Biomedical Engineering Letters

The Korean Society of Medical and Biological Engineering (대한의용생체공학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Analytic simulator and image generator of multiple-scattering Compton camera for prompt gamma ray imaging

  • Kim, Soo Mee (Maritime ICT R&D Center, Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology)
  • Received : 2018.08.20
  • Accepted : 2018.08.30
  • Published : 2018.11.30
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

For prompt gamma ray imaging for biomedical applications and environmental radiation monitoring, we propose herein a multiple-scattering Compton camera (MSCC). MSCC consists of three or more semiconductor layers with good energy resolution, and has potential for simultaneous detection and differentiation of multiple radio-isotopes based on the measured energies, as well as three-dimensional (3D) imaging of the radio-isotope distribution. In this study, we developed an analytic simulator and a 3D image generator for a MSCC, including the physical models of the radiation source emission and detection processes that can be utilized for geometry and performance prediction prior to the construction of a real system. The analytic simulator for a MSCC records coincidence detections of successive interactions in multiple detector layers. In the successive interaction processes, the emission direction of the incident gamma ray, the scattering angle, and the changed traveling path after the Compton scattering interaction in each detector, were determined by a conical surface uniform random number generator (RNG), and by a Klein-Nishina RNG. The 3D image generator has two functions: the recovery of the initial source energy spectrum and the 3D spatial distribution of the source. We evaluated the analytic simulator and image generator with two different energetic point radiation sources (Cs-137 and Co-60) and with an MSCC comprising three detector layers. The recovered initial energies of the incident radiations were well differentiated from the generated MSCC events. Correspondingly, we could obtain a multi-tracer image that combined the two differentiated images. The developed analytic simulator in this study emulated the randomness of the detection process of a multiple-scattering Compton camera, including the inherent degradation factors of the detectors, such as the limited spatial and energy resolutions. The Doppler-broadening effect owing to the momentum distribution of electrons in Compton scattering was not considered in the detection process because most interested isotopes for biomedical and environmental applications have high energies that are less sensitive to Doppler broadening. The analytic simulator and image generator for MSCC can be utilized to determine the optimal geometrical parameters, such as the distances between detectors and detector size, thus affecting the imaging performance of the Compton camera prior to the development of a real system.

Keywords

Acknowledgement

Supported by : Korea Institute of Ocean Science and Technology

References

  1. Kamea T, Enomoto R, Hanada N. A new method to measure energy, direction, and polarization of gamma-rays. Nucl Instr Meth Phys Res A. 1987;260:254-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9002(87)90410-4
  2. Kamea T, Hanada H. Prototype design of multiple Compton gamma-ray camera. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1988;35:352-5. https://doi.org/10.1109/23.12741
  3. Dogan N, Wehe DK, Knoll GF. Multiple Compton scattering gamma ray imaging camera. Nucl Instr Meth Phys Res A. 1990;299:501-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9002(90)90832-Q
  4. Motomura S, Kanayama Y, Haba H, Watanabe Y, Enomoto S. Multiple molecular simultaneous imaging in a live mouse using semiconductor Compton camera. J Anal At Spectrom. 2008;23:1089-92. https://doi.org/10.1039/b802964d
  5. Richard M-H, Chevallier M, Dauvergne D, Freud N, Henriquet P, Le Foulher F, et al. Design guidelines for a double scattering Compton camera for prompt-c imaging during ion beam therapy: a Monte Carlo simulation study. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 2011;58(1):87-94. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNS.2010.2076303
  6. IERNet. http://iernet.kins.re.kr/.
  7. Hossain A, Cho M, Lee S. Compression induced contrast change in X-ray mammograms: a simulation study. Biomed Eng Lett. 2011;1(1):49-55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13534-011-0007-x
  8. Ning Y, Zhang Y. A new approach for multi-channel surface EMG signal simulation. Biomed Eng Lett. 2017;7(1):45-53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13534-017-0009-4
  9. Sadremomtaz A. Capabilities of the Monte Carlo simulation codes for modeling of a small animal SPECT camera. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;52(4):303-10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13139-018-0530-0
  10. Ordonez C, Chang W, Bolozdynya A. Angular uncertainties due to geometry and spatial resolution in Compton cameras. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1999;46(4):1142-7. https://doi.org/10.1109/23.790848
  11. Kim SM, Lee JS, Lee MN, Lee JH, Lee CS, Kim C-H, et al. Two approaches to implementing projector-backprojector pairs for 3D reconstruction from Compton scattered data. Nucl Instr Meth Phys Res A. 2007;571:255-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2006.10.076
  12. Jiang J, Shimazoe K, Nakamura Y, Takahashi H, Shikaze Y, Nishizawa Y, et al. A prototype of aerial radiation monitoring system using an unmanned helicopter mounting a GAGG scintillator Compton camera. J Nucl Sci Technol. 2016;53(7):1067-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223131.2015.1089796
  13. Sato Y, Kawabata K, Ozawa S, Izumi R, Kaburagi M, Tanifuji Y, et al. Radiation imaging system using a Compton gamma-ray imager mounted on a remotely operated machine. IFAC PapersOnLine. 2017;50:1062-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2017.08.218
  14. Kim S, Lee J, Lee C, Kim C, Lee M, Lee D, Lee S-J. Fully three-dimensional OSEM-based image reconstruction for Compton imaging using optimized ordering schemes. Phys Med Biol. 2010;55:5007-27. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/55/17/009
  15. Chun S. The use of anatomical information for molecular image reconstruction algorithms: attenuation/scatter correction, motion compensation, and noise reduction. Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;50(1):13-23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13139-016-0399-8
  16. Kim S, Seo H, Park J, Kim C, Lee C, Lee S-J, Lee D, Lee J. Resolution recovery reconstruction for a Compton camera. Phys Med Biol. 2013;58:2823-40. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/58/9/2823
  17. Mackin D, Polf J, Peterson S, Beddar S. The effects of doppler broadening and detector resolution on the performance of three-stage Compton cameras. Med Phys. 2013;40(1):012402.