식물분류학회지 (Korean Journal of Plant Taxonomy)

  • 제48권3호
  • /
  • Pages.185-194
  • /
  • 2018
  • /
  • 1225-8318(pISSN)
  • /
  • 2466-1546(eISSN)
한국식물분류학회 (The Korean Society of Plant Taxonomists)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

The taxonomic consideration of floral morphology in the Persicaria sect. Cephalophilon (Polygonaceae)

  • KONG, Min-Jung (Laboratory of Plant Systematics, Department of Biology, Kyung Hee University) ;
  • HONG, Suk-Pyo (Laboratory of Plant Systematics, Department of Biology, Kyung Hee University)
  • 투고 : 2018.06.29
  • 심사 : 2018.07.12
  • 발행 : 2018.09.30
PDF 다운로드
⟨ 이전 논문 다음 논문 ⟩

초록

A comparative floral morphological study of 19 taxa in Persicaria sect. Cephalophilon with four taxa related to Koenigia was conducted to evaluate the taxonomic implications. The flowers of P. sect. Cephalophilon have (four-)five-lobed tepals; five, six, or eight stamens, and one pistil with two or three styles. The size range of each floral characteristic varies according to the taxa; generally P. humilis, P. glacialis var. glacialis and Koenigia taxa have rather small floral sizes. The connate degrees of the tepal lobes and styles also vary. The tepal epidermis consists of elongated rectangular cells with variation of the anticlinal cell walls (ACWs). Two types of glandular trichomes are found. The peltate glandular trichome (PT) was observed in nearly all of the studied taxa. The PT was consistently distributed on the outer tepal of P. sect. Cephalophilon, while Koenigia taxa and P. glacialis var. glacialis had this type of trichome on both sides of the tepal. P. criopolitana had only long-stalked pilate-glandular trichomes (LT) on the outer tepal. The nectary is distributed on the basal part of the inner tepal, with three possible shapes: dome-like, elongated, and disc-like nectary. The nectaries are always accompanied by elongated or spheroidal papillae. Various combinations of floral characters (e.g., the numbers of stamens and styles, the stigma shape, the nectary shape, ACWs, cuticular striation and the trichome type and distribution) of P. sect. Cephalophilon are useful when attempting to recognize the infrasectional levels of P. sect. Cephalophilon recently proposed. Here, we describe the floral characteristics in detail and discuss the taxonomic significance of the floral characters.

키워드

참고문헌

  1. Barthlott, W. 1990. Scanning electron microscopy of the epidermal surface in plants. In Scanning Electron Microscopy in Taxonomy and Function Morphology. Claugher, D. (ed.), Clarendon Press, Oxford. Pp. 69-94.
  2. Choi, H. J., A. R. Davis and J. H. Cota-SAnchez. 2011. Comparative floral structure of four New World Allium (Amaryllidaceae) species. Systematic Botany 36: 870-882. https://doi.org/10.1600/036364411X604895
  3. Christensen, K. I. and H. V. Hansen. 1998. SEM studies of epidermal patterns of petals in the angiosperms. Opera Botanica 135: 5-91.
  4. Cildir, H., A. Kahraman and M. Dogan. 2012. Petal and sepal epidermal micromorphology of six Lathyrus taxa (Fabaceae) and their systematic value. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca 40: 35-41. https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha4017503
  5. Costa, V. B. S., R. M. M. Pimentel, M. G. S. Chagas, G. D. Alves and C. C. Castro. 2017. Petal micromorphology and its relationship to pollination. Plant Biology 19: 115-122. https://doi.org/10.1111/plb.12523
  6. Freeman, C. C. and J. L. Reveal. 2005. Polygonaceae. In Flora of North America. Vol. 5. Flora of North America Editorial Committee (ed.), Oxford University Press, New York. Pp. 479-601.
  7. Gale, R. M. O. and S. J. Owens. 1983. Cell distribution and surface morphology in petals, androecia and styles of Commelinaceae. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 87: 247-262. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1983.tb00993.x
  8. Haraldson, K. 1978. Anatomy and taxonomy in Polygonaceae subfam. Polygonoideae Meissn. emend. Jaretzky. Symbolae Botanisk Upsalienses 22: 1-95.
  9. Hedberg, O. 1997. The genus Koenigia L. emend. Hedberg (Polygonaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 124: 295-330.
  10. Hong, S.-P. 2001. Tepal surface micromorphology in the genus Fagopyrum Mill. (Polygonaceae) and its systematic implication. Proceedings of the 8th international symposium of buckwheat. Pp. 264-270
  11. Hong, S.-P., L.-P. Ronse Decraene and E. Smets. 1998. Systematic significance of tepal surface morphology in tribes Persicarieae and Polygoneae (Polygonaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 127: 91-116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1998.tb02091.x
  12. Ihlenfeldt, H. D. 1960. Entwicklungsgeschichtliche, morphologische und systematische Untersuchungen an Mesembryanthemum. Feddes Repertorium 63: 1-104.
  13. Kay, Q. O. N., H. S. Daoud and C. H. Stirton. 1981. Pigment distribution, light reflection and cell structure in petals. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 83: 57-83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1981.tb00129.x
  14. Kim, M.-H., M. Kwak, J. Song, S. J. Lee, M.-J. Yoo and C.-W. Park. 2001. Morphology of hairs, flowers, and achenes of Polygonum section Echinocaulon Meisn. (Polygonaceae). Korean Journal of Plant Taxonomy 31: 143-160. https://doi.org/10.11110/kjpt.2001.31.2.143
  15. Lamb Frye, A. S. and K. A. Kron. 2003. rbcL phylogeny and character evolution in Polygonaceae. Systematic Botany 28: 326-332.
  16. Li, A.-J., B. Bao, A. E. Grabovskava-Borodina, S.-P. Hong, J. McNeill, S. L. Mosyakin, H. Ohba and C.-W. Park. 2003. Polygonaceae. In Flora of China. Vol. 5. Wu, Z. Y., P. H. Raven and D. Y. Hong (eds.), Science Press, Beijing and Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis, MO. Pp. 277-350.
  17. Meisner, C. F. 1832. Synopsis Polygonearum. In Plantae Asiaticae Rariores. Vol. 3. Wallich, N. (ed.), Treuttel and Wurtz, London. Pp. 53-65.
  18. Moon, H.-K. and S.-P. Hong. 2004. The taxonomic consideration of petal and sepal micromorphology in Lycopus L. (Mentheae-Lamiaceae). Korean Journal of Plant Taxonomy 34: 273-285. https://doi.org/10.11110/kjpt.2004.34.4.273
  19. Ojeda, I., S.-G. Arnoldo, C.-C. Juli, J.-M. Ruth, M. Aguedo and C. B. C. Quentin. 2012. Comparative micromorphology of petals in Macaronesian Lotus (Leguminosae) reveals a loss of papillose conical cells during the evolution of bird pollination. International Journal of Plant Sciences 173: 365-374. https://doi.org/10.1086/664713
  20. Ojeda, I., J. Francisco-Ortega and Q. C. B. Cronk. 2009. Evolution of petal epidermal micromorphology in Leguminosae and its use as a marker of petal identity. Annals of Botany 104: 1099-1110. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcp211
  21. Paton, A. 1992. The adaptive significance of calyx and nutlet morphology in Scutellaria. In Advanced in Labiate Science. Harley, R. M. and T. Reynolds (eds.), Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. Pp. 203-210.
  22. Rohweder, O. 1970. Centrosperrnen-studien 4. Morphologie und Anatomie der Bluten, Fruchte und Samen bei Alsinoideen und Paronychioideens. lat. (Caryophyllaceae). Bot Jahrbucher 90: 201-271.
  23. Ronse Decraene, L.-P. and J. R. Akeroyd. 1988. Generic limits in Polygonum and related genera (Polygonaceae) on the basis of floral characters. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 98: 321-371. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.1988.tb01706.x
  24. Ronse Decraene, L.-P., S.-P. Hong and E. Smets. 2000. Systematic significance of fruit morphology and anatomy in tribes Persicarieae and Polygoneae (Polygonaceae). Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 134: 301-337. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8339.2000.tb02356.x
  25. Ronse Decraene, L.-P. and E. Smets. 1987. The distribution and the systematic relevance of the androecial characters oligomery and polymery in the Magnoliophytina. Nordic Journal of Botany 7: 239-253. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-1051.1987.tb00936.x
  26. Ronse Decraene, L.-P. and E. Smets. 1991. The floral nectaries of Polygonum s.l. and related genera (Persicarieae and Polygoneae): position, morphological nature and semophylesis. Flora 185: 165-185. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0367-2530(17)30468-1
  27. Schuster, T. M., J. L. Reveal, M. J. Bayly and K. A. Kron. 2015. An updated molecular phylogeny of Polygonoideae (Polygonaceae): relationships of Oxygonum, Pteroxygonum, and Rumex, and a new circumscription of Koenigia. Taxon 64: 1188-1208. https://doi.org/10.12705/646.5
  28. Thiers, B. 2018. [continuously updated] Index Herbariorum: A global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. Retrieved Jun. 1, 2018, available from http://sweetgum.nybg.org/science/ih/.
  29. Whitney, H. M., K. M. V. Bennett, M. Dorling, L. Sandbach, D. Prince, L. Chittka and B. J. Glover. 2011. Why do so many petals have conical epidermal cells? Annals of Botany 108: 609-616. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcr065
  30. Zandonella, P. 1977. Apports de l'etude comparee des nectaires floraux a la conception phylogenetique de l'ordre des centrospermales par. Plant Biology 90: 105-125.
  31. Zhao, D.-P., K.-M. Wang and Y.-T. Hou. 2012. Phylogeny of Polygonum sect. Cephalophilon (Polygonaceae) inferred from the chloroplast trnL-F, rbcL and nuclear ribosomal ITS sequences. Bulletin of Botanical Research 32: 77-83.
  32. Zhu, L.-T., F.-J. Lu, Y.-T. Hou and F.-Z. Li. 2007. Micro-morphology of leaf epidermis and its taxonomic significance of Polygonum section Cephalophilon in China. Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research 25: 136-142.