DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Development and Evaluation of the Usefulness for Hoffman Brain Phantom Based on 3D Printing Technique

3D 프린팅 기법 기반의 Hoffman Brain 팬텀 개발 및 유용성 평가

  • Park, Hoon-Hee (Department of Radiological Technology, Shingu College) ;
  • Lee, Joo-Young (Department of Radiological Technology, Shongho University)
  • Received : 2019.11.28
  • Accepted : 2019.12.13
  • Published : 2019.12.31

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to recognize the usefulness of the Phantom produced with 3D printing technology by reproducing the original phantom with 3D printing technology. Using CT, we obtained information from the original phantom. The acquired file was printed by the SLA method of ABS materials. For inspection, SPECT/CT was used to obtain images. We filled the both Phantom with a solution mixed with 99mTcO4 1 mCi in 1 liter of water and acq uired images in accordance with the standard protocol. Using Image J, the SNR for each slice of the image was obtained. As a reference images, AC images were used. For the analysis of acquired images, ROI was set in the White mater and Gray mater sections of each image, and the average Intensity Value within the ROI were compared. According to the results of this study, 3D printed phantom's SNR is about 0.1 higher than the conventional phantom. And the ratio of Intensity Value was shown in the original 1 : 3.4, and the printed phantom was shown to be 1 : 3.2. Therefore, if Calibration Value is applied, It is assumed that it can be used as an alternative to the original.

Keywords

References

  1. Christensen A, Rybicki FJ. Maintaining safety and efficacy for 3D printing in medicine. 3D Print Med. 2017;3:1 https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-016-0009-5
  2. George F, Liacouras P, Rybicki FJ, Mitsouras D. Measuring and establishing the accuracy & reproducibility of 3D-printed medical models. Radiographics. 2017;37(5):1424-50. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2017160165
  3. Epley BL, Sadove AM. Computer-generated patient models for reconstruction of cranial and facial deformities, 1998;9(6):548-66. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001665-199811000-00011
  4. Salmia M, Paloheimo KS, Tuomia J, Wolff J, MMkitiead A. Accuracy of medical models made by additive manufacturing (rapid manufacturing). Journal of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery. 2013;41(7):603-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2012.11.041
  5. Charles W. 'Chuck' Hull: Apparatus for production of three-dimensional objects by stereolithography. US 4575330 A, United States Patent; 1984.
  6. S. Scott Crump: Apparatus and method for creating three-dimensional objects. US 5121329 A, United States Patent; 1989.
  7. Kang HD. Analysis of furniture design cases using 3D printing technique. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association. 2015;15(2):177-86. https://doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2015.15.02.177
  8. Lim YS. A study on the influence and potential of a 3D printer in the design and construction processes of the architectural industry [Doctorate]. Yonsei University; 2015.
  9. NASA. Printing Technology sparks Fly as NASA Pushes the Limits of 3-D. Aug 28, 2014. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.nasa.gov/press/2014/august/sparks-fly-as-nasa-pushes-the-limits-of-3-d-printing-technology/
  10. Kyung JH, Park JY, Yoon JW, et al. A 3D-printing bone model for surgical planning of total hip replacement after failed triple pelvic osteotomy. Journal of Veterinary Clinics. 2017;34(6):463-6. https://doi.org/10.17555/jvc.2017.12.34.6.463
  11. Veneziani GR, Correa EL, Potiens MPA, Campos LL. Attenuation coefficient determination of printed ABS and PLA samples in diagnostic radiology standard beams. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2016;733:1.
  12. Park HH, Lee JY, Kim JH. Evaluation of nuclear medicine applications of 3D printing phantom - Gamma camera centrically. The Korean Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology. 2017;21(2):65-73.
  13. Lee BI. Quality Assurance and performance evaluation of PET/CT, nuclear medicine molecular imaging. 2008;42(2):137-44.