디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제16권10호
  • /
  • Pages.169-178
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Fuzzy-IPA분석을 활용한 경인항 운영 활성화에 대한 연구

A Study on the Operational Activation strategies of Gyeongin Port Using Fuzzy-IPA

  • 박종민 (인천대학교 동북아물류대학원) ;
  • 양태현 (인천대학교 동북아물류대학원) ;
  • 박성훈 (인천대학교 동북아물류대학원) ;
  • 여기태 (인천대학교 동북아물류대학원)
  • Park, Jong-Min (Graduate School of Logistics, Incheon National University) ;
  • Yang, Tae-Hyeon (Graduate School of Logistics, Incheon National University) ;
  • Park, Sung-Hoon (Graduate School of Logistics, Incheon National University) ;
  • Yeo, Gi-Tae (Graduate School of Logistics, Incheon National University)
  • 투고 : 2018.08.10
  • 심사 : 2018.10.20
  • 발행 : 2018.10.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

경인항은 국가관리 무역항임에도 불구하고 인지도, 항만 배후 인프라가 부족하며, 주변항에 비해 경쟁력을 갖추고 있지 못하다. 이에 본 연구에서는 경인항의 활성화를 위한 전략적 개선방안을 제시하기 위해 경인항을 이용 중인 화주사의 인식을 반영한 Fuzzy-IPA분석을 실시하였다. 이를 통해 향후 경인항 운영활성화를 위한 실증적인 개선방안을 제시하고자 했다. 분석결과 최우선 투자영역에 비용적인 측면의 요인인 하역보관 비용, 항만시설 사용료, 인센티브 및 지원 등 3개 요인이 도출되었다. 유지강화 영역에는 화물 안전성, 인프라 설비, 내륙운송비 3개의 요인이 도출되었으며, 현상유지 영역과 점진적 개선영역에서는 화물처리에 관련된 요인과 서비스 요인이 도출되었다. 본 연구는 경인항을 이용하는 화주사를 대상으로 계량화 방법을 사용하여 인식을 분석하였으며, 이를 바탕으로 실증적 활성화 방안을 제시하였다. 향후 연구에서는 선박의 기항빈도, 항로 다변화 방안 등을 추가하여 분석에 반영할 필요가 있다.

Gyeongin Port has low awareness, insufficient hinterland infrastructures, and lower competitiveness. So, in this study, we conducted Fuzzy-IPA analysis reflecting the recognition of the consignor companies that are using Gyeongin port to suggest present practical improvement measures for the activation of the operation of Gyeongin port hereafter. As a result of the analysis, three factors, that is, cargo loading/unloading/storage costs, port facility fees, and incentive and support were derived as priority investment areas. Three factors, that is, cargo safety, infrastructure equipment, and inland transportation costs were derived as the areas for maintenance strengthening and factors related to cargo handling and service factors were derived as areas for maintenance of the status quo and areas for gradual improvement, respectively. This study is significant in that it analyzed the recognition of the consignor companies that are using Gyeongin port using a quantifying method and suggested realizable measures for activation based on the results of the analysis. In future studies, the frequency of ships' calling at the port and measures to diversify the sea routes should be additionally reflected on the analysis.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. J. J. Su. (2016). 2016-2020 The 3rd National Port Basic Plan Revision Plan. Sejong : Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries.
  2. J. K. Lee & G. T. Yeo. (2015). An Analysis of the Port Competition Structure: Focusing on Import and Export Items of Ports in Western Coast Region. Journal of Korea Port Economic Association, 31(4), 265-278.
  3. C. H. LEE & I. S. Sun. (2017). A Review for Development Strategy od Gyeongin Port. Journal of Digital Convergence, 33(3), 139-154.
  4. C. H. Lee & T. W. Chung. (2013). A Study on an Analysis of the Importance of the Selection Factors for the Location of the Gyeong-in Ara Waterway Gimpo Gochon Logistics Complex. Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 77, 255-273.
  5. T. H. Lee, G. S. Jo, H. J. Jung & G. T. Yeo. (2013). Kyungin Port's customers' needs analysis using Importance-Performance Analysis. Korea Logistics Review, 79, 741-763.
  6. Y. T. Lim, C. H. Park & C. H. Chang. (2013). Strategic Planning for Increasing the Capital Ports' Global Competitiveness. Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 78, 435-456.
  7. J. A. Park & M. S. Park. (2007). The Study on Port Selection Factors for Activation of Port - In the case of Mokpo Port. Journal of Maritime Business, 10, 119-139.
  8. J. S. Jung. (2015). Strategies for Masan Port to Attract Exporters: based on Analysis of Factors Determining Port Choice. Korea Logistics Review, 25(1), 1-15.
  9. K. Y. Oh, K. S. Choi & C. S. Kim. (2009). A study on the selection factors of small-medium sized port. Korea Logistics Review, 19(5), 81-102.
  10. N. W. Park. K. H. Chi & C. J. Chung. (2003). GIS-based Data-driven Geological Data Integration using Fuzzy Logic: Theory and Application. Economic and Environmental Geology, 36(3), 243-255.
  11. C. B. Lee & J. M. Lee. (2003). A Study on Changes in Competitive Factors : focused on Asia Neighbor ports. Journal Of Korea Port Economic Association, 19(1), 43-68.
  12. Y. S. Jung. (2015). An Efficiency Management Scheme using Big Data of Healthcare Patients using Fuzzy AHP. Journal of Digital Convergence, 13(3), 227-233.
  13. U. J. Chang, J. H. Nam & K. B. Kim. (2003). A Study on Learning Evaluation Method by Using Fuzzy Theory. Journal of The Korea Institute of Information and Communication Engineering, 7(5), 853-862.
  14. L. A. Zadeh. (1973). Outline of a new approach to the analysis od complex systems and decision processes. IEEE Transactions on system, Man, and Cybernetics, 1, 28-44.
  15. L. A. Zadeh. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338-353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
  16. J. A. Martilla & J. C. James. (1977). Importance-Performance Analysis. Journal of Marketing, 41(1), 77-79. https://doi.org/10.2307/1250495
  17. H. J. Kim & J. M. Lee. (2017). A Study on the Recognition of Swimsuit Brand Image Using IPA Technique. Journal of Digital Convergence, 15(3), 467-477.
  18. D. G. Kwon. (2011). The Study on the plan of improving the service quality in the food industry by the IPA matrix. International Journal of Tourism and Hospitality Research, 26(1), 1-31.
  19. S. M. Jo & H. G. Jo. (2013). A Study on Post-Office Member's Recognition of Competency by IPA(Importance-Performance Analysis. Journal of Human Resource Management Research, 20(2), 55-76.
  20. S. H. Choe. (2008). Empirical Analysis of the Determinants for Shippers' Selection of Gwangyang Port. Journal of Korea port economic association, 24(4), 199-217.
  21. J. L. Tongzon. (2009). Port choice and freight forwarders. Transportation Research. Part E, 45(1), 186-195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2008.02.004
  22. S. H. Jo, S. H. Park & G. T. Yeo. (2018). A Study on the Port Selection for Capital Area Cargoes Using Conjoint Analysis-Focusing on Jeju S Mineral water. Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 98, 1-24.
  23. M. Malchow & A. Kanafani. (2001). A disaggregate analysis of factors influencing a port's attractiveness. Maritime policy and management, 28(3), 265-278. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088830110060840
  24. S. J. Yoo, H. J. Jung, W. K. Park & G. T. Yeo. (2011). An Analysis of Selection Factors for Capital Region Ports of Call Using the Fuzzy Theory. Journal Of Korea Port Economic Association, 27(2), 39-57.
  25. Y. C. Lee, J. K. Lee & G. T. Yeo. (2015). A Study on Enhancement of Incheon New Port`s Competitiveness by analysing Potential Shippers' Port Selection Criteria. Korean Journal of Logistics, 23(5), 37-51. https://doi.org/10.15735/kls.2015.23.2.003
  26. T. W. Kim, Y. S. Kim, K. S. Kwak & K. C. Nam. (2006). Analysis on the Relation Between Port Competition Players and Port Selection Factors. Journal of Korean Navigation and Port Research, 30(3), 219-226. https://doi.org/10.5394/KINPR.2006.30.3.219
  27. B. Wiegmans, A. V. Hoest & T. Notteboom. (2008). Port and Terminal Selection by Deep-sea Container Operators. Maritime Policy and Management, 35(6), 517-534. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088830802469329
  28. H. H. Jang & J. K. Lee. (2008). An Activation Device for Gwangyang Port according to the Port Determinants by Shipping Company and Shippers. Korea Logistics Review, 18(3), 87-109.
  29. Y. Z. Song, H. C. Park & M. R. Kim. (2007) A Study of the Actual Condition for Inducing Container Cargos to Gunsan Port. Journal of Korea Port Economic Association, 23(4), 71-90.
  30. G. S. Kim & K. S. Kwak. (2008) Analysis of Global Competition Factors at Busan Port. The Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 57, 25-47.
  31. K.Y.A. NG. (2006). Assessing the attractiveness of ports in the North European container transshipment market: an agenda for future research in port competitiveness, Maritime Economic Logistics, 8(3), 234-250. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100158