DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The Study of Human Rights Sensitivity and the Types of Perception in regards to Human Rights for College Students

대학생의 인권감수성 수준과 인권인식 유형에 관한 연구

  • Received : 2018.07.20
  • Accepted : 2018.10.05
  • Published : 2018.10.31

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the level of human rights sensitivity and the types of perception in regards to the human rights of college students to enhance their human rights sensitivity. The study methodology included a t-test and variance analysis for the level of human rights sensitivity, and a Q-factor analysis for the perception types of human rights. As a result of examining whether there is a difference in human right sensitivity, it was found that female students were higher than male students, and juniors and seniors were higher than freshmen and sophomores. The human rights sensitivity of the students in the social and science department were the highest, and those who had volunteer experiences were more susceptible to human rights than those who did not. Students who registered for organ donation were higher than those who did not, and those who received human rights education showed higher human rights susceptibility than those who did not. Four perception types of human rights were analyzed 'universal social moralists', those who have an idealistic mindset and make decisions based on moral standards, 'practical realists', those who have no intention of breaking out of the social norm and who do not want to take any risks for human rights, 'social system advocates', those who have a clear understanding of the basic human rights concept, but don't think that they should break the rules of society for the sake of individual rights, and 'social contracts advocates', those who are willing to bend the rules of society for human rights, but not to the extent of ruining relationships. These study results are expected to contribute to the possibility of the social viewpoint that human rights sensitivity can be developed in the context of social experience as well as perception.

본 연구는 대학생의 인권감수성을 향상시키기 위해 인권감수성 수준과 인권인식 유형을 살펴보는데 있다. 연구방법은 인권감수성 수준을 파악하기 위해서는 설문지 자료를 활용하여 t검증과 분산분석을 실시하였고, 인권인식 유형을 살펴보기 위해서는 Q방법론을 통한 Q요인분석을 실시하였다. 연구결과, 인권감수성의 수준은 3학년과 4학년이 1학년과 2학년보다 높았고, 종교별로는 기독교가 높은 것으로 나타났다. 단과대학별에서는 사회과학대학 학생들이 가장 높은 인권감수성을 보여주었으며, 봉사를 한 학생들이 봉사교육을 실시하지 않은 학생들보다 인권감수성이 높은 것으로 나타났다. 장기기증 등록을 한 학생들이 하지 않은 학생들에 비해, 인권교육을 받은 학생들이 받지 않은 학생들보다 인권감수성이 높은 것으로 나타났다. 인권인식 유형과 관련해서는 총 4개의 유형으로 구분되었고, 유형 1은 인권에 대한 이상적인 개념을 지니고 있으며 도덕적 판단을 중심으로 생각하는 특성을 보이는 '보편적인 사회윤리형', 유형 2는 사회적 규범을 벗어날 생각이 없고 삶 속에서 인권으로 인해 실리적인 혜택을 박탈당하기를 원하지 않는 '실리적 현실형', 유형 3은 기본적인 인권에 대한 개념을 지니고 있고 개인의 권리를 위해서 사회의 규범을 어겨서는 안 된다고 생각하는 '사회체제 유지형', 유형 4는 인권을 지키기 위해서는 기존의 사회적 규범을 벗어나 행동하지만, 그 행동이 사람들과 관계를 배제하는 것은 아님을 보려주는 '개인권리보호의 사회계약형'으로 나타났다. 본 연구의 결과가 인권에 대한 개인의 맥락에서의 인지적 교육에만 구한되지 않고 개인의 삶과 연결될 수 있는 사회적인 관점의 가능성을 찾는데 기여하기를 기대한다.

Keywords

References

  1. Y. L. Moon, M. H. Moon, Y J. Guak, "Developing indicators of psychological scale for human righis sensitivity in Korea", University of Seoul, National Human Rights Commission, 2002.
  2. B. S. Hong, Y. A. AH, "The Influence of Human Right Sensitivity on School Violence Behavior among Adolescents", Journal of School Social Work, Vol.23, pp.307-335, 2012.
  3. Y. J. Chom "A Study on the relationship between Human Righrs Sensitivity and Tendency to Support For Human Rights in Practice : The case of High School in the Kyonggi region", University of Kyung Hee, 2006.
  4. Kohlberg. L. "The Philosophy of Moral Development", New York : Haper & Row. 1981.
  5. Y. S. Lee, "A Path Analysis between right Sensitivity of Social Workers and Case Advocacy, Job Satisfaction, Organizational Commitment, and Turnover Intention", University of Kyonggi, 2016.
  6. H. Park, "Human Rights Sensitivity of Undergraduates in Social Welfare Classes : Focused on Adult Leamer in On-line university", The Journal of the Korea Contents Association, Vol.13, No8, pp191-200, 2013. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5392/JKCA.2013.13.08.191
  7. Y. J. Kim, K. J. Cho, "A Study on the Educational Effects of a Human Rights Course on Adult Learners' Human Rights Sensitivity in an on-line University", The Journal of Educational Research, Vol.15, No.1, pp.27-53, 2017.
  8. J. J. Kim, "Study on the Factors affecting the Social Workers' Perception on Human Rights in The Residential Homes of the Disabled" University of Gongju, 2011.
  9. H. J. Kim, "Analysis about the Perception Gap on the Human Rights Status Quo in Social Workers", Journal of Community Welfare, Vol.34, pp.109-132, 2010.
  10. National Human Rights commission, "A Study on the Development of Human Rights-friendly University culture", 2009.
  11. National Human Rights commission, "An Exposition of Human Rights", 2011.
  12. J. O. Park, "A study on Human Rights sensitivity and Human Rights awareness among college students", Chung-Ang University, 2014.
  13. H. K. Kim, S. J. OH, "The Psychological Typologies among Social Network Service Users : Toward the Possibility of New Communication", Journal of Korean Society for the Scientific Study of Subjectivity, Vol.22, pp.161-177, 2011.
  14. S. E. Kim, "Ethical Values and Human Rights Sensitivity in Nursing Students", Korea Journal of Healthcare Ethics, Vol.18, No.2, pp.117-128, 2015.
  15. S. Y. Jung, "A Study on the Human Rights Sensitivity of Professionals in the Mental Hospital", Mental Health & Social Work, Vol.23, pp.59-87, 2006.
  16. H. G. Kim, S. Y. Kim, "A Study on the Effect of the Experiential Legislative Activity Class upon youth' Human Rights Consciousness", Theory and Research in Citizenship Education, Vol.47, No.4, pp.37-62, 2015.