전기전자학회논문지 (Journal of IKEEE)

  • 제22권3호
  • /
  • Pages.590-598
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1226-7244(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2288-243X(eISSN)
한국전기전자학회 (Institute of Korean Electrical and Electronics Engineers)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

RPL에서 DIS 메시지를 이용한 Storing 노드 추가 및 Instance 평준화 기법 연구

A Study on Storing Node Addition and Instance Leveling Using DIS Message in RPL

  • Bae, Sung-Hyun (Dept. of Aviations Information & Communication KyungWoon University) ;
  • Yun, Jeong-Oh (Dept. of Aviations Information & Communication KyungWoon University)
  • 투고 : 2018.08.23
  • 심사 : 2018.09.05
  • 발행 : 2018.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

최근 사물들에 인터넷 서비스를 제공하는 IoT(Internet of Things) 기술에 관한 관심이 높아지고 있다. IoT는 홈 네트워크, 헬스 케어, 재난 알림 등에서 다양한 서비스를 제공하고 있다. LLN(Low Power & Lossy Networks) 특징을 갖는 IoT는 빈번한 센서 노드의 손실이 발생한다. IoT의 표준 라우팅 프로토콜인 RPL은 센서 노드의 손실이 발생하면 전체 경로 재설정(Global repair)을 수행하여 데이터를 전송한다. 하지만 낮은 사양의 센서 노드로 인한 빈번한 센서 노드 손실은 잦은 전체 경로 재설정으로 인해 네트워크 성능 저하를 일으킨다. 본 논문에선 Storing mode 센서 노드 선정 이후에도 잦은 경로 재설정 문제로 인한 네트워크 성능 저하 문제를 해결하기 위한 Storing mode 센서 노드의 추가 선정 방법을 제안하고 각 Instance의 전체 경로 재설정 횟수의 평준화 방법을 제안하고자 한다.

Recently, interest in IoT(Internet of Things) technology, which provides Internet services to objects, is increasing. IoT offers a variety of services in home networks, healthcare, and disaster alerts. IoT with LLN(Low Power & Lossy Networks) feature frequently loses sensor node. RPL, the standard routing protocol of IoT, performs global repair when data loss occurs in a sensor node. However, frequent loss of sensor nodes due to lower sensor nodes causes network performance degradation due to frequent full path reset. In this paper, we propose an additional selection method of the storage mode sensor node to solve the network degradation problem due to the frequent path resetting problem even after selecting the storage mode sensor node, and propose a method of equalizing the total path resetting number of each instance.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Z. Sheng, S. Yang, Y. Yu, A. V. Vasilakos, J. A. Mccann and K. K. Leung, "A survey on the ietf protocol suite for the internet of things: standards, challenges, and opportunities," IEEE Wireless Communications, vol.20, no.6, pp. 91-98, December 2013. DOI:10.1109/MWC.2013.6704479
  2. P. Thulasiraman, "RPL routing for multigateway AMI networks under interference constraints," IEEE International Conference on Communications, Budapest, 2013. DOI:10.1109/ICC.2013.6655272
  3. E. Ancillotti, R. Bruno and M. Conti, "The role of the RPL routing protocol for smart grid communications," IEEE Communications Magazine, vol.51, no.1, pp. 75-83, January 2013. DOI:10.1109/MCOM.2013.6400442
  4. http://www.postscapes.com/internet-of-thingshardware/#iot-boardcomparison/view-hardwaredetails3/
  5. D. Gadde and M. S. Chaudhari, "Survey on routing protocol for low-power and lossy networks," IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Research, Madurai, 2015. DOI:10.1109/ICCIC.2015.7435775
  6. T. Winter and ROLL Design Team, "RPL: Routing protocol for low power and lossy networks," Netw. Working Group Internet Drafts, July 2009.
  7. E. Aljarrah, M. B. Yassein and S. Aljawarneh, "Routing protocol of low-power and lossy network: Survey and open issues," International Conference on Engineering & MIS, Agadir, 2016. DOI:10.1109/ICEMIS.2016.7745304
  8. M. C. R. Anand and M. P. Tahiliani, "mRPL++: Smarter-HOP for optimizing mobility in RPL," IEEE Region 10 Symposium, Bali, 2016. DOI:10.1109/TENCONSpring.2016.7519374
  9. Mayzaud, A., Sehgal, A., Badonnel, R., Chrisment, I. and Schonwalder, J, "Using the RPL Protocol for Supporting Passive Monitoring in the Internet of Things," IEEE/IFIP Network Operations and Management Symposium, April, 2016. DOI:10.1109/NOMS.2016.7502833
  10. S. Elyengui, R. Bouhouchi and T. Ezzedine, "A comparative performance study of the routing protocols RPL, LOADng and LOADng-CTP with bidirectional traffic for AMI scenario," International Conference on Smart Grid and Clean Energy Technologies, Offenburg, 2015. DOI:10.1109/ICSGCE.2015.7454267
  11. Wei Gan, Zhiqiang Shi, Chen Zhang, Limin Sun and D. Ionescu, "MERPL: A more memory-efficient storing mode in RPL," IEEE International Conference on Networks, Singapore, 2013. DOI:10.1109/ICON.2013.6781985
  12. Ko, J., Jeong, J., Park, J., Jun, J. A., Gnawali, O. and Paek, J, "DualMOPRPL: Supporting Multiple Modes of Downward Routing in a Single RPL Network," ACM Transactions on Sensor Network, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 1-20, February 2015. DOI: 10.1145/2700261
  13. S. Yessad, N. Tazarart, L. Bakli, L. Medjkoune-Bouallouche and D. Aissani, "Balanced energy efficient routing protocol for WSN," International Conference on Communications and Information Technology, Hammamet, 2012. DOI:10.1109/ICCITechnol.2012.6285817
  14. S. S. Wang, H. T. Liu and Y. D. Chen, "Link quality aware routing protocol for low-power and lossy networks," IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference, Istanbul, 2014. DOI:10.1109/WCNC.2014.6952816
  15. J. Guo, P. Orlik, K. Parsons, K. Ishibashi and D. Takita, "Resource Aware Routing Protocol in Heterogeneous Wireless Machine-to-Machine Networks," IEEE Global Communications Conference, San Diego, CA, 2015. DOI:10.1109/GLOCOM.2015.7417203
  16. NS3, "http://www.nsnam.org/," 2016.