디지털융복합연구 (Journal of Digital Convergence)

  • 제16권10호
  • /
  • Pages.155-167
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 2713-6434(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2713-6442(eISSN)
한국디지털정책학회 (The Society of Digital Policy and Management)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

혁신클러스터 활동이 기업의 경영성과에 미치는 영향연구 - 대전지역을 중심으로 -

A Study on the Impact of Innovation Cluster Activity on Enterprise Performance - Focused on Daejeon -

  • 이윤구 (우송대학교 매니지먼트학부 경영학전공) ;
  • 현병환 (대전대학교 융합컨설팅학과)
  • Lee, Yoon-koo (School of Corporate Management Corporate Management Major, WooSong University) ;
  • Hyun, Byung-hwan (Dept of Business Consulting, DaeJeon University)
  • 투고 : 2018.07.29
  • 심사 : 2018.10.20
  • 발행 : 2018.10.28
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

이 연구는 대전지역의 중소벤처기업을 중심으로 혁신클러스터 활동(구성원간의 관심과 관계성, 정보교류와 정보습득 활동, 수요와 공급 간의 해결 활동)이 기업 경영성과에 미치는 영향을 연구하고, 관련 정책에 대한 시사점을 제시하는데 목적이 있다. 이를 위해 대전지역 소재 중소벤처기업 CEO 212명의 설문결과를 확보하고 SPSS 21을 이용하여 연구가설을 검증하였다. 실증분석결과 구성원 간의 정보교류 및 정보습득 활동과 수요와 공급자 간의 해결 활동은 경영성과에 긍정적인 관계가 확인되었으나, 구성원 간의 관심과 관계성은 경영성과에 영향이 없음이 확인되었다. 본 연구를 통해 혁신클러스터내의 기업들이 지속적인 성장과 발전을 위해서는 혁신클러스터 활동에 적극적인 참여와 정부의 다양한 지원제도나 정책 등이 확대되어야 하고, 기업들은 상호간의 만족도를 높이거나, 협력을 위한 공감대 형성을 위해 더욱 분발하고 노력을 해야 할 것이다. 부족한 관심과 관계성을 높이기 위해 혁신클러스터 기업협회들은 다양한 프로그램을 통해 구성원 간의 관계 개선을 위해 노력해야 한다는 시사점을 제시하였으며, 향후 다양한 혁신클러스터 활동의 매개변수에 대한 추가분석을 통해 경영성과 간의 체계적인 이론을 정립할 필요가 있다.

This study was designed to provide implications for related policies by researching the impact on business management performances focusing on the activities within the innovation clusters based on small and medium venture companies in Daejeon area. The questionnaires from 212 CEOs of small and medium venture businesses in Daejeon were analyzed and verified the research hypothesis using SPSS 21. From the empirical analysis, we confirmed the following results; activity of information exchange, information acquisition and solving activity between demand and supplier showed positive effects on business management performance, however the concern and relationship have no effects on business management performance. From this study, we suggest that the active participation in activity of innovation cluster and various supporting systems or policies have to expand for sustainable growth and development of companies within innovation cluster. We also propose that companies needs to try to more efforts on enhance the mutual satisfaction or forming a consensus for cooperation. This study also propose the implications that the companies, innovation cluster must try on efforts to improve relation among members for enhancing the lack of concerns and relationship.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. S. J. Lee & S. Y. Chung. (2014). Interaction between Innovation Actors in Innovation Cluster: A Case of Daedeok Innopolis. Journal of Korea technology innovation society, 17(4), 820-844.
  2. C. Bergenholtz. & C. Waldstrom. (2005). Inter-organizational network studies: A literature review. Industry and Innovation, 18(6), 539-562. https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2011.591966
  3. J. Y. Song & H. C. Kim. (2007). Knowledge Transfer and Acquisition Through Strategic Alliances : A Study of Asian Firms' Strategic Alliances in the High-tech Sector. Journal of Strategic Management, 10(1), 1-18.
  4. K. H. Kang, S. C. Choi & J. A. Kang. (2015). How Does Knowledge Depth/Breadth Moderate Between Alliance Intensity and Innovative Performance? Journal of Strategic Management, 18(1), 31-55. https://doi.org/10.17786/jsm.2015.18.1.002
  5. B. J. Park, S. H. Bae & S. I. Baek. (2013). Exploring the Effects of Alliance Networks on Firm's Innovation Performance. Entrue Journal of Information Technology, 12(1), 117-131.
  6. D. S. Yim, W. D. Kim & J. H. Yu. (2004). The Evolutionary Process of Daedeok Science Town and International Comparison - In the Perspective of Innovation Cluster. Journal of Korea technology innovation society, 7(2), 373-395.
  7. J. I. Choi. (2008). Practice-based MOT Education : using TEC program in Daejeon Techno Park. Journal of Industrial Economics and Business, 21(4), 1455-1478.
  8. S. S. Song. (2009). Evolution of Science and Technology Poles : The Case of Daedeok Science Town. Journal of Science & Technology Studies, 9(1), 33-55.
  9. W. D. Kim & K. G. Kim. (2007). Development and Application of Evaluation Indicators of Innovation Cluster Networks: Focused on Daedeok IT Cluster. Seoul : Science and Technology Policy Institute.
  10. M. K. Min, I. K. Lee & J. C. Park. (2008). Characterizing Social Networks among High-Tech Venture Firms for Efficiently Securing their Management Resources-A case study of High-Tech Venture Firms in Daedeok Innopolis Zone. Korea Journal of Business Administration, 6(71), 2532-2547.
  11. D. W. Ryu. (2007). Innovation Cluster and Regional Development In Daejeon Regional. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 2(3), 103-122.
  12. D. W. Jo. (2007). A Study on the Ecological Environment Analysis of the Daededk Innopolis of Research and Development. Journal of management & economics, 30(1), 61-79.
  13. B. H. Choi. (2009). The study of the influences of social capital and structural factors on innovative performance in industrial clusters. Ph. D. Dissertation. Seoul National University of Science and Technology, Seoul.
  14. J. S. Seo. (2012). A study of relationship between knowledge management capabilities of hi-tech companies and innovation performance-With focus on Daedeok Innopolis. Ph. D. Dissertation. Chungnam National University, Daejeon.
  15. E. H. Sung. (2014). Does Volunteerism Affect Innovative Performance & Competitiveness of Companies in innovative Clusters? Journal of International Trade & Commerce, 10(4), 691-707. https://doi.org/10.16980/jitc.10.4.201408.691
  16. J. K. Kim. (2015). Study on Ef ects of Human and Social Capitals of CEOs in Relation to External Funds Application and Initial Marketing Accomplishments : Focused on high-tech venture enterprises in Daeduck innopolis. Ph. D. Dissertation. Daejeon University, Daejeon.
  17. Y. C. Jung & S. J. Lee. (2016). A Study on Growth and Development Impact Factors for Innovation Cluster: A Case of the Daedeok Innopolis. Journal of Technology Innovation, 24(1), 190-219.
  18. H. R. Hwang & J. Y. Choung. (2014). Innovation System Transition - The case of Daedeok Innopolis. Economy and society, 104, 300-334.
  19. E. H. Sung & K. Y. Whang. (2008). Problems and Improvement Plans of the Daedeok Innopolis in Korea: Focus on the role of innovation support organization Journal of management & economics, 31(1), 63-80.
  20. K. S. An & J. Y. Hwang. (2017). The Effects of Social Capital on Occupational Aspiration in University Students. Journal of Korea Convergence Society, 8(9), 237-247. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2017.8.9.237
  21. J. Nahapiet & S. Ghosh. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242-266. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1998.533225
  22. K. Kim. (2012). The Impact of Organizational Social Capital on Knowledge Management Activities and Organizational Performance: Based on Officials' Perceptions in Local Government. The Korea Public Administration Journal, 21(1), 125-161.
  23. K. J. Kim & B. K. Ching. (2008). Focused on the Moderating Effect of Psychological Capital: A Study on the Impact of Intellectual Capital on the Innovative Behavior. Productivity review, 22(1), 25-47. https://doi.org/10.15843/kpapr.22.1.200802.25
  24. J. S. Coleman. (2014). Social capital in the creation of human capital. International Library of Critical Writings in Economics, 292, 380-405.
  25. D. De Clercq & D. Rangarajan (2008). The Role of Perceived Relational Support in Entrepreneur -Customer Dyads. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 32(4), 659-683. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2008.00247.x
  26. M. Westerlund & S. Svahn. (2008). A Relationship Value Perspective of Social Capital in Networks of Software SMEs. Industrial Marketing Management, 37(5), 492-501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2008.04.003
  27. D. M. De Carolis & P. Saparito. (2006). Social Capital, Cognition, and Entrepreneurial Opportunities: A Theoretical Framework. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 30(1), 41-56. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00109.x
  28. I. Castro & J. L. Roldan. (2013). A mediation model between dimensions of social capital. International Business Review, 22(6), 1034-1050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2013.02.004
  29. K. W. Lee. (2009). The Ef ect of Strength of Ties and Diversity of Ties in the Venture Business Networks on the Venture Business Performance. Ph. D. Dissertation. Seoul Venture University, Seoul.
  30. E. K. Park & T. G. Kang. (2014). Effects of Entrepreneurial Orientation and Network Capabilities on International Performance of Korean small and medium-sized Enterprises. International Business Journal, 25(3), 97-131. https://doi.org/10.14365/ibj.2014.25.3.4
  31. S. S. Ryou. (2011). The Effects of Network Types and Relational Factors on the Learning and Performance in Corporate. Ph. D. Dissertation. Chosun University, Gwangju.
  32. H. D. Seol. (2014). Transformational Leadership, Social Capital, and Knowledge Sharing. The Korean-Japanese Journal of Economics & Management Studies, 62, 45-69.
  33. J. P. Choi. (2012). (A) Study on On-Of line Social Network Af ecting Job Performance and Career Success. Ph. D. Dissertation. Kookmin University, Seoul.
  34. S. Appelt, B. Van Beuzekom, F. Galindo-Rueda & R. de Pinho. (2017). Which factors influence the international mobility of research scientists? OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 1-31.
  35. K. J. Lee & M. S. Chung. (2017). The Effects of Human, Social and Cultural Capitals on Economic Independence and Life Satisfaction in Disabled Persons. Journal of Korea Convergence Society, 8(6), 337-348. https://doi.org/10.15207/JKCS.2017.8.6.337
  36. L. Andrea. (2012). How Can External Relationships Enhance Innovation in SMEs? New Evidence for Europe. Journal of Small Business Management, 50(2), 310-339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2012.00355.x
  37. W. Tsai. & S. Ghoshal. (1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41(4), 464-476.
  38. G. J. Kim & S. G. Yi. (2018). A Study on the Effect of the Information System Factors and the Organizational Factors of Venture Firms on Procedural Management Performance. Journal of Convergence for Information Technology, 8(2), 209-218. https://doi.org/10.22156/CS4SMB.2018.8.2.209
  39. S. S. Bang & B. M. Kim. (2014). The Effect of External Collaborations and Information Sharing on Corporate Performance. Academy of Management Journal, 88, 137-157.
  40. K. M. ndrews. & B. I. Delahaye. (2000). Influences on knowledge process in organizational learning: The psychosocial filter. Journal of Management Studies, 37(6), 792-810.
  41. P. S. Adle. & S. W. Kwon. (2002). Social Capital: prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27, 17-40. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2002.5922314
  42. B. McEvily, V. Perrone & A. Zaheer. (2003). Trust as an Organizing Principle. Organization Science, 14(1), 91-103. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.1.91.12814
  43. M. G. Huh. (2011). Social Capital, Knowledge Creation, and Innovation. Korean journal of Management, 19(1), 41-78.
  44. G. Todorova & B. Durisin. (2007). Absorptive Capacity: Valuing a Reconceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 774-786. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.25275513
  45. N. Tzokas, Y. A. Kim & H. Akbar. (2015). Absorptive capacity and performance: The role of customer relationship and technological capabilities in high-tech SMEs. Industrial Marketing Management, 47, 134-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2015.02.033
  46. Y. Yu, T. X. Hao, X. Y. Dong & M. Khalifa. (2013). A multilevel model for effects of social capital and knowledge sharing in knowledge-intensive work teams. International Journal of Information Management, 33(5), 780-790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.05.005
  47. A. S. Cui., R. J. Calantone & D. A. Griffith. (2011). Strategic change and termination of interfirm partnerships. Strategic management journal, 32(4), 402-423. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.881
  48. C. T. Street & A. F. Cameron. (2007). External Relationships and the Small Business: A Review of Small Business Alliance and Network Research. Journal of Small Business Management, 45(2), 239-266. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2007.00211.x
  49. M. S. Kim & K. S. Hong. (2013). The Impact of Organization Justice on Social Capital and Knowledge Sharing. Korea Journal of Business Administration, 26(5), 1123-1148.
  50. J. W. Kim. (2012). The Effects of External Collaborations on the Innovation Performance of Korean Venture Businesses. Journal of Korea technology innovation society, 15(3), 533-556.
  51. T. H. Nam. (2013). The Ef ect of the Network Characteristics and Firm Performance on the Regional Innovative Cluster Performance. Ph. D. Dissertation. Kyungil University, Kyungsan
  52. B. Fynes, C. Voss & S. de Burca. (2005). The impact of supply chain relationship quality on quality performance. International journal of production economics, 96(3), 339-354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2004.05.008
  53. Y. S. Cho & K. I. Khoe. (2018). The moderating effedts of organizational culture on the relationship among open information innovation, strategic alliance and export performance of SMEs. Journal of Convergence for Information Technology, 8(2), 219-225. https://doi.org/10.22156/CS4SMB.2018.8.2.219
  54. N. ORegan, A. Ghobadian & M. Sims. (2006). Fast tracking innovation in manufacturing SMEs. Technovation, 26(2), 251-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2005.01.003
  55. T. S. Manolova, N. M. Carter, I. M. Manev & B. S. Gyoshev(2007). The Differential Effect of Men and Women Entrepreneurs' Human Capital and Networking on Growth Expectancies in Bulgaria. Entrepreneurship: Theory & Practice, 31(3), 407-426. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00180.x