DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Classification of Characters in Movie by Correlation Analysis of Genre and Linguistic Style

  • 투고 : 2018.11.29
  • 심사 : 2018.12.13
  • 발행 : 2019.01.31

초록

The character dialogue created by AI is unnatural when compared with human-made dialogue, and it can not reveal the character's personality properly in spite of remarkable development of AI. The purpose of this paper is to classify characters through the linguistic style and to investigate the relation of the specific linguistic style with the personality. We analyzed the dialogues of 92 characters selected from total 60 movies categorized four movie genres, such as romantic comedy, action, comedy and horror/thriller, using Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC), a text analysis software. As a result, we confirmed that there is a unique language style according to genre. Especially, we could find that the emotional tone than analytical thinking are two important features to classify. They were analyzed as very important features for classification as the precision and recall is over 78% for romantic comedy and action. However, the precision and recall were 66% and 50% for comedy and horror/thriller. Their impact on classification was less than romantic comedy and action genre. The characters of romantic comedy deal with the affection between men and women using a very high value of emotional tone than analytical thinking. The characters of action genre who need rational judgment to perform mission have much greater analytical thinking than emotional tone. Additionally, in the case of comedy and horror/thriller, we analyzed that they have many kinds of characters and that characters often change their personalities in the story.

키워드

CPTSCQ_2019_v24n1_49_f0001.png 이미지

Fig. 1. The dialogue of the character ‘Gigi’ in the script of Movie

CPTSCQ_2019_v24n1_49_f0002.png 이미지

Fig. 2. The dialogue of the main character ‘Summer’ of the movie <500 Days of Summer>

CPTSCQ_2019_v24n1_49_f0003.png 이미지

Fig. 3. Value of features for character dialogue

CPTSCQ_2019_v24n1_49_f0004.png 이미지

Fig. 4. T-test results for 93 features

CPTSCQ_2019_v24n1_49_f0005.png 이미지

Fig. 5. Scatter plot of ‘Tone’ and ‘Analytic’

CPTSCQ_2019_v24n1_49_f0006.png 이미지

Fig. 6. KNN(k=9) classification for ‘Analytic’ and ‘Tone’

Table 1. Selected movie characters

CPTSCQ_2019_v24n1_49_t0001.png 이미지

Table 2. LIWC features and words in each feature

CPTSCQ_2019_v24n1_49_t0002.png 이미지

Table 3. Six hypotheses for four genres

CPTSCQ_2019_v24n1_49_t0003.png 이미지

Table 4. Experimental result of classification

CPTSCQ_2019_v24n1_49_t0004.png 이미지

참고문헌

  1. Li, B. and Riedl, M. O., "Scheherazade: Crowd-Powered Interactive Narrative Generation," Proc. of the 29th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 4305-4306, 2015.
  2. https://twitter.com/shelley_ai
  3. http://benjamin-ai.tumblr.com/
  4. Vasse, C., "The Dialogue," Ewha Womans University Press, p. 19, 2010.
  5. Chung, Young Kwon, "Understanding Movie Genres," Amormundi, p. 27, 2017.
  6. Galton, F., "Measurement of character," Fortnightly Review, 36, pp. 179-185, 1884.
  7. Allport, G. W. and Odbert, H. S., "Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study," Psychological monographs, Vol. 47, No.1, pp. i-171, 1936. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093360
  8. Gill, A. and Oberlander, J., "Taking care of the linguistic features of extroversion," Proc. of the 24th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 363-368, 2002.
  9. Mehl, M, R., Gosling, S. D., and Pennebaker, J. W., "Personality in its natural habitat: Manifestations and implicit folk theories of personality in daily life," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 90, pp. 862-877, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.5.862
  10. Pennebaker, James W., and Laura A. King., "Linguistic styles: Language use as an individual difference," Journal of personality and social psychology, Vol. 77, pp. 1296-1312, 1999. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1296
  11. Pennebaker, James W., "The secret life of pronouns: What our words say about us," Sa-i Book Publishing, p. 9, 2016.
  12. Beukeboom, C. J., Tanis, M., and Vermeulen, I. E., "The language of extraversion: Extraverted people talk more abstractly, introverts are more concrete," Journal of Language and Social Psychology, Vol. 32, pp. 191-201, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X12460844
  13. https://nlds.soe.ucsc.edu/node/23/done?sid=4863&token=6c19f764f110e75e129fab4e4dd683d9
  14. Pennebaker, J. W., Boyd, R. L., Jordan, K., and Blackburn, K., "The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2015," LIWC2015 Development Manual, pp. 1-25, 2015.
  15. Krutnik, F., and Neale, S., "Popular film and television comedy," Communication Books, p.60, 2002.