Journal of the Korea Society for Simulation (한국시뮬레이션학회논문지)

The Korea Society for Simulation (한국시뮬레이션학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

Relevance Verification of Staff Organizations using System Dynamics

시스템 다이내믹스 기법을 활용한 참모부 조직편성 적절성 검증

  • Received : 2017.12.29
  • Accepted : 2018.07.09
  • Published : 2018.09.30
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

Since warfare surroundings getting complex and diverse in the future, it is not simple to make appropriate structures and organizations for military groups along the phenomenon. Therefore, this study proposes a methodology of verification for army staff's structure and organization by units in the future using System Dynamics(SD). The procedure of using SD for the verification is a calculation of database(DB), the design of causal loop diagram, and the simulation and analysis. First, DB such as individuals' workload and time is calculated through observation after a real group of staff. Second, the causal loop diagram is considered by a flow of task, and it is modeled. Third, the DB is entered into the model and simulated for analyzing of appropriacy. This study used Powersim program for designing the SD model. One of the weaknesses of the methodology of this study is possibilities of a different result by the DB by observers and perspectives by analysts. As supplementation for the weakness, this study includes research analysis and surveys for the total analysis. The meaning of this study is that it suggests a methodology of warfighting experimentation to analyze structure and organization of military groups with quantifying suitability in the scientific method.

미래 전장 환경이 복잡하고 다양화됨에 따라 조직에 적절한 구조 및 편성을 작성하는 것도 간단하지 않은 일이 되었다. 이에 본 연구에서는 육군의 미래 제대별 참모부 편성을 시스템 다이내믹스를 활용하여 검증하는 방법론을 제시한다. 참모부 구조 및 편성 검증을 위한 SD 활용 절차는 입력 DB값 산출, 인과지도 작성 및 모델 구축, 모의 및 분석 순으로 진행된다. 시스템 다이내믹스를 활용한 모의분석의 취약점은 입력 값에 따라 결과가 달라질 수 있고 모의인원의 관점에 따라 분석이 달라질 수 있다는 것이다. 본 연구에서는 이에 대한 보완책으로 연구 분석, 설문 등을 병행하여 종합분석에 포함하는 방법을 적용하였다. 본 연구의 의의는 군조직의 구조 및 편성을 검증하기 위한 과학적인 방법으로 조직편성의 적절성을 정량화하여 판단할 수 있는 전투실험 방법을 제시함으로써 그 활용 가치가 크다고 판단된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Anthony P Tvaryanas, William T Thomson (2006), Fatigue in military aviation shift workers: survey results for selected occupational groups, Aviation, space, and environment medicine 77 (11), 1166-1170.
  2. Coyle, R.G. (2012), System Dynamics Modeling, Chapman, & Hall.
  3. Curtis L. Newcomb (1993), Principles of Future Army Force Structure Design, U.S. Army War College, Carlistic Barrackes, Pennsylvania 17013, USA.
  4. Henk A Akkermans, Kim E Van Oorschot (2005), Relevance assumed: a case study of balanced scorecard development using system dynamics, Journal of the Operational Research Society 56 (8), 931-941. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601923
  5. Jack Baroudi, Henry C Lucas Jr (1994), The role of information technology in organization design, Journal of Management Information Systems 10 (4) 9-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/07421222.1994.11518018
  6. James M Lyneis, Kenneth G Cooper (2001), Strategic management of complex projects: a case study using system dynamics, System Dynamics Review 17 (3), 237-260. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.213
  7. Jay W. Forrester (1973), Principle of Systems, MIT Press, Cambridge Massachusetts, USA.
  8. Lane, D.D., (2000), "Diagramming Conventions in System Dynamics, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 51(2): pp. 241-245. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600864
  9. Powersim Software, www.stramo.com
  10. Sterman, J.D. (2000), Business Dynamics, Boston, Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
  11. Wang, J. (2004), A Review of Operations Research Applications in Workforce Planning and Potential Modeling of Military Training. DSTO-TR-1688.
  12. 김상욱(2006), 시스템사고의 이해, 삼성경제연구소 복잡계 특강시리즈
  13. 김영표(1992), 다이나모와 시스템 다이내믹스 기법, 국토연구원, 국토논단 10(10), 32-43.
  14. 육군본부(2014), 야전교범 14-0-2 전투피로증 관리
  15. 한국국방연구원(2000), 국방 군수자원 평가체계 개념 연구 (종합 개발 계획서), 39-49.