Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology

  • 제28권10호
  • /
  • Pages.1700-1705
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1017-7825(pISSN)
  • /
  • 1738-8872(eISSN)
한국미생물·생명공학회 (The Korean Society for Microbiology and Biotechnology)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Effects of Sampling Techniques and Sites on Rumen Microbiome and Fermentation Parameters in Hanwoo Steers

  • Song, Jaeyong (Animal Nutrition and Physiology Team, National Institute of Animal science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Choi, Hyuck (Animal Nutrition and Physiology Team, National Institute of Animal science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Jeong, Jin Young (Animal Nutrition and Physiology Team, National Institute of Animal science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Lee, Seul (Animal Nutrition and Physiology Team, National Institute of Animal science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Lee, Hyun Jung (Animal Nutrition and Physiology Team, National Institute of Animal science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Baek, Youlchang (Animal Nutrition and Physiology Team, National Institute of Animal science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Ji, Sang Yun (Animal Nutrition and Physiology Team, National Institute of Animal science, Rural Development Administration) ;
  • Kim, Minseok (Animal Nutrition and Physiology Team, National Institute of Animal science, Rural Development Administration)
  • 투고 : 2018.03.05
  • 심사 : 2018.04.16
  • 발행 : 2018.10.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

We evaluated the influence of sampling technique (cannulation vs. stomach tube) and site (dorsal sac vs. ventral sac) on the rumen microbiome and fermentation parameters in Hanwoo steers. Rumen samples were collected from three cannulated Hanwoo steers via both a stomach tube and cannulation, and 16S rRNA gene amplicons were sequenced on the MiSeq platform to investigate the rumen microbiome composition among samples obtained via 1) the stomach tube, 2) dorsal sac via rumen cannulation, and 3) ventral sac via rumen cannulation. A total of 722,001 high-quality 16S rRNA gene sequences were obtained from the three groups and subjected to phylogenetic analysis. There was no significant difference in the composition of the major taxa or alpha diversity among the three groups (p>0.05). Bacteroidetes and Firmicutes represented the first and second most dominant phyla, respectively, and their abundances did not differ among the three groups (p>0.05). Beta diversity principal coordinate analysis also did not separate the rumen microbiome based on the three sample groups. Moreover, there was no effect of sampling site or method on fermentation parameters, including pH and volatile fatty acids (p>0.05). Overall, this study demonstrates that the rumen microbiome and fermentation parameters are not affected by different sampling techniques and sampling sites. Therefore, a stomach tube can be a feasible alternative method to collect representative rumen samples rather than the standard and more invasive method of rumen cannulation in Hanwoo steers.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Kim M, Morrison M, Yu Z. 2011. Status of the phy logenetic diversity census of ruminal microbiomes. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 76: 49-63. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.01029.x
  2. Laflin SL, Gnad DP. 2008. Rumen cannulation: procedure and use of a cannulated bovine. Vet. Clin. North Am. Food Anim. Pract. 24: 335-340.
  3. Lodge-Ivey SL, Browne-Silva J, Horvath MB. 2009. Technical note: bacterial diversity and fermentation end products in rumen fluid samples collected via oral lavage or rumen cannula. J. Anim. Sci. 87: 2333-2337. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2008-1472
  4. Terre M, Castells L, Fabregas F, Bach A. 2013. Short communication: comparison of pH, volatile fatty acids, and microbiome of rumen samples from preweaned calves obtained via cannula or stomach tube. J. Dairy Sci. 96: 5290-5294. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5921
  5. Ramos-Morales E, Arco-Perez A, Martin-Garcia AI, Yanez-Ruiz DR, Frutos P, Hervas G. 2014. Use of stomach tubing as an alternative to rumen cannulation to study ruminal fermentation and microbiota in sheep and goats. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 198: 57-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2014.09.016
  6. Paz HA, Anderson CL, Muller MJ, Kononoff PJ, Fernando SC. 2016. Rumen bacterial community composition in Holstein and Jersey cows is different under same dietary condition and is not affected by sampling method. Front. Microbiol. 7: 1206.
  7. Shen JS, Chai Z, Song LJ, Liu JX, Wu YM. 2012. Insertion depth of oral stomach tubes may affect the fermentation parameters of ruminal fluid collected in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 95: 5978-5984. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2012-5499
  8. Geishauser T, Gitzel A. 1996. A comparison of rumen fluid sampled by oro-ruminal probe versus rumen fistula. Small Ruminant Res. 21: 63-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/0921-4488(95)00810-1
  9. Duffield T, Plaizier JC, Fairfield A, Bagg R, Vessie G, Dick P, et al. 2004. Comparison of techniques for measurement of rumen pH in lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 87: 59-66. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(04)73142-2
  10. Yu Z, Morrison M. 2004. Improved extraction of PCR-quality community DNA from digesta and fecal samples. Biotechniques 36: 808-812. https://doi.org/10.2144/04365ST04
  11. Herlemann DP, Labrenz M, Jurgens K, Bertilsson S, Waniek JJ, Andersson AF. 2011. Transitions in bacterial communities along the 2000 km salinity gradient of the Baltic Sea. ISME J. 5: 1571-1579. https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2011.41
  12. Magoc M, Salzberg S. 2011. FLASH: Fast length adjustment of short reads to improve genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 27: 2957-2963. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr507
  13. Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, et al. 2010. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods 7: 335-336. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.f.303
  14. Haas BJ, Gevers D, Earl AM, Feldgarden M, Ward DV, Giannoukos G, et al. 2011. Chimeric 16S rRNA sequence formation and detection in Sanger and 454-pyrosequenced PCR amplicons. Genome Res. 21: 494-504. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.112730.110
  15. DeSantis TZ, Hugenholtz P, Larsen N, Rojas M, Brodie EL, Keller K, et al. 2006. Greengenes, a chimerachecked 16S rRNA gene database and workbench compatible with ARB. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72: 5069-5072. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.03006-05
  16. Edgar RC. 2010. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26: 2460-2461. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461
  17. Price MN, Dehal PS, Arkin AP. 2010. FastTree 2 - Approximately maximum-likihood trees for large alignments. PLoS One 5: e9490. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0009490
  18. Erwin ES, Marco GJ, Emery EM. 1961. Volatile fatty acid analyses of blood and rumen fluid by gas chromatography. J. Dairy Sci. 44: 1768-1771. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(61)89956-6
  19. Benson AK, Kelly SA, Legge R, Ma FR, Low SJ, Kim J, et al. 2010. Individuality in gut microbiota composition is a complex polygenic trait shaped by multiple environmental and host genetic factors. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107: 18933-18938. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1007028107

피인용 문헌

  1. Rumen and Fecal Microbial Community Structure of Holstein and Jersey Dairy Cows as Affected by Breed, Diet, and Residual Feed Intake vol.9, pp.8, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani9080498
  2. Comparison of Two Sampling Techniques for Evaluating Ruminal Fermentation and Microbiota in the Planktonic Phase of Rumen Digesta in Dairy Cows vol.11, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.618032
  3. The impact of short-term acute heat stress on the rumen microbiome of Hanwoo steers vol.62, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.5187/jast.2020.62.2.208
  4. The Destruction of the Anaerobic Environment Caused by Rumen Fistula Surgery Leads to Differences in the Rumen Microbial Diversity and Function of Sheep vol.8, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.754195
  5. Rumen metaproteomics: Closer to linking rumen microbial function to animal productivity traits vol.186, pp.None, 2021, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2020.07.011
  6. Ruminal Fistulation and Cannulation: A Necessary Procedure for the Advancement of Biotechnological Research in Ruminants vol.11, pp.7, 2018, https://doi.org/10.3390/ani11071870
  7. Effect of cyanide-degrading bacteria inoculation on performance, rumen fermentation characteristics of sheep fed bitter cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) leaf meal vol.66, pp.2, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aoas.2021.09.001