DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Constructing a Model for National Authority Control Utilizing VIVO

VIVO를 활용한 국가적 전거구축모델에 관한 연구

  • 오삼균 (성균관대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 한상은 (성균관대학교 문헌정보학과) ;
  • 손태익 (성균관대학교 삼성학술정보관 자연학술정보팀) ;
  • 김성훈 (성균관대학교 문헌정보학과)
  • Received : 2018.08.19
  • Accepted : 2018.09.12
  • Published : 2018.09.30

Abstract

Despite repeated efforts to develop a methodological foundation for assembling collaborative authority data in South Korea, issues such as the establishment of a standard authority model and standard authority construction as well as the reconfiguration of existing entities in authority building have prevented such research from generating a cooperative push for nation-wide authority data and progressing toward concrete implementation. The formulation of a collaborative and well-utilized collection of national authority data accordingly calls for 1) a practical approach to supporting both established authority data contributors and newly organized avenues of mutual participation in authority building, 2) committed involvement on the part of national institutions capable of providing the project with sustained assistance, and 3) a standard identification system which allows multiple organizations to merge their data. This study addresses the challenges of the current environment by taking stock of the key components necessary for the creation of collaborative authority data and using a Semantic Web-based interoperable VIVO ontology model to propose a viable national authority data framework.

전거데이터 공동구축을 목표로 하는 많은 국내 연구가 시행되었음에도 불구하고 국가전거구축의 협업 환경은 표준 전거의 제정, 표준 전거 구축원칙의 제정, 기존 전거구축 기관의 업무 개편, 공동구축 업무의 핵심기관 선정 등과 같은 전제 조건의 미비로 인해 그 실질적 조성이 막혀 있다. 국가전거를 공동으로 구축하고 원활하게 활용하기 위해서는 기존 전거구축기관의 업무에 지장을 초래하지 않는 현실적 협업 방안과 지속적 추진력을 보유한 국가기관의 참여와 아울러 다수 기관의 데이터 병합을 가능케 하는 표준식별체계가 요구된다. 본 연구의 목적은 국가전거의 공동 구축을 위한 여건 조성에 있어서 필수사항이 무엇인가를 문헌조사로 밝히고, 시맨틱웹 기반으로 구축되어 상호운용성이 우수한 VIVO 온톨로지 모델의 활용을 통해 구현 가능한 국가전거 구축모델을 제시하는 것이다.

Keywords

References

  1. Kim, Mee-Hyang (2009). A study on cooperative authority control in university libraries. Official Gazette of National College & University Libraries, (27), 41-70.
  2. Kim, Tea-Hyun, Kang, Ho-Gap, Yoon, Hee-Don, Oh, Sam-gyun, de Fremery, W., & Kim, Seonghun (2016). Establishment of information strategy planning for upgrading Korean library information system network(KOLIS-NET): Final Report. Seoul: National Library of Korea.
  3. Park, Seon-Hee (2007). University library authority file construction status: centered on Seoul National University library. Official Gazette of Seoul National University Library, (129), 43-56.
  4. Oh, Dong-geun (2000). A study on the development for the Korean authority database system. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 31(4), 21-47.
  5. Lee, Mihwa (2012). A study on direction of authority control by surveying the authority control in university libraries. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 43(3), 5-26. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.43.3.201209.5
  6. Lee, Mihwa (2014). A study on the applicability of ISNI for authority control. Journal of the Korean Society for Information Management, 31(3), 133-151. http://dx.doi.org/10.3743/KOSIM.2014.31.3.133
  7. Lee, Mihwa, & Rho, Jee-Hyun (2016). A study on the directions of authorized access points in KCR4. Journal of Korean Library and Information Science Society, 47(1), 47-69. https://doi.org/10.16981/kliss.47.1.201603.47
  8. Lee, Jea-Sun, Kim, Eun-Su, Kim, Hyeon-Ja, Jo, Su-Hee, & Shim, Kyung (2009). Name authority and online catalog (OPAC) research for next generation libraries. Seoul: National Library of Korea.
  9. Byrum Jr, J. D. (2004). NACO: A cooperative model for building and maintaining a shared name authority database. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 38(3-4), 237-249. https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v38n03_18
  10. Casalini, M., Chew, C., Cluff, C., Durocher, M., Folsom, S., Frank, P., Gatenby, J., Godby, J., Kovari, J., Lorimer, N., Lynch, C., Murray, P., Myntti, J., Neatrour, A., Nimer, C., Pilsk, S., Pitti, D., Quintana, I., Wang, J., & Warner, S. (2018). National strategy for shareable local name authorities national rorum: White Paper. Ecommons.cornell.edu. Retrieved from https://ecommons.cornell.edu/handle/1813/56343
  11. Crowe, K., & Clair, K. (2015). Developing a tool for publishing linked local authority data. Journal of Library Metadata, 15(3/4), 227-240. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2015.1099993
  12. Ding, Y., Mitchell, S., Rikert, J. C., Lowe, B., He, B., & the VIVO Ontology team. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4047/750dd7b708b0036ff27b0b31c78faf4ec873.pdf
  13. Myntti, J., & Cothran, N. (2013). Authority control in a digital repository: Preparing for linked data. Journal of Library Metadata, 13(2/3), 95-113. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386389.2013.826061
  14. Sandberg, J., & Jin, Q. (2016). How should catalogers provide authority control for journal article authors? Name identifiers in the linked data world. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 54(8), 537-552. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639374.2016.1238429
  15. Wang, J. (2018). Shareable local name authority reference model (Draft). Retrieved from https://ecommons.cornell.edu/handle/1813/56582
  16. Wolverton, R. E. (2005). Authority control in academic libraries in the United States: a survey. Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, 41(1), 111-131. https://doi.org/10.1300/J104v41n01_06
  17. CU Experts. Retrieved from https://experts.colorado.edu/
  18. SCHOLARS@CORNELL. Retrieved from https://scholars.cornell.edu/
  19. Scholars@Duke. Retrieved from https://scholars.duke.edu/
  20. VIAF. Retrieved from https://www.oclc.org/en/viaf.html
  21. VIVO. Retrieved from https://vivoweb.org/info/about-vivo