structure analysis. The results are as follows. First, all independent variables of the VR advertising model have a positive effect on the consumer's innovation. Second, the 3D effect, Amusement of the VR advertising model have a positive effect on the attitude of the advertising. Third, the effects of the VR advertising model on all variables are mediated by the consumer's innovation of the VR advertisement. The results of this study provide implications for understanding the characteristics of VR Ads.

본 연구는 VR 광고 특성(입체감, 현실감, 역동감, 오락감)이 광고태도에 어떠한 영향을 미치는 가를 알아보았다. 또한 VR 광고 특성과 광고태도에 있어 소비자 혁신성이 매개 역할을 하는지 검증하였다. 본 연구는 VR 장비를 사용하여 실제 응답자에게 광고물 경험을 유도하였다. 분석은 공변량 구조분석을 통해 변인 간 인과관계를 알아보았다. 연구 결과 첫째, VR 광고 특성의 네 가지 구성요인 모두 소비자 혁신성에 정적인 영항을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 둘째, VR 광고 특성의 입체감, 오락감은 광고태도에 정적인 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 셋째, VR 광고 특성과 광고태도에 관계에 있어 소비자 혁신성의 매개역할은 VR 광고 특성의 구성요인 모두 유의한 영항을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구결과는 VR 광고를 제작할 때 광고 효과 과정을 이해하고 디지털 미디어 시장에 적합한 광고를 기획하는데 시사점을 제공할 것이다.

Keywords

DJTJBT_2019_v17n2_37_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Research model

DJTJBT_2019_v17n2_37_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. Used VR BOX in research

DJTJBT_2019_v17n2_37_f0003.png 이미지

Fig. 3. Finalized model

Table 1. confirmatory factor analysis

DJTJBT_2019_v17n2_37_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. Results of hypothesis tests

DJTJBT_2019_v17n2_37_t0002.png 이미지

References

  1. Jaron, Lanie. (1989). Virtual reality: an interview with Appears In. Whole Earth Review, 64(Fall), 108-130.
  2. G. Coates. (1992). Program from Invisible Site-a virtual sho, a multimedia performance work presented by George Coates Performance Works, San Francisco, CA.
  3. Steuer, Jonathan. (1992). Defining Virtual Reality: Dimensions Determining Tele-presence. Journal of Communication, 42(4), 73-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1992.tb00812.x
  4. Heim, Michael. (1993). The Metaphysics of Virtual Reality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  5. Y. M. Kwon. (2017). Virtual Reality SNS era opens in earnest... Killer content. Seoul Economy. http://www.sedaily.com/NewsView/1ODAXWXRH3.
  6. H. S. Lee. (2016). A Study on the Factors Affecting the Intention of Using VR Games. Information Management. Yonsei University, Seoul.
  7. H. J. Ahn. (2015). Virtual reality, explosion from 2016? Shipments forecast at 14 million units. ZDNet. http://www.zdnet.co.kr/news/.
  8. B. Y. Jung. (2016). Virtual reality (VR) ecosystem status and implications. Information and communication broad-casting policy, 28, 1-23.
  9. H. S. Jun, M. G. Han & J. H. Jang. (2017). Application trends in virtual reality. Electronics and Telecommunications Trends. Korea Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute, 32(1), 93-101.
  10. KT Economic Research Institute. (2016). Future Industry Forecasts Changed by Virtual Reality (VR). Operator Wyatt, Digi-Eco Report.
  11. J. W. Lee, E. J. Park & M. G. Choi. (2018). The Study on the Effect of Outdoor Experiential Marketing on Brand and Purchase Intentions. The Society of Digital Policy & Management, 15(5), 139-150.
  12. K. Suh & Y. Lee. (2005). The effect of virtual reality on consumer learning: An empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 29(4), 673-697. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148705
  13. S. E. Kober & C. Neuper. (2013). Personality and presence in virtual reality: Does their relationship depend on the used presence measure?. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 29, 13-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2012.668131
  14. Forbes. (2016). Virtual Reality Will save Retail. www.forbes.com.
  15. G. J. Gu, Y. K. Kim & H. B. Lee. (2017). he Research about the Effect of Aesthetic Value Shown in Brand Design on Willingness to Pay Additional Cost: Based on Mediated Effect of Perceived Innovation, Korea Advertising Society, 28(1), 177-202. https://doi.org/10.14377/KJA.2017.1.15.8
  16. J. Zhang. (2010). To play or not to play: An exploratory content analysis of branded entertainment in Facebook. American Journal of Business, 25(1), 53-64. https://doi.org/10.1108/19355181201000005
  17. Rogers. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations, 5th edition, New York: The Free Press.
  18. R. Agarwal & E. Karahanna. (2000). Time Files When You're Having Fun: Congnitive Absoption and Beliefs About Information Technology Usage, MIS Quarterly, 24 (4), 665-694. https://doi.org/10.2307/3250951
  19. Mackenzie, Lutz & Belch. (1986). The Role of Attitude toward the Ad as a Mediator of Advertising Effectiveness: A Test of Competing Explanations, Journal of Marketing Research, 23(may), 130-143. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378602300205
  20. Baumgartner, Hans & Jan-Benedict E. M. Steenkamp. (1996). Exploratory Consumer Buying Behavior: Conceptualization and Measurement, International. Journal of Research in Marketing, 13, 121-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-8116(95)00037-2
  21. J. B. Walther, T. Loh & L. Granka. (2005). Let me count the ways: The interchange of verbal and nonverbal cues in computer-mediated and face-to-face affinity. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 24, 36-65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X04273036
  22. R. McGloin, K. S. Hull & J. L. Christensen. (2016). The social implications of casual online gaming: Examining the effects of competitive setting and performance outcome on player perceptions. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 173-181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.02.022
  23. H. G. Koo. (2017). A Study on Consumer-Centric Smart Mobile Virtual Store. The Society of Digital Policy & Management, 11(30), 209-219.