DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Novel condylar repositioning method for 3D-printed models

  • Sugahara, Keisuke (Department of Oral Pathobiological Science and Surgery, Tokyo Dental College) ;
  • Katsumi, Yoshiharu (Department of Oral Pathobiological Science and Surgery, Tokyo Dental College) ;
  • Koyachi, Masahide (Department of Oral Pathobiological Science and Surgery, Tokyo Dental College) ;
  • Koyama, Yu (Department of Oral Pathobiological Science and Surgery, Tokyo Dental College) ;
  • Matsunaga, Satoru (Oral Health Science Center, Tokyo Dental College) ;
  • Odaka, Kento (Department of Anatomy, Tokyo Dental College) ;
  • Abe, Shinichi (Department of Anatomy, Tokyo Dental College) ;
  • Takano, Masayuki (Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Tokyo Dental College) ;
  • Katakura, Akira (Department of Oral Pathobiological Science and Surgery, Tokyo Dental College)
  • Received : 2018.01.09
  • Accepted : 2018.02.14
  • Published : 2018.12.31

Abstract

Background: Along with the advances in technology of three-dimensional (3D) printer, it became a possible to make more precise patient-specific 3D model in the various fields including oral and maxillofacial surgery. When creating 3D models of the mandible and maxilla, it is easier to make a single unit with a fused temporomandibular joint, though this results in poor operability of the model. However, while models created with a separate mandible and maxilla have operability, it can be difficult to fully restore the position of the condylar after simulation. The purpose of this study is to introduce and asses the novel condylar repositioning method in 3D model preoperational simulation. Methods: Our novel condylar repositioning method is simple to apply two irregularities in 3D models. Three oral surgeons measured and evaluated one linear distance and two angles in 3D models. Results: This study included two patients who underwent sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) and two benign tumor patients who underwent segmental mandibulectomy and immediate reconstruction. For each SSRO case, the mandibular condyles were designed to be convex and the glenoid cavities were designed to be concave. For the benign tumor cases, the margins on the resection side, including the joint portions, were designed to be convex, and the resection margin was designed to be concave. The distance from the mandibular ramus to the tip of the maxillary canine, the angle created by joining the inferior edge of the orbit to the tip of the maxillary canine and the ramus, the angle created by the lines from the base of the mentum to the endpoint of the condyle, and the angle between the most lateral point of the condyle and the most medial point of the condyle were measured before and after simulations. Near-complete matches were observed for all items measured before and after model simulations of surgery in all jaw deformity and reconstruction cases. Conclusions: We demonstrated that 3D models manufactured using our method can be applied to simulations and fully restore the position of the condyle without the need for special devices.

Keywords

References

  1. Katsumi Y, Sugahara K, Matsunaga S, Odaka K, Mitomo K, Abe S et al (2016) Planning for orthognathic surgery at medical fabrication laboratory in Tokyo Dental College (Fab Lab TDC): clinical application of full-scale-model made by 3-dimensional ink jet printer for orthognathic surgery. Oral Science Japan 2016:9-11
  2. Ayoub AF, Rehab M, O'neil M, Khambay B, Ju X, Barbenel J et al (2014) A novel approach for planning orthognathic surgery: the integration of dental casts into three-dimensional printed mandibular models. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43:454-459 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2013.08.016
  3. Yuan P, Mai H, Li J, Ho DC, Lai Y, Liu S et al (2017) Design, development and clinical validation of computer-aided surgical simulation system for streamlined orthognathic surgical planning. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 12:2129-2143 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-017-1585-6
  4. Mayuka N, Katsuhiko S, Kazutaka K (2016) The characteristics of mandibular morphology in facial asymmetry by using axial cephalometric radiographs. Nihon Univ J Oral Sci U 42:4-54
  5. Suojanen J, Leikola J, Stoor P (2016) The use of patient-specific implants in orthognathic surgery: a series of 32 maxillary osteotomy patients. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 44:1913-1916 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2016.09.008
  6. Cornelius CP, Smolka W, Giessler GA, Wilde F, Probst FA (2015) Patientspecific reconstruction plates are the missing link in computer-assisted mandibular reconstruction: a showcase for technical description. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 43:624-629 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2015.02.016
  7. Wilde F, Hanken H, Probst F, Schramm A, Heiland M, Cornelius CP (2015) Multicenter study on the use of patient-specific CAD/CAM reconstruction plates for mandibular reconstruction. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 10:2035-2051 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-015-1193-2
  8. Yuki M, Koichi N, Machiko K, Hiroshi Y, Kazuto K, Kiyoshi H (2014) The comparative study of two types of condylar positioning systems for double-jaw orthognathic surgery. J Jaw Deform 24:203-210 https://doi.org/10.5927/jjjd.24.203

Cited by

  1. A safe, stable, and convenient three-dimensional device for high Le Fort I osteotomy vol.42, pp.None, 2018, https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-020-00276-1