Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education (정보교육학회논문지)

Korea Association of Information Education (한국정보교육학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analysis of Differences in Self-directed Learning According to Longitudinal Pattern of Information Retrieval Ability and Frequency

정보검색 능력과 빈도의 종단적 패턴에 따른 자기주도학습 능력 차이분석

  • 심재권 (고려대학교 영재교육원)
  • Received : 2019.11.06
  • Accepted : 2019.11.29
  • Published : 2019.12.31
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

In the advanced information age, learning is an activity in which learners access information resources through computers and Internet to acquire and evaluate information on their own. The emergence of an online learning platform based on the fourth industrial revolution technology is developing into an environment in which elementary and secondary learners learn and study based on constructivism learning theory. In the online learning environment, the researches on the information retrieval ability of the elementary and secondary learners and the self-directed learning ability were found to be highly related. However, it is necessary to analyze the relation between information retrieval ability and self-directed learning ability through a cross-sectional study that is limited to specific curriculum and contents and expands the longitudinal research. In this study, the panel data of the Seoul Education Longitudinal Study collected over 8 years are used to find the difference in self-directed learning ability according to the longitudinal pattern of information retrieval ability and frequency.

고도화된 정보 시대의 학습은 학습자가 컴퓨터와 인터넷을 통해 정보자원에 접근하여 정보를 자기주도적으로 습득하고 평가하는 활동이라 할 수 있다. 4차 산업혁명 기술에 기반한 온라인 학습 플랫폼의 등장은 구성주의 학습이론에 기반하여 초중등 학습자가 자기주도적으로 정보를 검색하여 학습하는 환경으로 발전하고 있다. 온라인 학습환경에서 초중등 학습자의 정보검색 능력과 자기주도학습 능력에 대한 기존 연구를 살펴보면, 변인간의 긍정적 관련성이 높은 것으로 분석되었다. 하지만, 이는 특정 교과 수업과 콘텐츠에 국한된 횡단적인 연구로 보다 확장된 형태의 종단적인 연구를 통해 정보검색 능력과 자기주도학습 능력 간의 관련성을 분석해볼 필요가 있다. 본 연구에서는 8년 동안 수집된 서울교육종단연구의 패널데이터를 활용하여 정보검색 능력과 정보검색 빈도의 종단적인 패턴에 따른 자기주도학습 능력의 차이를 밝히고자 한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Ahn, S.H. (2019). The Effect of Computer Literacy on Learner’s Cognitive Aspects Learning Ability. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 23(2), 169-177. https://doi.org/10.14352/jkaie.2019.23.2.169
  2. Ahn, W.W. (2000). Effect of internet information search on survey learning ability of social studies of elementary school. Master dissertation, Hanyang University.
  3. American Library Association (1989). Presidential Committee on information Literacy Find Report. Chicago : ALA.
  4. American Library Association (1998). Information literacy standards for students learning. Chicago : ALA.
  5. Bae, K.J., Park, H.J. (2013). A Study on the Current Condition and the Improvement of Digital Literacy Education. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 44(2), 241-265. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.44.2.201306.241
  6. Candy, P. (1991). Self-direction for lifelong learning: A comprehensive guide theory and practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossy-Bass.
  7. Genolini, C., Alacoque, X., Sentenac, M., & Arnaud, C. (2015). Kml and kml3d: R packages to cluster longitudinal data. Journal of Statistical Software, 65(4), 1-34.
  8. Hartigan, J.A. & M. A. Wong (1979). Algorithm AS 136: A K-Means Clustering Algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics), 28(1), 100-108.
  9. Honebein, p., Duffy, T.M., & Fishman, B. (1993). Constructivism and design of learning envieonments : Context and authentic activieies for learning. Heidelberg, Germany : Springer-Verlag.
  10. Jang, S.J., & Chun, S.J. (2014). The Study on Information Retrieval Methods for Elementary School Students. Proceedings of the Korean Society of Computer Information Conference, 22(1), 227-230.
  11. Jang, Y.J., Han, S.K. (2007), The Study on Analysis and Improvement of ICT Application Types for Information Education. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 11(1), 39-46.
  12. Jeong, S.M., Han, B.R., Song, G.S. (2005). On the Development of Animated Tutoring Dialogue Agent for Elementary School Science Learning. Journal of The Korean Association of Information Education, 9(4), 673-684.
  13. Jonassen, D. H. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments, In C. M. Reigeluth(Ed.). Instructional design theories and models, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  14. Kang, D.H. (2006). Study on Unit-Learning of Korean Language through ICT : centered on Korean(1) Textbook of High School, Kangwon National University.
  15. Kim, S.J. (2001). A Study on A Model for Designing Constructivist Learning Environment. Journal of Research in Curriculum & Instruction, 5(2), 5-20.
  16. Kim, Y.M. (2013). Interrelation Comparison of Web Information Retrieval Ability and Subject Record, Master dissertation, Kangwon National University.
  17. Knowles, M. S. (1975). Self-directed learning: A guide for learners and teachers. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Cambridge.
  18. Korea Education and Research Information Service (2003). How to ICT; A Study on Teaching and Learning Method and Materials Development Using Korean Language ICT. RR 2003-1.
  19. Korea Education and Research Information Service (2017). In-Depth Analysis of Elementary and Middle School Students' ICT Literacy Levels (2007-2016). KR 2017-6.
  20. Korea Education and Research Information Service (2018). ChatBot use case and e-learning strategy. RM 2018-11.
  21. Korea Information Society Development Institute (2017). Major Contents of the 2017 Korea Media Panel Survey. KISDI STAT Report, 17-23, 1-9.
  22. Korea Internet & Security Agency (2018). Survey on the Internet Usage.
  23. Korea Library Association (2007). Library and Information Life Curriculum Standards, Seoul : Korea Library Association 2007.
  24. Ministry of Education & Human Resources Development (2005). Explanation of Guidelines for Information and Communication Technology Education for Elementary and Secondary Schools.
  25. Ministry of Education (2015). Elementary and Secondary Curriculum. Public Announcement 2015-74.
  26. National Center for Education Statistics (2003). Educational Longitudinal Study of 2002: Base Year Field Test Report.
  27. Park, C.H., Lee, J. G., Kim, Y.J., Kwak, H.W., & Lee, J.M. (1998). Exploratory Learning and User Strategy in Information Search on the Internet. Korean Journal of Cognitive Science, 9(4), 17-32.
  28. Perkins, D. (1991). Technology meets constructivism : Do they make a marriage?. Educational Technology, 31(5), 18-23.
  29. Pintrich, P.R., Smith, D.A.F., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W.J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire( MLSQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801-813. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164493053003024
  30. Rim, K.H., Shin, J.M. & Lee, S.K. (2019). A Study on Development of Customized Education and Training Model Using Online Learning Platform. Journal of Practical Engineering Education, 11(1), 75-86. https://doi.org/10.14702/JPEE.2019.075
  31. Seoul Education Research & Information Institute (2011). Seoul Education Longitudinal Study 2010 User Guide.
  32. Shin, D.K. (2019). Feasibility and Constraints in Applying an AI Chatbot to English Education. Brain, Digital, & Learning, 9(2), 29-40. https://doi.org/10.31216/BDL.2019.9.2.029
  33. Son, M.H., Jeong, D.H., & Son, J.W. (2018). Analysis of Middle School Students’ Difficulties in Science Inquiry Activity in View of Knowledge and Information Processing Competence. Journal of the Korean Association for Science Education, 38(3), 441-449. https://doi.org/10.14697/JKASE.2018.38.3.441
  34. Song, M.J. (2019). Information Literacy and Writing Education for College Freshman. The Korean Journal of Literacy Research, 10(2), 45-69. https://doi.org/10.37736/kjlr.2019.04.10.2.45
  35. Yang, M.H. (2000). Study on the development and validation of self-regulated learning model, Ph. D. dissertation, Seoul University.
  36. Zimmerman, B. J. (1990). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational psychologist, 25(1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2501_2