DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

TGFBI Promoter Methylation is Associated with Poor Prognosis in Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients

  • Seok, Yangki (Department of Thoracic Surgery, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Lee, Won Kee (Department of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Park, Jae Yong (Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University) ;
  • Kim, Dong Sun (Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University)
  • Received : 2018.07.30
  • Accepted : 2018.12.10
  • Published : 2019.02.28

Abstract

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide and has high rates of metastasis. Transforming growth factor beta-inducible protein (TGFBI) is an extracellular matrix component involved in tumour growth and metastasis. However, the exact role of TGFBI in NSCLC remains controversial. Gene silencing via DNA methylation of the promoter region is common in lung tumorigenesis and could thus be used for the development of molecular biomarkers. We analysed the methylation status of the TGFBI promoter in 138 NSCLC specimens via methylation-specific PCR and evaluated the correlation between TGFBI methylation and patient survival. TGFBI promoter methylation was detected in 25 (18.1%) of the tumours and was demonstrated to be associated with gene silencing. We observed no statistical correlation between TGFBI methylation and clinicopathological characteristics. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that TGFBI methylation is significantly associated with poor survival outcomes in adenocarcinoma cases (adjusted hazard ratio = 2.88, 95% confidence interval = 1.19-6.99, P = 0.019), but not in squamous cell cases. Our findings suggest that methylation in the TGFBI promoter may be associated with pathogenesis of NSCLC and can be used as a predictive marker for lung adenocarcinoma prognosis. Further large-scale studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Keywords

INTRODUCTION

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 80% of all lung cancer cases (Siegel et al., 2014). Despite advances in early detection and standard treatment, more than 60% of NSCLC patients are diagnosed with distant metastasis, and NSCLC prognosis remains poor across all disease stages (Spiro & Silvestri, 2005). The molecular mechanisms underlying NSCLC are complex and heterogeneous, thereby presenting multiple and distinct clinical and histological features (Yano et al., 2011). A global variation also occurs in the epidemiology, biology, and treatment of NSCLC (Zhou et al., 2011). Ultimately, a better understanding of the molecular changes in carcinogenesis and metastasis in NSCLC could provide new insights for the identification of promising biomarkers for disease diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment (Sato et al., 2007). Alteration of DNA methylation patterns is recognized as a crucial factor in initiation and progression of NSCLC (Lu & Zhang, 2011). In a recent study, we demonstrated aberrant methylation of metastasisassociated genes in Korean NSCLC patients (Choi et al., 2008; Kim et al., 2007; 2017).

Transforming growth factor beta-induced protein (TGFBI, also known as keratoepithelin or βig-H3) is a secreted extracellular matrix (ECM) component that plays a crucial role in tumour growth and metastasis (Thapa et al., 2007). Interestingly, TGFBI can have dual function in cancer by acting as either a tumour suppressor or promoter (Ween et al., 2012). Loss of TGFBI expression caused by promoter hypermethylation has been reported in various cancers (Fang et al., 2014; Kang et al., 2007; Shah et al., 2008; Shao et al., 2006), whereas strong TGFBI expression was associated with cancer progression and metastasis in gastrointestinal tumours (Yokobori & Nishiyama, 2017). Unfortunately, the exact role of TGFBI in NSCLC remains controversial (Kim et al., 2003; Sasaki et al., 2002; Shin et al., 2012; Wen et al., 2011; Zhao et al., 2006). Therefore, to further elucidate the function and clinical significance of TGFBI in NSCLC, we investigated the methylation status of the TGFBI gene promoter region in 138 tumour tissues from NSCLC patients using methylationspecific polymerase chain reaction (MSP) and evaluated the correlation between TGFBI methylation pattern and patient survival.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients and tissue samples

Tumour tissues and matched non-malignant lung tissue specimens (n = 138) were provided by the National Biobank of Korea - Kyungpook National University Hospital (KNUH), which is supported by the Ministry of Health, Welfare, and Family Affairs. This study was conducted with the approval of the Ethics Committee of KNUH (No. 2014-04-210, 08/08/2014) and written informed consent was obtained from all of the participants prior to obtaining the samples. A total of 88 patients were adenocarcinoma (ADC) and 50 patients were squamous cell carcinoma (SQC). The clinicopathological characteristics of the patients are summarized in Table 1.

E1BJB7_2019_v42n2_161_t0001.png 이미지

Table 1. Correlation between TGFBI methylation and clinicopathological features of NSCLC patients

SQC, Squamous cell carcinoma: ADC, adenocarcinoma

Cell culture, total RNA isolation and RT-PCR

Three human lung cancer cell lines (A549, H522, and H810) were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (Manassas, USA). All cells were cultured following the instructions provided by the supplier. H522 cells were treated with the demethylating agent 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine (5- AzadC) for 3 days. Culture media were replaced daily. Total RNA was extracted from cultured cells and primary tumour tissues using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Total RNA quality was confirmed via electrophoresis on a 1.2% agarose-formaldehyde gel. After removing residual DNA, first-strand cDNA synthesis was performed using SuperScript preamplification kit (Invitrogen). The resulting cDNA was amplified using the sense primer 5′-CGTGGTCCATGTCATCACCAAT-3′ and antisense primer 5′-GCATTCCTCCTGTAGTGCTT-3′ as previously described (Sasaki et al., 2002). Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) was used as an internal reference gene for normalization of the TGFBI expression levels.

Genomic DNA isolation and methylation analysis

Genomic DNA was extracted using a QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (QIAGEN, USA). Genomic DNA was treated with sodium bisulfite, and the methylation status of the promoter region of the TGFBI gene was analysed using MSP with primers specific to either unmethylated or methylated alleles. Primers used for the methylated reaction were 5′-GCCGCCCGCTTG CCCGTCGGTC-3′ (sense) and 5′-AAACCCGCCAAAATCGC GACG-3′ (antisense) primers. Primers used for the unmethylated reaction were 5′-GCTGCCTGCTTGCCTGTTGGTT3′ (sense) and 5′-AAACCCACCAAAATCACAACA-3′ (antisense). All polymerase chain reaction (PCR) were carried out using reagents supplied in the GeneAmp DNA Amplification Kit using AmpliTaq Gold as the polymerase (PE Applied Biosystems, USA) on a PTC-100 instrument (MJ Research, Watertown, MA, USA). CpGenome Universal methylated and unmethylated DNA (Chemicon, USA) was used as the positive controls for methylated and unmethylated genes, respectively. Negative control samples without added DNA were included for each PCR run. PCR products were analysed on a 2% agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide, and visualized under UV light. Each MSP run was repeated at least once to confirm the results.

Statistical analysis

The correlation between the methylation status and the clinicopathological characteristics was analysed using a chisquare test for categorical variables. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. A logistic regression test was conducted to estimate the relationship between methylation and the covariates, namely, age, gender, smoking status, histology, and pathological stage. The overall survival (OS) of NSCLC patients according to methylation status of the TGFBI gene were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using Cox proportional hazard model. All analyses were performed using the Statistical Analysis System for Windows, version 9.4 (SAS Institute, USA).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Methylation status and expression of TGFBI gene in NSCLC samples

We analysed the methylation status of the human TGFBI gene in 138 primary NSCLCs and corresponding nonmalignant lung tissues using MSP. Considering that promoter hypermethylation is usually associated with the functional silencing of tumour associated genes in cancer cells, we designed the MSP primers to span the 5′-untranslated region of the first exon (–54 to +75 relative to the translation start site). The target-specific primer set yielded a 128-bp single band of the expected size. Representative results of the MSP analyses are shown in Fig. 1A. Unmethylated bands were detected in all non-malignant and malignant tissues (200N, 200T, 205N, 205T, 246N, 246T, 256N, and 256T), thereby confirming the integrity of the DNA. Sequencing of the representative PCR products confirmed their methylation status and verified that all cytosines at non-CpG sites were converted to thymine (data not shown), thereby eliminating the possibility of incomplete bisulfite conversion. TGFBI promoter methylation was detected in 25 (18.1%) tumour tissues (205T and 246T) and eight (5.8%) matched non-tumour samples (205N) (P = 0.003), consistent with a previous observation that 16% (8/50) of lung cancer samples were methylated at the P5/P6 loci of TGFBI (Shah et al., 2008). Methylation of non-malignant lung tissues mostly concurred in the matching cancer tissues with methylated bands (data not shown), which could be caused by either premalignant changes in peritumoral normal tissue or contamination of non-malignant tissues with methylated cancer cells. Thus, the above results suggest that hypermethylation of the TGFBI promoter may be associated with pathogenesis of NSCLC.

E1BJB7_2019_v42n2_161_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. Representative results of MSP and RT-PCR analyses of NSCLC tissue samples (A) and cell lines (B). Methylation status and expression of the TGFBI gene were analysed via MSP and RT-PCR analyses, respectively. (A) Tumour tissues and matched non-malignant lung tissue specimens showed methylated (205N, 205T, and 246T) or unmethylated alleles (200N, 200T, 205N, 205T, 246N, 246T, 256N, and 256T). CpGenomeTM Universal methylated and unmethylated DNA was used as positive control for the methylated and unmethylated products, respectively. Distilled water was used as negative control. N, non-malignant tissue; T, tumor tissues; U and M, amplified products using primers targeting unmethylated or methylated sequences. TGFBI mRNAs were markedly decreased in 205N, 205T, and 246T tissues with methylated promoter. GAPDH was used as an internal loading control. (B) (–) indicated vehicle alone treatment and (+) indicated 20 μM 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine (5-AzadC) treatment for 3 days.

We investigated whether methylation of the TGFBI promoter is correlated with gene silencing in both clinical tumour samples and tumour cell lines. Compared to unmethylated tissues, TGFBI expression levels were markedly downregulated in tumour and normal lung tissues (205N, 205T, and 246T) that are methylated in the TGFBI promoter (Fig. 1A). Similar results were confirmed by 5-AzadC experiments, exhibiting that methylated alleles disappeared in H522 cells and TGFBI mRNA was induced after treatment with the demethylating agent 5-AzadC for 3 days (Fig. 1B). Our results agree with those of recent studies demonstrating the correlation between promoter hypermethylation and significant downregulation of TGFBI expression in human cancer cells (Fang et al., 2014). Therefore, the above results indicated that CGI methylation is a key mechanism responsible for TGFBI downregulation.

Association of TGFBI methylation with clinicopathological parameters and clinical outcomes

Our results showed that TGFBI methylation was more frequent in patients with lymph node metastasis than in those without metastasis with a borderline significance (28.6% vs 14.6%, P = 0.06) (Table 1). However, no significant association was found in other clinicopathological factors, such as age, sex, smoking status, histology, TP53 mutation, tumour status, pathological stage, and death (Table 1). Especially, TGFBI methylation was significantly correlated to death in ADC patients (Supplementary Table S1).

The median follow-up duration of the 138 NSCLC patients was 30.3 months (range, 3.2 to 97.8 months). Thirty eight patients (27.5%) died from cancer progression during the follow-up period and among them, twenty seven patients were ADC. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that TGFBI methylation was significantly associated with worse OS in ADC patients but not in total patients (log-rank P [PL-R] = 0.024 and, 0.080 respectively) (Fig. 2). Moreover, the above results were confirmed by Cox proportional hazard regression model (HR = 2.88, 95% CI = 1.19-6.99, P = 0.019) (Table 2). Therefore, TGFBI methylation in tumour samples could serve as an independent prognostic predictor of ADC patients.

E1BJB7_2019_v42n2_161_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. Association of TGFBI methylation with poor prognosis of NSCLC patients. Kaplan-Meier survival curve of total and adenocarcinoma patients according to TGFBI methylation status. P-values from log-rank test.

E1BJB7_2019_v42n2_161_t0002.png 이미지

Table 2. Association between TGFBI methylation and overall survival in NSCLC patients

PL-R, P-values from log-rank test.

Hazard rates (HR), Confidence interval (CI).

aAdjusted variables include age, smoking status, histology, TP53, and disease stage.

bAdjusted variables include age, smoking status, TP53, and disease stage.

Accumulating evidence has indicated that TGF-β signalling plays a dual role as a tumour suppressor in premalignant states and as a tumour promoter in advanced cancers (Massague, 2012). In addition, TGFBI, a downstream component of the TGF-β signalling pathway, has been shown to promote and/or inhibit cancer (Ween et al., 2012; Yokobori & Nishiyama, 2017). Moreover, the exact role of TGFBI and its expression patterns in NSCLC remain to be determined (Kim et al., 2003; Sasaki et al., 2002; Shin et al., 2012; Wen et al., 2011; Zhao et al., 2006). TGFBI is a secreted ECM protein that can function not only as a barrier for preventing the spread of tumour cells, but also as a reservoir for cell-binding proteins and growth factors that influence tumour cell behaviour (Thapa et al., 2007). Results of the current study showed that TGFBI methylation tended to occur in patient with lymph node metastasis and was significantly associated with poor survival outcomes in ADC patients, thereby suggesting that TGFBI acts as a tumour suppressor gene rather than an oncogene in NSCLC by regulating tumour metastasis. Recently, Wen et al. have demonstrated that TGFBI could function as an anti-metastatic protein in lung tumour cells. In addition, ectopic expression of TGFBI was found to stimulate cell adhesion and cytoskeleton formation by activating adhesion-associated signalling, inhibiting anchorage-independent growth activation, and inhibiting the activities of matrix metalloproteinases. Similarly, TGFBI-mediated apoptosis induction was found to be associated with improved response to chemotherapy in NSCLC (Irigoyen et al., 2010; Pajares et al., 2014). Taken together, our findings highlighted the anti-tumour role of the TGFBI gene in NSCLC and provided new diagnostic and therapeutic modalities for the clinical management of lung cancer.

Limitations of the present study include its retrospective design and relatively small sample size. Thus, the results were potentially influenced by selection bias. A major finding of this study is that epigenetic inactivation of TGFBI could serve as a useful predictor of a poor prognosis in ADC patients. However, further large-scale studies and longer follow-up periods are needed to verify the clinical significance of TGFBI.

Note: Supplementary information is available on the Molecules and Cells website (www.molcells.org).

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by Biomedical Research Institute grant, Kyungpook National University Hospital (2017).

References

  1. Choi, J.E., Kim, D.S., Kim, E.J., Chae, M.H., Cha, S.I., Kim, C.H., Jheon, S., Jung, T.H., and Park, J.Y. (2008). Aberrant methyaltion of ADAMTS1 in non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Genet. 187, 80-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2008.08.001
  2. Fang, H., Liu, J., Guo, D., Liu, P., and Zhao, Y. (2014). Epigenetic regulation of putative tumor suppressor TGFBI in human leukemias. Chin. Med. J. 127, 1645-1650. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0366-6999.20133015
  3. Irigoyen, M., Pajares, M.J., Agorreta, J., Ponz-Sarvise, M., Salvo, E., Lozano, M.D., Pio, R., Gil-Bazo, I., and Rouzaut, A. (2010). TGFBI expression is associated with a better response to chemotherapy in NSCLC. Mol. Cancer 9, 130-141. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-4598-9-130
  4. Kang, S., Dong, S.M., and Park, N.H. (2010). Frequent promoter hypermethylation of TGFBI in epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 118, 58-63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.03.025
  5. Kim, D.S., Kim, M.J., Lee, J.Y., Kim, Y.Z., Kim, E.J., and Park J.Y. (2007). Aberrant methyaltion of E-cadherin and H-cadherin genes in nonsmall cell lung cancer and its relation to clinocopathologic features. Cancer 110, 2789-2792.
  6. Kim, J.E., Kim, S.J., Jeong, H.W., Lee, B.H., Choi, J.Y., Park, R.W., Park, J.Y., and Kim, I.S. (2003). RGD peptides released from betaig-h3, a TGF-beta-induced cell-adhesive molecule, mediate apoptosis. Oncogene 22, 2045-2053. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1206269
  7. Kim, Y.H., Lee, W.K., Lee, E.B., Son, J.W., Kim, D.S., and Park, J.Y. (2017). Combined effect of metastasis-related microRNA, miR-34 and miR124 family, methylation on prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer. Clin. Lung Cancer 18, e13-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2016.06.005
  8. Lu, F., and Zhang, H.T. (2011). DNA methylation and nonsmall cell lung cancer. Anat. Rec. (Hoboken) 294, 1787-1795. https://doi.org/10.1002/ar.21471
  9. Massague, J. (2012). TGF-${\beta}$ signaling in context. Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 13, 616-630. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm3434
  10. Pajares, M.J., Agorreta, J., Salvo, E., Behrens, C., Wistuba, I.I., Montuenga, L.M., Pio, R., and Rouzaut, A. (2014). TGFBI expression is an independent predictor of survival in adjuvant-treated lung squamous cell carcinoma patients. Br. J. Cancer 110, 1545-1551. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.33
  11. Sasaki, H., Kobayashi, Y., Nakashima, Y., Moriyama, S., Yukiue, H., Kaji, M., Kiriyama, M., Fukai, I., Yamakawa, Y., and Fujii, Y. (2002). ${\beta}IGH3$, a TGF-${\beta}$ inducible gene, is overexprssed in lung cancer. Jpn. J. Clin. Oncol. 32, 85-89. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyf021
  12. Sato, M., Shames, D.S., Gazdar, A.F., and Minna, J.D. (2007). A translation view of the molecular pathogenesis of lung cancer. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2, 327-343. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.JTO.0000263718.69320.4c
  13. Shah, J.N., Shao, G., Hei, T.K., and Zhao, Y. (2008). Methylation screening of the TGFBI promoter in human lung and prostate cancer by methylation-specific PCR. BMC Cancer 8, 284-294. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-8-284
  14. Shao, G., Berenguer, J., Borczuk, A.C., Powell, C.A., Hei, T.K., and Zhao Y. (2006). Epigenetic inactivation of betaig-h3 gene in human cancer cells. Cancer Res. 66, 4566-4573. https://doi.org/10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-2130
  15. Shin S.H., Kim J., Heo S.C., Kwon Y.W., Kim Y.M., Kim I.S., Lee T.G. and Kim J.H. (2012). Proteomic identification of betaig-h3 as a lysophosphatidic acid-induced secreted protein of human mesenchymal stem cells: paracrine activation of A549 lung adenocarcinoma cells by betaig-h3. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 11, M111.012385. https://doi.org/10.1074/mcp.M111.012385
  16. Siegel, R., Ma, J., Zou, Z., and Jemal, A. (2014). Cancer statistics 2014. CA Cancer J. Clin. 65, 9-29. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21208
  17. Spiro, S.G., and Silvestri, G.A. (2005). One hundred years of lung cancer. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 172, 523-529. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200504-531OE
  18. Thapa, N., Lee, B.H., and Kim, I.S. (2007). TGFBI/betaig-h3 protein: A versatile matrix molecule induced by TGF-beta. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 39, 2183-2194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2007.06.004
  19. Ween, M.P., Oehler, M.K., and Ricciardelli, C. (2012). Transforming growth Factor-Beta-Induced Protein (TGFBI)/(${\beta}$ig-H3): a matrix protein with dual functions in ovarian cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 13, 10461-10477. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms130810461
  20. Wen, G., Partridge, M.A., Li, B., Hong, M., Liao, W., Cheng, S.K., Zhao, Y., Calaf, G.M., Liu, T., Zhou J., et al. (2011). TGFBI expression reduces in vitro and in vivo metastatic potential of lung and breast tumor cells. Cancer Lett. 308, 25-32.
  21. Yano, T., Haro, A., Shikada, Y., Maruyama, R., and Maehara, Y. (2011). Non-small cell lung cancer in never smokers as a representative 'non-smoking-associated lung cancer': epidemiology and clinical features. Int. J. Clin. Oncol. 16, 287-293. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-010-0160-8
  22. Yokobori, T., and Nishiyama, M. (2017). TGF-${\beta}$ signaling in gastrointestinal cancers: progress in basic and clinical research. J. Clin. Med. 6, 11-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm6010011
  23. Zhao, Y., El-Gabry, M., and Hei, T.K. (2006). Loss of Betaig-h3 protein is frequent in primary lung carcinoma and related to tumorigenic phenotype in lung cancer cells. Mol. Carcinog. 45, 84-92. https://doi.org/10.1002/mc.20167
  24. Zhou, W., and Christiani, D.C. (2011). East meets West: ethnic differences in epidemiology and clinical behaviors of lung cancer between East Asians and Caucasians. Chin. J. Cancer 30, 287-292. https://doi.org/10.5732/cjc.011.10106

Cited by

  1. Prognostic value of Iroquois homeobox 1 methylation in non-small cell lung cancers vol.42, pp.5, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1007/s13258-020-00925-9
  2. Identification of key genes associated with papillary thyroid microcarcinoma characteristics by integrating transcriptome sequencing and weighted gene co-expression network analysis vol.811, 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gene.2021.146086